Acquisition and Handling of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Samples: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.056
Christopher R Gilbert, Claire Dust, A Christine Argento, David Feller-Kopman, Anne V Gonzalez, Felix Herth, Jonathan M Iaccarino, Peter Illei, Kevin O'Neil, Nicholas Pastis, M Patricia Rivera, Lynette Sholl, Gerard A Silvestri, Jeffrey Thiboutot, Momen M Wahidi, Kazuhiro Yasafuku, Lonny B Yarmus
{"title":"Acquisition and Handling of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Samples: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.","authors":"Christopher R Gilbert, Claire Dust, A Christine Argento, David Feller-Kopman, Anne V Gonzalez, Felix Herth, Jonathan M Iaccarino, Peter Illei, Kevin O'Neil, Nicholas Pastis, M Patricia Rivera, Lynette Sholl, Gerard A Silvestri, Jeffrey Thiboutot, Momen M Wahidi, Kazuhiro Yasafuku, Lonny B Yarmus","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become the standard for initial lung cancer diagnosis and staging. Previous guidelines have generally focused on the \"when\" and \"how\" of EBUS-TBNA; however, little guidance is available on handling and processing specimens during and after acquisition to help optimize both diagnostic yield and tissue integrity for ancillary studies. This document examines the available literature on EBUS-TBNA specimen processing and handling.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Rigorous methodology was applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. Panelists developed key clinical questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome format, addressing specific topics in EBUS-TBNA specimen processing. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant literature, supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion with document evaluation tools to assess the quality of included studies, extract meaningful data, and grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature of the nine Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome questions related to handling and processing EBUS-TBNA specimens resulted in nine evidence-based statements.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Evidence of the handling and processing of EBUS-TBNA specimens varies in strength but is satisfactory in some areas to guide clinicians in certain aspects of specimen handling. Additional research in many aspects of specimen handling and processing is needed to help improve our knowledge base.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"899-909"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become the standard for initial lung cancer diagnosis and staging. Previous guidelines have generally focused on the "when" and "how" of EBUS-TBNA; however, little guidance is available on handling and processing specimens during and after acquisition to help optimize both diagnostic yield and tissue integrity for ancillary studies. This document examines the available literature on EBUS-TBNA specimen processing and handling.

Study design and methods: Rigorous methodology was applied to provide a trustworthy evidence-based guideline and expert panel report. Panelists developed key clinical questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome format, addressing specific topics in EBUS-TBNA specimen processing. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant literature, supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion with document evaluation tools to assess the quality of included studies, extract meaningful data, and grade the level of evidence to support each recommendation or suggestion.

Results: Our systematic review and critical analysis of the literature of the nine Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome questions related to handling and processing EBUS-TBNA specimens resulted in nine evidence-based statements.

Interpretation: Evidence of the handling and processing of EBUS-TBNA specimens varies in strength but is satisfactory in some areas to guide clinicians in certain aspects of specimen handling. Additional research in many aspects of specimen handling and processing is needed to help improve our knowledge base.

支气管内超声经支气管针样本的采集和处理--美国胸科医师学会临床实践指南。
背景:支气管内超声引导下经支气管抽吸术(EBUS-TBNA)已成为肺癌初步诊断和分期的标准。以往的指南通常侧重于 EBUS-TBNA 的 "何时 "和 "如何";然而,在采集过程中和采集后如何处理和加工标本,以帮助优化诊断结果和辅助研究的组织完整性方面,却鲜有指导。本文研究了有关 EBUS-TBNA 标本处理的现有文献:方法:采用严格的方法来提供可信的循证指南和专家小组报告。专家小组成员利用 PICO(人群、干预、比较者和结果)格式提出关键临床问题,解决 EBUS-TBNA 标本处理中的具体问题。系统检索了 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)和 Cochrane 图书馆,以确定相关文献,并辅以人工检索。使用文献评估工具对纳入的参考文献进行筛选,以评估纳入研究的质量、提取有意义的数据,并对支持每项建议或意见的证据水平进行分级:我们对与处理和处理 EBUS-TBNA 标本相关的 9 个 PICO 问题进行了系统回顾和文献批判性分析,得出了 9 项循证声明:有关处理和加工 EBUS-TBNA 标本的证据在强度上存在差异,但在某些方面还是令人满意的,可以在标本处理的某些方面为临床医生提供指导。还需要对标本处理和加工的许多方面进行更多研究,以帮助完善我们的知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信