Personalized forward collision warning model with learning from human preferences

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Ning Xie , Rongjie Yu , Weili Sun , Shi Qiu , Kailun Zhong , Ming Xu , Guobin Wu , Yi Yang
{"title":"Personalized forward collision warning model with learning from human preferences","authors":"Ning Xie ,&nbsp;Rongjie Yu ,&nbsp;Weili Sun ,&nbsp;Shi Qiu ,&nbsp;Kailun Zhong ,&nbsp;Ming Xu ,&nbsp;Guobin Wu ,&nbsp;Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Forward Collision Warning (FCW) system has been widely equipped on vehicles to reduce rear-end crashes, which are considered the most common type of crash. However, existing FCW systems have the problem of low response rates, which restrict their safety improvement effects. This study aims to address this issue by building personalized FCW models based on human risk preferences. First, a warning feedback index ranks the gaps between drivers’ risk perceptions and FCW models. Then, reward models are developed to characterize the risk perception preferences of each individual driver. After that, the reward models serve as guidelines to fine-tune the benchmark FCW model using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. In the empirical analyses, a total of 95,814 warning fragments collected from 74 drivers are used, and the proposed method generates pseudo warning results. By comparing the pseudo and historical warnings, it shows that the precision of pseudo warning results increases from 53.5% to 78.2%. Furthermore, the average differences between the moment of warning and the moment of braking behavior decrease from 2.4 s to 1.6 s. This demonstrates a higher synchronization level in the timing of risk perception between the personalized FCW models and individual drivers, which enhances the driver’s trust in the warning system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107791"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524003361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Forward Collision Warning (FCW) system has been widely equipped on vehicles to reduce rear-end crashes, which are considered the most common type of crash. However, existing FCW systems have the problem of low response rates, which restrict their safety improvement effects. This study aims to address this issue by building personalized FCW models based on human risk preferences. First, a warning feedback index ranks the gaps between drivers’ risk perceptions and FCW models. Then, reward models are developed to characterize the risk perception preferences of each individual driver. After that, the reward models serve as guidelines to fine-tune the benchmark FCW model using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. In the empirical analyses, a total of 95,814 warning fragments collected from 74 drivers are used, and the proposed method generates pseudo warning results. By comparing the pseudo and historical warnings, it shows that the precision of pseudo warning results increases from 53.5% to 78.2%. Furthermore, the average differences between the moment of warning and the moment of braking behavior decrease from 2.4 s to 1.6 s. This demonstrates a higher synchronization level in the timing of risk perception between the personalized FCW models and individual drivers, which enhances the driver’s trust in the warning system.
从人类偏好中学习的个性化前撞预警模型。
前撞预警(FCW)系统已被广泛安装在车辆上,以减少被认为是最常见的碰撞类型--追尾碰撞。然而,现有的 FCW 系统存在响应率低的问题,从而限制了其安全改进效果。本研究旨在通过建立基于人类风险偏好的个性化 FCW 模型来解决这一问题。首先,警告反馈指数对驾驶员的风险感知与 FCW 模型之间的差距进行排名。然后,开发奖励模型来描述每个驾驶员的风险感知偏好。之后,以奖励模型为指导,使用近端策略优化(PPO)算法对基准 FCW 模型进行微调。在实证分析中,共使用了从 74 名驾驶员处收集的 95,814 个警告片段,并使用所提出的方法生成了伪警告结果。通过比较伪警告和历史警告,结果表明伪警告结果的精确度从 53.5% 提高到 78.2%。此外,警告时刻与制动行为时刻之间的平均差异从 2.4 秒降至 1.6 秒,这表明个性化 FCW 模型与个体驾驶员在风险感知时间上的同步程度更高,从而增强了驾驶员对警告系统的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信