Cut-off point development for the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised in perimenopausal women.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Chen Zhu, Elizabeth H X Thomas, Qi Li, Shalini Arunogiri, Caroline Gurvich
{"title":"Cut-off point development for the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised in perimenopausal women.","authors":"Chen Zhu, Elizabeth H X Thomas, Qi Li, Shalini Arunogiri, Caroline Gurvich","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2024.2401369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective cognitive complaints have been reported in women during perimenopause and the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised (EMQ-R) has been recently evaluated as a standardized instrument to measure subjective cognitive changes. The purpose of this study was to identify potential cut-off points for the EMQ-R retrieval subscale and attentional subscale, and to assess the validity of these cut-off points in detecting objective cognitive changes associated with reported subjective cognitive complaints.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>After screening, 232 perimenopausal women were included in the analyses. The supervised classification and regression tree was applied to identify optimal cut-off points. Its performance was evaluated by the value of the receiver operating characteristics curve, sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed that the optimal cut-off point for the attentional subscale was 7, and for the retrieval subscale was 13. Both cut-off points presented acceptable discrimination performance. An independent <i>t</i>-test indicated that both cut-off points were associated with significant differences in scores on neuropsychological measures of retrieval (episodic memory and verbal fluency) as well as neuropsychological measures of higher-level attention (working memory).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identified cut-off points may be helpful for women to track or quantify their subjective experiences of brain fog or cognitive symptoms during the menopause transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2401369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Subjective cognitive complaints have been reported in women during perimenopause and the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised (EMQ-R) has been recently evaluated as a standardized instrument to measure subjective cognitive changes. The purpose of this study was to identify potential cut-off points for the EMQ-R retrieval subscale and attentional subscale, and to assess the validity of these cut-off points in detecting objective cognitive changes associated with reported subjective cognitive complaints.

Method: After screening, 232 perimenopausal women were included in the analyses. The supervised classification and regression tree was applied to identify optimal cut-off points. Its performance was evaluated by the value of the receiver operating characteristics curve, sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Findings revealed that the optimal cut-off point for the attentional subscale was 7, and for the retrieval subscale was 13. Both cut-off points presented acceptable discrimination performance. An independent t-test indicated that both cut-off points were associated with significant differences in scores on neuropsychological measures of retrieval (episodic memory and verbal fluency) as well as neuropsychological measures of higher-level attention (working memory).

Conclusion: The identified cut-off points may be helpful for women to track or quantify their subjective experiences of brain fog or cognitive symptoms during the menopause transition.

围绝经期妇女日常记忆力问卷--修订版的临界点开发。
目的:有报告称,围绝经期妇女会出现主观认知方面的不适,而 "日常记忆问卷-修订版"(EMQ-R)最近被评估为测量主观认知变化的标准化工具。本研究的目的是确定 EMQ-R 检索分量表和注意分量表的潜在临界点,并评估这些临界点在检测与所报告的主观认知抱怨相关的客观认知变化方面的有效性:经过筛选,232 名围绝经期妇女被纳入分析。应用监督分类和回归树来确定最佳临界点。结果:研究结果表明,最佳临界点的设定值为 0.001,而最佳临界点的设定值为 0.002:结果表明,注意力分量表的最佳截断点为 7,检索分量表的最佳截断点为 13。这两个分界点都具有可接受的辨别性能。独立 t 检验表明,这两个临界点与检索神经心理学测量(外显记忆和言语流畅性)以及高级注意力神经心理学测量(工作记忆)的得分存在显著差异:结论:所确定的临界点可能有助于妇女跟踪或量化她们在更年期过渡期的脑雾或认知症状的主观体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climacteric
Climacteric 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信