EEG bispectral index sensor guidance improves accuracy and safety of procedural sedation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
A Oh, N Karim, A Pitt, S Hodgetts, D W Edwards, D Mullan, H-U Laasch
{"title":"EEG bispectral index sensor guidance improves accuracy and safety of procedural sedation.","authors":"A Oh, N Karim, A Pitt, S Hodgetts, D W Edwards, D Mullan, H-U Laasch","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To re-audit compliance with an amended sedation protocol following the latest national guidelines. To confirm the improved safety achieved through EEG guidance for drug administration during procedural sedation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following the revision of the departmental protocol, 14 standards were set. Sedation data and outcomes in 150 consecutive patients undergoing fluoroscopic and combined endoscopic procedures were evaluated against these. Combination sedo-analgesia was titrated by the interventional radiology nurses guided by bispectral index sensor (BIS) measurements to achieve readings between 80 and 85. Doses were stratified by patient age and ASA status. Nasal oxygen was given and standard monitoring including pulse oximetry and capnography were used alongside to assess for complications, notably hypoxaemia of ≤ 94%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85% were non-vascular procedures, the bulk made up of oesophageal stent insertion, gastrostomy, oesophageal dilatation of radiation strictures and biliary procedures. Mean procedure time was 32.9 minutes (10-170). Mean doses of midazolam and fentanyl were 3.99mg (±1.9) and 92.3μg (±35.4), respectively. 84% of patients were classified as having received light or moderate sedation (BIS 70-89). Three standards for patient sedation were missed, but no patient required sedation reversal or airway management, and none developed hypoxaemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BIS guidance of sedation administration allows real-time assessment of the patient's response to sedo-analgesia administered and allows prediction about the safety of further drug administration. It identifies patients waking up, allowing this to be anticipated and reduces interruptions of the procedure. It offers clear clinical advantages to interval assessment of patients' response to clinical stimuli and reduces under-as well as oversedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To re-audit compliance with an amended sedation protocol following the latest national guidelines. To confirm the improved safety achieved through EEG guidance for drug administration during procedural sedation.

Materials and methods: Following the revision of the departmental protocol, 14 standards were set. Sedation data and outcomes in 150 consecutive patients undergoing fluoroscopic and combined endoscopic procedures were evaluated against these. Combination sedo-analgesia was titrated by the interventional radiology nurses guided by bispectral index sensor (BIS) measurements to achieve readings between 80 and 85. Doses were stratified by patient age and ASA status. Nasal oxygen was given and standard monitoring including pulse oximetry and capnography were used alongside to assess for complications, notably hypoxaemia of ≤ 94%.

Results: 85% were non-vascular procedures, the bulk made up of oesophageal stent insertion, gastrostomy, oesophageal dilatation of radiation strictures and biliary procedures. Mean procedure time was 32.9 minutes (10-170). Mean doses of midazolam and fentanyl were 3.99mg (±1.9) and 92.3μg (±35.4), respectively. 84% of patients were classified as having received light or moderate sedation (BIS 70-89). Three standards for patient sedation were missed, but no patient required sedation reversal or airway management, and none developed hypoxaemia.

Conclusions: BIS guidance of sedation administration allows real-time assessment of the patient's response to sedo-analgesia administered and allows prediction about the safety of further drug administration. It identifies patients waking up, allowing this to be anticipated and reduces interruptions of the procedure. It offers clear clinical advantages to interval assessment of patients' response to clinical stimuli and reduces under-as well as oversedation.

脑电图双谱指数传感器引导提高了手术镇静的准确性和安全性。
目的:根据最新的国家指导方针,重新审核修订后的镇静方案的合规性。确认在手术镇静过程中通过脑电图指导用药提高了安全性:在修订了科室方案后,制定了 14 项标准。根据这些标准对接受透视手术和内窥镜联合手术的 150 名连续患者的镇静数据和结果进行了评估。介入放射科护士在双谱指数传感器(BIS)测量值的指导下对复合镇静镇痛剂进行滴定,使读数达到 80 至 85 之间。剂量根据患者年龄和 ASA 状态进行分层。鼻腔供氧和标准监测包括脉搏血氧饱和度和二氧化碳呼气监测,同时用于评估并发症,特别是低氧血症≤94%:85%的手术为非血管手术,主要包括食道支架植入、胃造口术、放射性狭窄食道扩张术和胆道手术。平均手术时间为 32.9 分钟(10-170 分钟)。咪达唑仑和芬太尼的平均剂量分别为 3.99 毫克(±1.9)和 92.3 微克(±35.4)。84%的患者被归类为接受了轻度或中度镇静(BIS 70-89)。有三例患者镇静标准失误,但没有患者需要镇静逆转或气道管理,也没有患者出现低氧血症:结论:镇静用药的 BIS 指导可实时评估患者对镇静镇痛药的反应,并预测进一步用药的安全性。它还能识别苏醒的患者,从而对其进行预测并减少手术中断。它为间隔评估病人对临床刺激的反应提供了明显的临床优势,减少了镇静不足和镇静过度的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信