Suture Tying Force for Cut-Out during Radial Meniscus Tear Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Failure Loads during the Knot-Tying Process.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Patrick A Massey, Edwin Dudoussat, Carver Montgomery, Wayne Scalisi, Hayden McBride, Robert Rutz, Giovanni F Solitro
{"title":"Suture Tying Force for Cut-Out during Radial Meniscus Tear Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Failure Loads during the Knot-Tying Process.","authors":"Patrick A Massey, Edwin Dudoussat, Carver Montgomery, Wayne Scalisi, Hayden McBride, Robert Rutz, Giovanni F Solitro","doi":"10.1177/19476035241284827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the study was to determine average tensile forces resulting in suture failure while tying a knot during repair of complete radial meniscus tears and to compare the failure tensile force based on meniscus tissue location: the peripheral (red-red) versus inner (white-white).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was designed as a cadaveric biomechanical study using 24 menisci harvested from fresh frozen cadaveric knees with midbody radial tears. Tears were repaired using 2-0 nonabsorbable suture in both the inner meniscus and the peripheral meniscus. A force gauge was used to measure the tension of a surgeon's knot until failure of either the suture or the meniscus tissue. Statistical analysis was performed comparing suture failure tensile forces between inner and peripheral sutures using 2-sample <i>t</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suture repairs primarily failed due to meniscal tissue cut-out after suture tensioning (96%). There was no statistical difference in failure mode between medial and lateral meniscus for both the inner (100% cut-out) and the peripheral (92% cut-out; <i>P</i> = 0.703) sutures. The peripheral sutures failed as significantly higher loads (54 ± 26 N) than the inner sutures (36 ± 11 N, <i>P</i> = 0.006). The peripheral meniscus tissue tolerated significantly higher tension at failure (36 ± 7 N) than the inner meniscus (26 ± 7 N, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When tying parallel sutures to repair a radial meniscus tear, suture tensile forces above 30 N may tear through meniscus tissue. Surgeons should not use suture tying forces above 30 N when repairing radial meniscus tears with parallel sutures. The peripheral meniscus can withstand higher knot-tying forces than the inner meniscus, so surgeons should consider tying the peripheral suture before the inner suture.</p>","PeriodicalId":9626,"journal":{"name":"CARTILAGE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CARTILAGE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035241284827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine average tensile forces resulting in suture failure while tying a knot during repair of complete radial meniscus tears and to compare the failure tensile force based on meniscus tissue location: the peripheral (red-red) versus inner (white-white).

Design: This study was designed as a cadaveric biomechanical study using 24 menisci harvested from fresh frozen cadaveric knees with midbody radial tears. Tears were repaired using 2-0 nonabsorbable suture in both the inner meniscus and the peripheral meniscus. A force gauge was used to measure the tension of a surgeon's knot until failure of either the suture or the meniscus tissue. Statistical analysis was performed comparing suture failure tensile forces between inner and peripheral sutures using 2-sample t test.

Results: Suture repairs primarily failed due to meniscal tissue cut-out after suture tensioning (96%). There was no statistical difference in failure mode between medial and lateral meniscus for both the inner (100% cut-out) and the peripheral (92% cut-out; P = 0.703) sutures. The peripheral sutures failed as significantly higher loads (54 ± 26 N) than the inner sutures (36 ± 11 N, P = 0.006). The peripheral meniscus tissue tolerated significantly higher tension at failure (36 ± 7 N) than the inner meniscus (26 ± 7 N, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: When tying parallel sutures to repair a radial meniscus tear, suture tensile forces above 30 N may tear through meniscus tissue. Surgeons should not use suture tying forces above 30 N when repairing radial meniscus tears with parallel sutures. The peripheral meniscus can withstand higher knot-tying forces than the inner meniscus, so surgeons should consider tying the peripheral suture before the inner suture.

桡侧半月板撕裂修复术中切口的缝合线打结力:对打结过程中破坏载荷的生物力学评估
研究目的该研究的目的是确定在修复完全性桡侧半月板撕裂时打结时导致缝合失败的平均拉力,并根据半月板组织位置:外周(红-红)与内侧(白-白)比较失败拉力:本研究设计为一项尸体生物力学研究,使用了从新鲜冷冻尸体膝关节上采集的 24 个半月板,这些半月板都有中体径向撕裂。在半月板内侧和外周使用 2-0 非吸收缝线修复撕裂。使用测力计测量外科医生绳结的张力,直至缝合线或半月板组织失效。使用双样本 t 检验对内部缝合和外围缝合的缝合失败拉力进行了统计分析:结果:缝合修复失败的主要原因是缝合张力后半月板组织被切断(96%)。内侧缝合线(100% 切断)和外周缝合线(92% 切断;P = 0.703)在半月板内侧和外侧的失败模式上没有统计学差异。外周缝合的失效载荷(54 ± 26 N)明显高于内侧缝合(36 ± 11 N,P = 0.006)。外周半月板组织承受的破坏张力(36 ± 7 N)明显高于内侧半月板(26 ± 7 N,P < 0.001):结论:在进行平行缝合以修复径向半月板撕裂时,超过 30 N 的缝合拉力可能会撕裂半月板组织。外科医生在使用平行缝合线修复桡侧半月板撕裂时,缝合拉力不应超过 30 N。外周半月板可承受比内侧半月板更高的打结力,因此外科医生应考虑在内侧缝合前打结外周缝合线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CARTILAGE
CARTILAGE ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: CARTILAGE publishes articles related to the musculoskeletal system with particular attention to cartilage repair, development, function, degeneration, transplantation, and rehabilitation. The journal is a forum for the exchange of ideas for the many types of researchers and clinicians involved in cartilage biology and repair. A primary objective of CARTILAGE is to foster the cross-fertilization of the findings between clinical and basic sciences throughout the various disciplines involved in cartilage repair. The journal publishes full length original manuscripts on all types of cartilage including articular, nasal, auricular, tracheal/bronchial, and intervertebral disc fibrocartilage. Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research are welcome. Review articles, editorials, and letters are also encouraged. The ICRS envisages CARTILAGE as a forum for the exchange of knowledge among clinicians, scientists, patients, and researchers. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) is dedicated to promotion, encouragement, and distribution of fundamental and applied research of cartilage in order to permit a better knowledge of function and dysfunction of articular cartilage and its repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信