Individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication have a positive perception of the medication but do not associate it with fracture risk reduction

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Joanna E. M. Sale, Suvabna Theivendrampillai, Denise Linton, Judy Porteous
{"title":"Individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication have a positive perception of the medication but do not associate it with fracture risk reduction","authors":"Joanna E. M. Sale,&nbsp;Suvabna Theivendrampillai,&nbsp;Denise Linton,&nbsp;Judy Porteous","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01449-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>Most participants reported a positive perception of bone active medication despite sustaining a fracture while taking the medication, reporting medication side effects, or having a healthcare provider stop the prescription. Participants did not appear to connect the medication to fracture risk, suggesting this connection should be emphasized by healthcare providers.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our purpose was to examine perceptions about bone active medication from individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this qualitative description study, eligible participants were those who attended an Osteoporosis Canada education session, and reported sustaining a previous fragility fracture and receiving a prescription for bone active medication. We conducted one-on-one interviews and analyzed the data using the analytic hierarchy approach.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We interviewed 32 female participants (age range 58–89 years). Based on our analysis, two themes were developed: (1) most participants spoke positively about bone active medication, indicating they were willing to start, or continue to take, their medication. Positive perceptions were held by participants who sustained a fracture while taking bone active medication, participants whose healthcare provider had stopped the prescription, and participants who reported side effects from the medication; (2) most participants did not discuss bone active medication in relation to their fracture and did not appear to connect the medication to the concept of fracture risk. Instead, participants talked about the medication in relation to bone health in general, or to bone density.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Participants appeared to have positive perceptions of bone active medication, despite sustaining a fracture while taking the medication, reporting medication side effects, or having a healthcare provider stop the prescription. Participants did not connect bone active medication to the concept of fracture risk, illustrating the need for healthcare providers to emphasize the connection between fracture risk and bone active medication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01449-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

Most participants reported a positive perception of bone active medication despite sustaining a fracture while taking the medication, reporting medication side effects, or having a healthcare provider stop the prescription. Participants did not appear to connect the medication to fracture risk, suggesting this connection should be emphasized by healthcare providers.

Objective

Our purpose was to examine perceptions about bone active medication from individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication.

Methods

In this qualitative description study, eligible participants were those who attended an Osteoporosis Canada education session, and reported sustaining a previous fragility fracture and receiving a prescription for bone active medication. We conducted one-on-one interviews and analyzed the data using the analytic hierarchy approach.

Results

We interviewed 32 female participants (age range 58–89 years). Based on our analysis, two themes were developed: (1) most participants spoke positively about bone active medication, indicating they were willing to start, or continue to take, their medication. Positive perceptions were held by participants who sustained a fracture while taking bone active medication, participants whose healthcare provider had stopped the prescription, and participants who reported side effects from the medication; (2) most participants did not discuss bone active medication in relation to their fracture and did not appear to connect the medication to the concept of fracture risk. Instead, participants talked about the medication in relation to bone health in general, or to bone density.

Conclusion

Participants appeared to have positive perceptions of bone active medication, despite sustaining a fracture while taking the medication, reporting medication side effects, or having a healthcare provider stop the prescription. Participants did not connect bone active medication to the concept of fracture risk, illustrating the need for healthcare providers to emphasize the connection between fracture risk and bone active medication.

有脆性骨折并开有骨活性药物处方的人对这种药物有积极的看法,但不会将其与降低骨折风险联系起来。
尽管在服药期间发生了骨折、报告了药物副作用或医疗服务提供者停止了处方,但大多数参与者仍对骨活性药物持积极态度。参与者似乎并未将骨活性药物与骨折风险联系起来,这表明医疗服务提供者应强调这种联系:我们的目的是研究脆性骨折患者和骨活性药物处方者对骨活性药物的看法:在这项定性描述研究中,符合条件的参与者是那些参加过加拿大骨质疏松症教育课程,并表示曾发生过脆性骨折和收到过骨活性药物处方的人。我们进行了一对一访谈,并采用层次分析法对数据进行了分析:我们采访了 32 名女性参与者(年龄在 58-89 岁之间)。根据我们的分析,形成了两个主题:(1)大多数参与者对骨活性药物持积极态度,表示愿意开始或继续服药。在服用骨活性药物期间发生骨折的参与者、医疗服务提供者已停止处方的参与者以及报告了药物副作用的参与者都持有积极的看法;(2)大多数参与者在讨论骨活性药物时并没有将其与骨折联系起来,似乎也没有将药物与骨折风险的概念联系起来。相反,参试者在谈论骨活性药物时一般都与骨骼健康或骨密度有关:结论:尽管参试者在服药期间发生了骨折、报告了药物副作用或医疗服务提供者停止了处方,但他们似乎对骨质疏松症药物有积极的看法。参与者并未将骨活性药物与骨折风险的概念联系起来,这说明医疗服务提供者有必要强调骨折风险与骨活性药物之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信