Validation of the Reactive Attachment Disorder and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder Assessment (RADA): A DSM-5 Semistructured Interview.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Maude Archambault, Chantal Cyr, Helen Minnis, Stine Lehmann, Sebastien Monette
{"title":"Validation of the Reactive Attachment Disorder and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder Assessment (RADA): A <i>DSM</i>-5 Semistructured Interview.","authors":"Maude Archambault, Chantal Cyr, Helen Minnis, Stine Lehmann, Sebastien Monette","doi":"10.1177/10731911241276625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Very few empirically validated tools exist for assessing reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED). The RAD and DSED assessment interview (RADA), a semistructured diagnostic interview, was updated in 2018 from the CAPA-RAD interview to reflect the diagnostic criteria changes in the <i>Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders</i> (5th ed.; <i>DSM-5</i>). The aim of this study was to validate the RADA on school-age children in Canada. Caregivers of 5 to 12-year-old children from the community (<i>n</i> = 98), in foster care (<i>n</i> = 147), and in residential care (<i>n</i> = 123) completed the RADA interview and a series of questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the RADA interview supported a four-factor structure similar to the <i>DSM-5</i> symptom clusters. A short \"strictly <i>DSM-5</i>\" version of the RADA showed a two-factor structure-RAD and DSED-and an excellent fit to the data. Scales of both structures showed good-to-excellent internal consistency, interrater reliability, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Classifying the children yielded RAD and DSED rates of <1% and 18%, respectively, for children in foster care and 7% and 10%, respectively, for children in residential care. This study supports the validity of the RADA interview for school-age children and is the first to provide RAD and DSED rates for children in residential care.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241276625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Very few empirically validated tools exist for assessing reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED). The RAD and DSED assessment interview (RADA), a semistructured diagnostic interview, was updated in 2018 from the CAPA-RAD interview to reflect the diagnostic criteria changes in the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5). The aim of this study was to validate the RADA on school-age children in Canada. Caregivers of 5 to 12-year-old children from the community (n = 98), in foster care (n = 147), and in residential care (n = 123) completed the RADA interview and a series of questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the RADA interview supported a four-factor structure similar to the DSM-5 symptom clusters. A short "strictly DSM-5" version of the RADA showed a two-factor structure-RAD and DSED-and an excellent fit to the data. Scales of both structures showed good-to-excellent internal consistency, interrater reliability, convergent validity, and known-group validity. Classifying the children yielded RAD and DSED rates of <1% and 18%, respectively, for children in foster care and 7% and 10%, respectively, for children in residential care. This study supports the validity of the RADA interview for school-age children and is the first to provide RAD and DSED rates for children in residential care.

反应性依恋障碍和抑制性社会参与障碍评估(RADA)的验证:DSM-5 半结构式访谈。
用于评估反应性依恋障碍(RAD)和抑制性社会参与障碍(DSED)的经验验证工具寥寥无几。RAD和DSED评估访谈(RADA)是一种半结构化诊断访谈,于2018年在CAPA-RAD访谈的基础上进行了更新,以反映《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(第5版;DSM-5)中诊断标准的变化。本研究旨在对加拿大学龄儿童的 RADA 进行验证。来自社区(98 人)、寄养家庭(147 人)和寄宿家庭(123 人)的 5 至 12 岁儿童的照顾者完成了 RADA 访谈和一系列问卷调查。RADA 访谈的确认性因子分析(CFA)支持与 DSM-5 症状群相似的四因子结构。一个简短的 "严格DSM-5 "版本的RADA显示了双因素结构--RAD和DSED,并且与数据非常吻合。这两种结构的量表显示出良好到卓越的内部一致性、分析者之间的可靠性、收敛效度和已知群体效度。对儿童进行分类后,RAD 和 DSED 的比率分别为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信