Prosthesis choice in the adult USA population with partial edentulism.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jiale Li, Zhaohua Ji, Zhe Zhao, Fu Wang, Min Tian
{"title":"Prosthesis choice in the adult USA population with partial edentulism.","authors":"Jiale Li, Zhaohua Ji, Zhe Zhao, Fu Wang, Min Tian","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05934-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of prostheses and investigate how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence choices of restoration types in the adult population of the United States over 20 years of age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) conducted from 2017 to March 2020 Pre-Pandemic Data. We examined demographic and socioeconomic variables, dentition status, and restoration types among participants with partial edentulism. The percentage of categorical variables between restoration types was compared using chi-square tests. Multinomial logistic regression models were employed to explore the relationship between prosthetic choices and demographic and socioeconomic factors, both unadjusted and adjusted for all characteristics, including the number of missing teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15,560 participants, 7,805 eligible individuals with a mean age of 47.8 and a male percentage of 48.4% were included in the analysis. The results indicated that individuals who were younger, male, of Mexican American or non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, possessed lower educational attainment, were never married, had a low income-to-poverty ratio, held private insurance, or were unemployed were more inclined to choose no restoration. Further, males, non-Hispanic Black individuals, those with lower educational attainment, lower income-to-poverty ratios, and those who were unemployed or retired were more likely to choose RPDs over FPDs. Furthermore, never-married individuals and those with private insurance were likelier to choose FPDs in the maxilla (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant differences were observed among restoration types, demographic and socioeconomic variables, and dentition status in both the upper and lower jaws.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study underscores the significance of socioeconomic variables in the restoration of partial edentulism.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 10","pages":"554"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05934-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of prostheses and investigate how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence choices of restoration types in the adult population of the United States over 20 years of age.

Materials and methods: The study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) conducted from 2017 to March 2020 Pre-Pandemic Data. We examined demographic and socioeconomic variables, dentition status, and restoration types among participants with partial edentulism. The percentage of categorical variables between restoration types was compared using chi-square tests. Multinomial logistic regression models were employed to explore the relationship between prosthetic choices and demographic and socioeconomic factors, both unadjusted and adjusted for all characteristics, including the number of missing teeth.

Results: Out of 15,560 participants, 7,805 eligible individuals with a mean age of 47.8 and a male percentage of 48.4% were included in the analysis. The results indicated that individuals who were younger, male, of Mexican American or non-Hispanic Black ethnicity, possessed lower educational attainment, were never married, had a low income-to-poverty ratio, held private insurance, or were unemployed were more inclined to choose no restoration. Further, males, non-Hispanic Black individuals, those with lower educational attainment, lower income-to-poverty ratios, and those who were unemployed or retired were more likely to choose RPDs over FPDs. Furthermore, never-married individuals and those with private insurance were likelier to choose FPDs in the maxilla (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Significant differences were observed among restoration types, demographic and socioeconomic variables, and dentition status in both the upper and lower jaws.

Clinical relevance: This study underscores the significance of socioeconomic variables in the restoration of partial edentulism.

美国成人部分缺牙症患者的假牙选择。
目的:本研究旨在估算美国 20 岁以上成年人的修复率,并调查人口和社会经济特征如何影响修复类型的选择:本研究旨在估算美国 20 岁以上成年人的假肢使用率,并调查人口和社会经济特征如何影响修复类型的选择:该研究利用了 2017 年至 2020 年 3 月进行的美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的大流行前数据。我们研究了部分缺牙症参与者的人口统计学和社会经济变量、牙齿状况和修复类型。修复类型之间的分类变量百分比采用卡方检验进行比较。采用多项式逻辑回归模型来探讨修复体选择与人口和社会经济因素之间的关系,既包括未调整的因素,也包括对所有特征(包括缺失牙齿数量)进行调整的因素:在 15,560 名参与者中,7,805 名符合条件的人被纳入分析,他们的平均年龄为 47.8 岁,男性比例为 48.4%。结果显示,年龄较小、男性、墨西哥裔美国人或非西班牙裔黑人、教育程度较低、从未结过婚、收入与贫困比例较低、持有私人保险或失业的人更倾向于选择不修复。此外,男性、非西班牙裔黑人、教育程度较低、收入与贫困比率较低、失业或退休人员更倾向于选择 RPD 而不是 FPD。此外,未婚者和有私人保险的人更倾向于选择上颌的FPD(p 结论):在上颌和下颌的修复类型、人口统计学和社会经济变量以及牙齿状况之间观察到了显著差异:本研究强调了社会经济变量在部分缺牙修复中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信