Benign pericholecystic regeneration mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: a potential pitfall in imaging of cirrhosis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Amir A Borhani, Naishal Patel, Vedang Patel, Maryam Haghshomar, Gregory Grimaldi, Frank H Miller, Katrina McGinty
{"title":"Benign pericholecystic regeneration mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma: a potential pitfall in imaging of cirrhosis.","authors":"Amir A Borhani, Naishal Patel, Vedang Patel, Maryam Haghshomar, Gregory Grimaldi, Frank H Miller, Katrina McGinty","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04618-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several pseudolesions mimicking malignancy have been reported in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Pericholecystic regeneration is among those pseudolesions and can occasionally mimic malignancy. Herein we present a case series comprised of 10 cirrhotic patients (majority due to alcoholic liver disease [ALD] or metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease [MASLD]) with pericholecystic observations initially categorized as highly suspicious for HCC (LR-4 and LR-5) due to their suspicious enhancement pattern which were later proven to be benign based on biopsy, transplantation or imaging criteria (stability of size and morphology on serial CT or MRI for > 2 years). These observations ranged 2-6.3 cm in size, were multiple in most patients and universally resulted in indentations of gallbladder. Arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout, features usually attributed to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), were seen in most patients. However, ancillary features of malignancy such as diffusion restriction, increased T2 signal, and hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase MRI were not present. Pericholecystic observations, in particular in the setting of ALD and MASLD, should be carefully assessed and possibility of pseudolesion should be considered especially when the observations are multiple, cause indentation of gallbladder, and lack ancillary features of malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04618-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several pseudolesions mimicking malignancy have been reported in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Pericholecystic regeneration is among those pseudolesions and can occasionally mimic malignancy. Herein we present a case series comprised of 10 cirrhotic patients (majority due to alcoholic liver disease [ALD] or metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease [MASLD]) with pericholecystic observations initially categorized as highly suspicious for HCC (LR-4 and LR-5) due to their suspicious enhancement pattern which were later proven to be benign based on biopsy, transplantation or imaging criteria (stability of size and morphology on serial CT or MRI for > 2 years). These observations ranged 2-6.3 cm in size, were multiple in most patients and universally resulted in indentations of gallbladder. Arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout, features usually attributed to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), were seen in most patients. However, ancillary features of malignancy such as diffusion restriction, increased T2 signal, and hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase MRI were not present. Pericholecystic observations, in particular in the setting of ALD and MASLD, should be carefully assessed and possibility of pseudolesion should be considered especially when the observations are multiple, cause indentation of gallbladder, and lack ancillary features of malignancy.

模仿肝细胞癌的良性胆囊周围再生:肝硬化成像中的潜在陷阱。
有报道称,肝硬化和非肝硬化患者的肝脏会出现几种假性肿块,模仿恶性肿瘤。胆囊周围再生属于假性胆囊炎的一种,偶尔也会模仿恶性肿瘤。在此,我们介绍了一个病例系列,其中包括10例肝硬化患者(大多数为酒精性肝病[ALD]或代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病[MASLD]),这些患者的孔囊周围因其可疑的强化模式最初被归类为高度可疑的HCC(LR-4和LR-5),但后来根据活检、移植或影像学标准(连续CT或MRI检查的大小和形态稳定超过2年)被证实为良性。这些肿块的大小在 2-6.3 厘米之间,在大多数患者中为多发性,并普遍导致胆囊凹陷。动脉期高强化和冲刷是大多数患者的特征,通常归因于肝细胞癌(HCC)。但是,肝胆相磁共振成像中并未出现弥散受限、T2 信号增强和低密度等恶性肿瘤的辅助特征。应仔细评估胆囊周围的观察结果,尤其是在 ALD 和 MASLD 的情况下,并应考虑假性胆囊炎的可能性,特别是当观察结果是多发性的、导致胆囊凹陷且缺乏恶性肿瘤的辅助特征时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信