Assessment and Evaluation of Contemporary Approaches for Astrocyte Differentiation from hiPSCs: A Modeling Paradigm for Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Veronika Juráková, Balázs Széky, Martina Zapletalová, Anita Fehér, Melinda Zana, Shashank Pandey, Radek Kučera, Omar Šerý, Jiří Hudeček, András Dinnyés, Jan Lochman
{"title":"Assessment and Evaluation of Contemporary Approaches for Astrocyte Differentiation from hiPSCs: A Modeling Paradigm for Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Veronika Juráková, Balázs Széky, Martina Zapletalová, Anita Fehér, Melinda Zana, Shashank Pandey, Radek Kučera, Omar Šerý, Jiří Hudeček, András Dinnyés, Jan Lochman","doi":"10.1186/s12575-024-00257-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Astrocytes have recently gained attention as key players in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. Numerous differentiation protocols have been developed to study human astrocytes in vitro. However, the properties of the resulting glia are inconsistent, making it difficult to select an appropriate method for a given research question. Therefore, we compared three approaches for the generation of iPSC-derived astrocytes. We performed a detailed analysis using a widely used long serum-free (LSFP) and short serum-free (SSFP) protocol, as well as a TUSP protocol using serum for a limited time of differentiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used RNA sequencing and immunochemistry to characterize the cultures. Astrocytes generated by the LSFP and SSFP methods differed significantly in their characteristics from those generated by the TUSP method using serum. The TUSP astrocytes had a less neuronal pattern, showed a higher degree of extracellular matrix formation, and were more mature. The short-term presence of FBS in the medium facilitated the induction of astroglia characteristics but did not result in reactive astrocytes. Data from cell-type deconvolution analysis applied to bulk transcriptomes from the cultures assessed their similarity to primary and fetal human astrocytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our analyses highlight the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of a given differentiation protocol for solving specific research tasks or drug discovery studies with iPSC-derived astrocytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-024-00257-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Astrocytes have recently gained attention as key players in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. Numerous differentiation protocols have been developed to study human astrocytes in vitro. However, the properties of the resulting glia are inconsistent, making it difficult to select an appropriate method for a given research question. Therefore, we compared three approaches for the generation of iPSC-derived astrocytes. We performed a detailed analysis using a widely used long serum-free (LSFP) and short serum-free (SSFP) protocol, as well as a TUSP protocol using serum for a limited time of differentiation.

Results: We used RNA sequencing and immunochemistry to characterize the cultures. Astrocytes generated by the LSFP and SSFP methods differed significantly in their characteristics from those generated by the TUSP method using serum. The TUSP astrocytes had a less neuronal pattern, showed a higher degree of extracellular matrix formation, and were more mature. The short-term presence of FBS in the medium facilitated the induction of astroglia characteristics but did not result in reactive astrocytes. Data from cell-type deconvolution analysis applied to bulk transcriptomes from the cultures assessed their similarity to primary and fetal human astrocytes.

Conclusions: Overall, our analyses highlight the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of a given differentiation protocol for solving specific research tasks or drug discovery studies with iPSC-derived astrocytes.

评估和评价从 hiPSCs 分化星形胶质细胞的当代方法:阿尔茨海默病建模范例。
背景:最近,星形胶质细胞作为神经退行性疾病(包括阿尔茨海默病)发病机制中的关键角色备受关注。目前已开发出许多分化方案,用于体外研究人类星形胶质细胞。然而,分化出的胶质细胞的特性并不一致,因此很难为特定的研究问题选择合适的方法。因此,我们比较了三种生成 iPSC 衍生星形胶质细胞的方法。我们使用广泛使用的长无血清(LSFP)和短无血清(SSFP)方案,以及在有限的分化时间内使用血清的 TUSP 方案进行了详细分析:我们使用 RNA 测序和免疫化学方法分析了培养物的特征。通过 LSFP 和 SSFP 方法生成的星形胶质细胞与通过使用血清的 TUSP 方法生成的星形胶质细胞在特征上有显著差异。TUSP 星形胶质细胞的神经元形态较少,细胞外基质形成程度较高,而且更加成熟。培养基中短期添加 FBS 有利于诱导星形胶质细胞的特征,但不会产生反应性星形胶质细胞。对培养物的大量转录组进行的细胞类型解卷积分析数据评估了它们与原代和胎儿人类星形胶质细胞的相似性:总之,我们的分析强调,在利用 iPSC 衍生星形胶质细胞完成特定研究任务或药物发现研究时,需要考虑特定分化方案的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信