Optimisation of cryopreservation conditions, including storage duration and revival methods, for the viability of human primary cells.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Hafiz Muhaymin Mohamed, Piraveenraj Sundar, Nur Aisyah Ahmad Ridwan, Ai Jia Cheong, Nur Atiqah Mohamad Salleh, Nadiah Sulaiman, Fauzi Mh Busra, Manira Maarof
{"title":"Optimisation of cryopreservation conditions, including storage duration and revival methods, for the viability of human primary cells.","authors":"Hafiz Muhaymin Mohamed, Piraveenraj Sundar, Nur Aisyah Ahmad Ridwan, Ai Jia Cheong, Nur Atiqah Mohamad Salleh, Nadiah Sulaiman, Fauzi Mh Busra, Manira Maarof","doi":"10.1186/s12860-024-00516-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryopreservation is a crucial procedure for safeguarding cells or other biological constructs, showcasing considerable potential for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different cryopreservation conditions on human cells viability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A set of cryopreserved data from Department of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (DTERM) cell bank were analyse for cells attachment after 24 h being revived. The revived cells were analysed based on different cryopreservation conditions which includes cell types (skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts, respiratory epithelial, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (MSC); cryo mediums (FBS + 10% DMSO; commercial medium); storage durations (0 to > 24 months) and locations (tank 1-2; box 1-5), and revival methods (direct; indirect methods). Human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) were then cultured, cryopreserved in different cryo mediums (HPL + 10% DMSO; FBS + 10% DMSO; Cryostor) and stored for 1 and 3 months. The HDFs were revived using either direct or indirect method and cell number, viability and protein expression analysis were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analysis cell cryopreserved data; fibroblast cells; FBS + 10% DMSO cryo medium; storage duration of 0-6 months; direct cell revival; storage in vapor phase of cryo tank; had the highest number of vials with optimal cell attachment after 24 h revived. HDFs cryopreserved in FBS + 10% DMSO for 1 and 3 months with both revival methods, showed optimal live cell numbers and viability above 80%, higher than other cryo medium groups. Morphologically, the fibroblasts were able to retain their phenotype with positive expression of Ki67 and Col-1. HDFs cryopreserved in FBS + 10% DMSO at 3 months showed significantly higher expression of Ki67 (97.3% ± 4.62) with the indirect revival method, while Col-1 expression (100%) was significantly higher at both 1 and 3 months compared to other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, fibroblasts were able to retain their characteristics after various cryopreservation conditions with a slight decrease in viability that may be due to the thermal-cycling effect. However, further investigation on the longer cryopreservation periods should be conducted for other types of cells and cryo mediums to achieve optimal cryopreservation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-024-00516-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cryopreservation is a crucial procedure for safeguarding cells or other biological constructs, showcasing considerable potential for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different cryopreservation conditions on human cells viability.

Methods: A set of cryopreserved data from Department of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (DTERM) cell bank were analyse for cells attachment after 24 h being revived. The revived cells were analysed based on different cryopreservation conditions which includes cell types (skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts, respiratory epithelial, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (MSC); cryo mediums (FBS + 10% DMSO; commercial medium); storage durations (0 to > 24 months) and locations (tank 1-2; box 1-5), and revival methods (direct; indirect methods). Human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) were then cultured, cryopreserved in different cryo mediums (HPL + 10% DMSO; FBS + 10% DMSO; Cryostor) and stored for 1 and 3 months. The HDFs were revived using either direct or indirect method and cell number, viability and protein expression analysis were compared.

Results: In the analysis cell cryopreserved data; fibroblast cells; FBS + 10% DMSO cryo medium; storage duration of 0-6 months; direct cell revival; storage in vapor phase of cryo tank; had the highest number of vials with optimal cell attachment after 24 h revived. HDFs cryopreserved in FBS + 10% DMSO for 1 and 3 months with both revival methods, showed optimal live cell numbers and viability above 80%, higher than other cryo medium groups. Morphologically, the fibroblasts were able to retain their phenotype with positive expression of Ki67 and Col-1. HDFs cryopreserved in FBS + 10% DMSO at 3 months showed significantly higher expression of Ki67 (97.3% ± 4.62) with the indirect revival method, while Col-1 expression (100%) was significantly higher at both 1 and 3 months compared to other groups.

Conclusion: In conclusion, fibroblasts were able to retain their characteristics after various cryopreservation conditions with a slight decrease in viability that may be due to the thermal-cycling effect. However, further investigation on the longer cryopreservation periods should be conducted for other types of cells and cryo mediums to achieve optimal cryopreservation outcomes.

优化冷冻保存条件,包括保存时间和复苏方法,以提高人类原代细胞的活力。
背景:目的:本研究旨在评估不同低温保存条件对人体细胞活力的影响:方法:对组织工程与再生医学系(DTERM)细胞库中的一组低温保存数据进行分析,以确定细胞复苏 24 小时后的附着情况。根据不同的冷冻保存条件对复苏细胞进行了分析,包括细胞类型(皮肤角质细胞和成纤维细胞、呼吸道上皮细胞、骨髓间充质干细胞(MSC));冷冻培养基(FBS + 10% DMSO;商业培养基);保存时间(0 至 24 个月)和位置(1-2 号罐;1-5 号箱);以及复苏方法(直接法;间接法)。然后培养人真皮成纤维细胞(HDF),在不同的低温培养基(HPL + 10% DMSO;FBS + 10% DMSO;Cryostor)中低温保存,并分别保存 1 个月和 3 个月。采用直接或间接方法复苏 HDFs,比较细胞数量、活力和蛋白质表达分析:结果:在细胞冷冻保存数据分析中,成纤维细胞、FBS + 10% DMSO 冷冻培养基、保存时间为 0-6 个月、直接细胞复苏、在冷冻罐气相中保存、24 小时后复苏的细胞附着最佳的小瓶数量最多。在 FBS + 10% DMSO 中冷冻保存 1 个月和 3 个月的 HDF,在这两种复苏方法下均显示出最佳的活细胞数量和 80% 以上的存活率,高于其他冷冻培养基组。从形态上看,成纤维细胞能够保留其表型,Ki67和Col-1呈阳性表达。间接复苏法显示,在 FBS + 10% DMSO 中冷冻保存 3 个月的 HDF 的 Ki67 表达明显更高(97.3% ± 4.62),而 Col-1 的表达(100%)在 1 个月和 3 个月都明显高于其他组别:总之,成纤维细胞在各种冷冻保存条件下都能保持其特性,但活力略有下降,这可能是热循环效应所致。不过,为了达到最佳的冷冻保存效果,应针对其他类型的细胞和冷冻培养基进行更长冷冻保存期的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信