Use of continuous positive airway pressure in drainage of pleural effusion: Educational intervention for evidence-based practice.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clinics Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100499
Elinaldo da Conceição Dos Santos, Adilson Mendes, Daniela Gonçalves Ohara, Hiago Vinicius Costa Silva, Jhéssica Crhistina Veiga Nascimento, João Paulo Rodrigues Pacheco, William Poncin, Gregory Reychler, Juliana Ribeiro Fonseca Franco de Macedo, Adriana Claudia Lunardi
{"title":"Use of continuous positive airway pressure in drainage of pleural effusion: Educational intervention for evidence-based practice.","authors":"Elinaldo da Conceição Dos Santos, Adilson Mendes, Daniela Gonçalves Ohara, Hiago Vinicius Costa Silva, Jhéssica Crhistina Veiga Nascimento, João Paulo Rodrigues Pacheco, William Poncin, Gregory Reychler, Juliana Ribeiro Fonseca Franco de Macedo, Adriana Claudia Lunardi","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create an educational intervention for health professionals and test its effectiveness in implementing the use of CPAP in hospitalized patients with pleural effusion undergoing thoracic drainage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This implementation study was developed in 5 hospitals in Brazil and one in Belgium within four phases: (I) Situational diagnosis (professionals and patients' knowledge about CPAP usage for drained pleural effusion and checking medical records for the last 6 months); (II) Education and training of professionals; (III) New situational diagnosis (equal to phase I); (IV) Follow-up for two years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>65 professionals, 117 patients' medical records, and 64 patients were enrolled in this study. Initially, only 72% of medical records presented a description of interventions. CPAP usage was mentioned in only one patient with a chest tube. After phase III, the number of professionals who used CPAP for their patients with drained pleural effusion increased from 28.8% to 66.7%, p < 0.001. Similarly, the acceptability of this therapy for this clinical situation also increased among professionals from 6.4 ± 1.3 to 7.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.001. However, before the implementation, only one medical record described the use of CPAP in one patient with drained pleural effusion. After two years, the use of CPAP therapy by healthcare professionals for patients with drained thoracic drainage was sustained in 3 hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The educational intervention for the use of CPAP in patients with drained pleural effusion was effective for health professionals. Results were sustained after two years in three of the six hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To create an educational intervention for health professionals and test its effectiveness in implementing the use of CPAP in hospitalized patients with pleural effusion undergoing thoracic drainage.

Methods: This implementation study was developed in 5 hospitals in Brazil and one in Belgium within four phases: (I) Situational diagnosis (professionals and patients' knowledge about CPAP usage for drained pleural effusion and checking medical records for the last 6 months); (II) Education and training of professionals; (III) New situational diagnosis (equal to phase I); (IV) Follow-up for two years.

Results: 65 professionals, 117 patients' medical records, and 64 patients were enrolled in this study. Initially, only 72% of medical records presented a description of interventions. CPAP usage was mentioned in only one patient with a chest tube. After phase III, the number of professionals who used CPAP for their patients with drained pleural effusion increased from 28.8% to 66.7%, p < 0.001. Similarly, the acceptability of this therapy for this clinical situation also increased among professionals from 6.4 ± 1.3 to 7.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.001. However, before the implementation, only one medical record described the use of CPAP in one patient with drained pleural effusion. After two years, the use of CPAP therapy by healthcare professionals for patients with drained thoracic drainage was sustained in 3 hospitals.

Conclusions: The educational intervention for the use of CPAP in patients with drained pleural effusion was effective for health professionals. Results were sustained after two years in three of the six hospitals.

使用持续气道正压引流胸腔积液:循证实践的教育干预。
目的为医疗专业人员制定一项教育干预措施,并测试其在住院胸腔引流术胸腔积液患者中使用 CPAP 的有效性:这项实施研究在巴西的 5 家医院和比利时的 1 家医院开展,分为四个阶段:(I) 情境诊断(专业人员和患者对胸腔积液引流使用 CPAP 的了解,并检查过去 6 个月的医疗记录);(II) 对专业人员进行教育和培训;(III) 新的情境诊断(与第一阶段相同);(IV) 随访两年:65 名专业人员、117 份患者病历和 64 名患者参与了此次研究。最初,只有 72% 的病历对干预措施进行了描述。只有一名胸腔插管患者提及使用 CPAP。第三阶段结束后,为胸腔积液引流患者使用 CPAP 的专业人员从 28.8% 增加到 66.7%,P < 0.001。同样,专业人员对这种临床治疗方法的接受度也从 6.4 ± 1.3 提高到 7.8 ± 1.4,p < 0.001。然而,在实施前,只有一份病历描述了一名胸腔积液引流患者使用过 CPAP。两年后,3 家医院的医护人员持续为胸腔引流液引流患者使用 CPAP 治疗:结论:针对胸腔积液引流患者使用 CPAP 的教育干预对医护人员很有效。结论:对胸腔积液引流患者使用 CPAP 的教育干预对医护人员很有效,6 家医院中有 3 家在两年后保持了效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信