Causal relationship between Lipdome and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Mendelian randomization.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
3 Biotech Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s13205-024-04071-x
Qiong Wu, Jingmin Fu, Cheng Zhang, Zhuolin Liu, Jianing Shi, Zhiying Feng, Kangyu Wang, Ling Li
{"title":"Causal relationship between Lipdome and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Mendelian randomization.","authors":"Qiong Wu, Jingmin Fu, Cheng Zhang, Zhuolin Liu, Jianing Shi, Zhiying Feng, Kangyu Wang, Ling Li","doi":"10.1007/s13205-024-04071-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic risk significantly influence susceptibility and heterogeneity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, and increasing evidence suggests their close association with lipdome. However, their causal relationship remains unclear. In this study, we conducted a two-sample MR (Mendelian randomization) analysis using publicly available large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data to evaluate the causal impact of lipdome on COPD and asthma. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analysis method, and multiple sensitivity and heterogeneity tests were performed to assess the reliability of the results. Finally, a Meta-analysis was conducted on lipdome with significant causal relationships to validate the robustness of the results. Our findings suggest that Sterol ester (27:1/18:2), Phosphatidylcholine (15:0_18:2), (16:0_18:2), (16:0_20:2), (17:0_18:2), (18:1_18:1), (18:1_18:2), (18:1_20:2), Triacylglycerol (54:3), and (56:4) levels are protective factors for COPD, while levels of Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_22:5), (18:0_20:4), and (O-16:0_20:4) are risk factors for COPD. Meta-analysis of lipids causally related to COPD also indicates significant results. Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4), (16:0_22:5), and (18:0_20:4) levels are risk factors for asthma, while Phosphatidylcholine (18:1_18:2), (18:1_20:2), and Sphingomyelin (d38:1) levels are protective factors for asthma. However, the lack of statistical significance in the Meta-analysis may be due to heterogeneity in research methods and data statistics. This study indicates that 4 lipdome species have significant correlations with COPD and asthma. Phosphatidylcholine (18:1_18:2) and (18:1_20:2) are protective factors, while Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_22:5) and (18:0_20:4) are risk factors. Additionally, due to differences in molecular subtypes, phosphatidylcholine, sterol ester, and triacylglycerol exhibit differential effects on the diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7067,"journal":{"name":"3 Biotech","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3 Biotech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-04071-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic risk significantly influence susceptibility and heterogeneity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, and increasing evidence suggests their close association with lipdome. However, their causal relationship remains unclear. In this study, we conducted a two-sample MR (Mendelian randomization) analysis using publicly available large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data to evaluate the causal impact of lipdome on COPD and asthma. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analysis method, and multiple sensitivity and heterogeneity tests were performed to assess the reliability of the results. Finally, a Meta-analysis was conducted on lipdome with significant causal relationships to validate the robustness of the results. Our findings suggest that Sterol ester (27:1/18:2), Phosphatidylcholine (15:0_18:2), (16:0_18:2), (16:0_20:2), (17:0_18:2), (18:1_18:1), (18:1_18:2), (18:1_20:2), Triacylglycerol (54:3), and (56:4) levels are protective factors for COPD, while levels of Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_22:5), (18:0_20:4), and (O-16:0_20:4) are risk factors for COPD. Meta-analysis of lipids causally related to COPD also indicates significant results. Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_20:4), (16:0_22:5), and (18:0_20:4) levels are risk factors for asthma, while Phosphatidylcholine (18:1_18:2), (18:1_20:2), and Sphingomyelin (d38:1) levels are protective factors for asthma. However, the lack of statistical significance in the Meta-analysis may be due to heterogeneity in research methods and data statistics. This study indicates that 4 lipdome species have significant correlations with COPD and asthma. Phosphatidylcholine (18:1_18:2) and (18:1_20:2) are protective factors, while Phosphatidylcholine (16:0_22:5) and (18:0_20:4) are risk factors. Additionally, due to differences in molecular subtypes, phosphatidylcholine, sterol ester, and triacylglycerol exhibit differential effects on the diseases.

脂质体与慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘之间的因果关系:孟德尔随机化
遗传风险极大地影响了慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和哮喘的易感性和异质性,越来越多的证据表明它们与唇腭裂密切相关。然而,它们之间的因果关系仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们利用公开的大规模全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据进行了双样本 MR(孟德尔随机化)分析,以评估唇穹对慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘的因果影响。反方差加权法(IVW)作为主要分析方法,并进行了多重敏感性和异质性测试,以评估结果的可靠性。最后,我们对具有显著因果关系的脂质体进行了元分析,以验证结果的稳健性。我们的研究结果表明,甾醇酯(27:1/18:2)、磷脂酰胆碱(15:0_18:2)、(16:0_18:2)、(16:0_20:2)、(17:0_18:2)、(18:1_18:1)、(18:1_18:2)、(18:1_20:2)、三酰甘油(54:3)和(56:4)水平是慢性阻塞性肺病的保护因素,而磷脂酰胆碱(16:0_22:5)、(18:0_20:4)和(O-16:0_20:4)水平则是慢性阻塞性肺病的危险因素。对与慢性阻塞性肺病有因果关系的脂质进行的元分析也显示出显著的结果。磷脂酰胆碱(16:0_20:4)、(16:0_22:5)和(18:0_20:4)水平是哮喘的危险因素,而磷脂酰胆碱(18:1_18:2)、(18:1_20:2)和鞘磷脂(d38:1)水平则是哮喘的保护因素。然而,Meta 分析中缺乏统计学意义可能是由于研究方法和数据统计的异质性。本研究表明,4 种脂质与慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘有显著相关性。磷脂酰胆碱(18:1_18:2)和(18:1_20:2)是保护因素,而磷脂酰胆碱(16:0_22:5)和(18:0_20:4)是危险因素。此外,由于分子亚型的不同,磷脂酰胆碱、甾醇酯和三酰甘油对疾病的影响也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
3 Biotech
3 Biotech Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
314
期刊介绍: 3 Biotech publishes the results of the latest research related to the study and application of biotechnology to: - Medicine and Biomedical Sciences - Agriculture - The Environment The focus on these three technology sectors recognizes that complete Biotechnology applications often require a combination of techniques. 3 Biotech not only presents the latest developments in biotechnology but also addresses the problems and benefits of integrating a variety of techniques for a particular application. 3 Biotech will appeal to scientists and engineers in both academia and industry focused on the safe and efficient application of Biotechnology to Medicine, Agriculture and the Environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信