Midterm results after allogeneic simple limbal epithelial transplantation from deceased-donor eyes in patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects due to limbal stem cell deficiency.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jana C Riedl, Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik, Bert C Giers, Francesco Buonfiglio, Norbert Pfeiffer, Aytan Musayeva, Adrian Gericke
{"title":"Midterm results after allogeneic simple limbal epithelial transplantation from deceased-donor eyes in patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects due to limbal stem cell deficiency.","authors":"Jana C Riedl, Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik, Bert C Giers, Francesco Buonfiglio, Norbert Pfeiffer, Aytan Musayeva, Adrian Gericke","doi":"10.1111/aos.16760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to characterize the clinical outcomes after allogeneic simple limbal epithelial transplantation (alloSLET) utilizing tissue from cadaveric donor eyes to address persistent corneal epithelial defects caused by limbal stem cell deficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 20 patients, encompassing 24 eyes, who underwent alloSLET at least 2 years prior. The primary endpoint was the achievement of complete epithelialization of the corneal surface by corneal epithelium. Secondary endpoints included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median postoperative follow-up period was 36 months (range, 24-74 months). At 1, 3 and 6 months post-surgery, 96% of eyes demonstrated epithelialized corneal surfaces, which declined to 71% at 12 months, to 54% at 24 and 36 months after surgery, and to 50% thereafter. There were no significant differences in graft survival between alloSLET performed alone versus in combination with penetrating keratoplasty. However, instances of graft failure were associated with postoperative elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and a history of multiple amniotic membrane and corneal graft transplants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AlloSLET emerges as a viable mid-term intervention for limbal stem cell deficiency-associated non-healing corneal epithelial defects in the absence of autologous limbal tissue. Our findings underscore the increased risk of graft failure in patients with elevated IOP and a background of multiple previous amniotic membrane and corneal graft procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to characterize the clinical outcomes after allogeneic simple limbal epithelial transplantation (alloSLET) utilizing tissue from cadaveric donor eyes to address persistent corneal epithelial defects caused by limbal stem cell deficiency.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 20 patients, encompassing 24 eyes, who underwent alloSLET at least 2 years prior. The primary endpoint was the achievement of complete epithelialization of the corneal surface by corneal epithelium. Secondary endpoints included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and postoperative adverse events.

Results: The median postoperative follow-up period was 36 months (range, 24-74 months). At 1, 3 and 6 months post-surgery, 96% of eyes demonstrated epithelialized corneal surfaces, which declined to 71% at 12 months, to 54% at 24 and 36 months after surgery, and to 50% thereafter. There were no significant differences in graft survival between alloSLET performed alone versus in combination with penetrating keratoplasty. However, instances of graft failure were associated with postoperative elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and a history of multiple amniotic membrane and corneal graft transplants.

Conclusions: AlloSLET emerges as a viable mid-term intervention for limbal stem cell deficiency-associated non-healing corneal epithelial defects in the absence of autologous limbal tissue. Our findings underscore the increased risk of graft failure in patients with elevated IOP and a background of multiple previous amniotic membrane and corneal graft procedures.

因角膜缘干细胞缺乏而导致角膜上皮持续缺损的患者接受异体单纯角膜缘上皮移植后的中期效果。
背景:本研究旨在描述异体单纯角膜缘上皮移植(allloSLET)后的临床结果,该移植利用尸体供体眼球组织解决角膜缘干细胞缺乏引起的持续性角膜上皮缺损问题:我们对至少 2 年前接受过 alloSLET 的 20 名患者(共 24 只眼)的医疗记录进行了回顾性分析。主要终点是角膜上皮完全上皮化。次要终点包括矫正距离视力(CDVA)和术后不良反应:术后随访期的中位数为 36 个月(24-74 个月)。术后1、3和6个月时,96%的眼睛显示角膜表面上皮化,术后12个月时下降到71%,术后24和36个月时下降到54%,此后下降到50%。在移植物存活率方面,单独进行的 alloSLET 与结合穿透性角膜移植术进行的 alloSLET 没有明显差异。不过,移植物失败与术后眼压(IOP)升高以及多次羊膜和角膜移植物移植史有关:AlloSLET是在缺乏自体角膜缘组织的情况下,治疗角膜缘干细胞缺乏相关的角膜上皮缺损不愈合的一种可行的中期干预方法。我们的研究结果表明,对于眼压升高、既往接受过多次羊膜和角膜移植手术的患者,移植失败的风险会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信