Comparative toxicity of oral exposure to paraquat: Survival rates and gene expression in two honey bees species; Apis mellifera and Apis cerana.

IF 7.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Pollution Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125026
Patcharin Phokasem, Terd Disayathanoowat, Thunyarat Chantaphanwattana, Chainarong Sinpoo, Yan Ping Chen, Jay D Evans, Ji-Ho Lee, Sasiprapa Krongdang
{"title":"Comparative toxicity of oral exposure to paraquat: Survival rates and gene expression in two honey bees species; Apis mellifera and Apis cerana.","authors":"Patcharin Phokasem, Terd Disayathanoowat, Thunyarat Chantaphanwattana, Chainarong Sinpoo, Yan Ping Chen, Jay D Evans, Ji-Ho Lee, Sasiprapa Krongdang","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Honey bees provide vital pollination services to agricultural crops and wild plants worldwide. Unfortunately, the misuse and overuse of pesticides in agricultural production have led to an increase in incidents harming honey bees in recent years. Among the commonly utilized bee species in beekeeping are Apis cerana and Apis mellifera, with wild A. cerana populations widely dispersed in forests, contributing substantially to ecosystem balance. Yet, the impact of paraquat, a toxic herbicide, on A. cerana remains largely unexplored. This study aims to address this gap by examining acute exposure endpoints based on mortality represented by median lethal doses (LD<sub>50</sub> values) of paraquat, survival rates, and gene expression patterns between the A. cerana and A. mellifera. The findings revealed that A. cerana exhibits greater sensitivity to paraquat compared to A. mellifera. The acute oral LD<sub>50</sub> values for A. cerana were 5.85, 1.74, and 1.21 μg/bee at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for A. mellifera were 104.00, 11.00, and 6.41 μg/bee. Further, the study demonstrated significant upregulation of the detoxification (antioxidative) enzymes SOD1, CAT, and LLDH-X2 in both A. mellifera and A. cerana following exposure to the lethal dose of paraquat. However, SOD2 expression was notably downregulated in both species, indicating potential mitochondrial damage. These findings suggest that while honey bees initiate activate defense mechanisms against oxidative damage, paraquat exposure may still impair mitochondrial function. Paraquat was found to be moderately toxic to A. mellifera but highly toxic to A. cerana, indicating the importance of screening multiple bee species when assessing the risks of chemical exposure. This research provides a rare comparative analysis of chemical stress effects on morbidity and gene expression in two different honey bee species, establishing a foundational framework for risk assessment and the regulation of herbicide risks to pollinating insects.</p>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":" ","pages":"125026"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Honey bees provide vital pollination services to agricultural crops and wild plants worldwide. Unfortunately, the misuse and overuse of pesticides in agricultural production have led to an increase in incidents harming honey bees in recent years. Among the commonly utilized bee species in beekeeping are Apis cerana and Apis mellifera, with wild A. cerana populations widely dispersed in forests, contributing substantially to ecosystem balance. Yet, the impact of paraquat, a toxic herbicide, on A. cerana remains largely unexplored. This study aims to address this gap by examining acute exposure endpoints based on mortality represented by median lethal doses (LD50 values) of paraquat, survival rates, and gene expression patterns between the A. cerana and A. mellifera. The findings revealed that A. cerana exhibits greater sensitivity to paraquat compared to A. mellifera. The acute oral LD50 values for A. cerana were 5.85, 1.74, and 1.21 μg/bee at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for A. mellifera were 104.00, 11.00, and 6.41 μg/bee. Further, the study demonstrated significant upregulation of the detoxification (antioxidative) enzymes SOD1, CAT, and LLDH-X2 in both A. mellifera and A. cerana following exposure to the lethal dose of paraquat. However, SOD2 expression was notably downregulated in both species, indicating potential mitochondrial damage. These findings suggest that while honey bees initiate activate defense mechanisms against oxidative damage, paraquat exposure may still impair mitochondrial function. Paraquat was found to be moderately toxic to A. mellifera but highly toxic to A. cerana, indicating the importance of screening multiple bee species when assessing the risks of chemical exposure. This research provides a rare comparative analysis of chemical stress effects on morbidity and gene expression in two different honey bee species, establishing a foundational framework for risk assessment and the regulation of herbicide risks to pollinating insects.

口服百草枯的毒性比较:两种蜜蜂(Apis mellifera 和 Apis cerana)的存活率和基因表达。
蜜蜂为世界各地的农作物和野生植物提供重要的授粉服务。不幸的是,近年来,农业生产中滥用和过度使用杀虫剂导致伤害蜜蜂的事件不断增加。养蜂业中常用的蜜蜂品种有蜂王浆蜂(Apis cerana)和蜂王浆蜂(Apis mellifera),野生蜂王浆蜂种群广泛分布于森林中,为生态系统平衡做出了巨大贡献。然而,百草枯这种有毒除草剂对陶瓷蜂的影响在很大程度上仍未得到研究。本研究旨在通过研究急性暴露终点(以百草枯中位致死剂量(LD50值)代表的死亡率)、存活率以及A. cerana和A. mellifera之间的基因表达模式来填补这一空白。研究结果表明,与 A. mellifera 相比,A. cerana 对百草枯更敏感。在 24、48 和 72 小时内,A. cerana 的急性口服半数致死剂量分别为 5.85、1.74 和 1.21 μg/只蜜蜂,而 A. mellifera 的相应剂量分别为 104.00、11.00 和 6.41 μg/只蜜蜂。此外,研究还表明,在暴露于致死剂量的百草枯后,A. mellifera 和 A. cerana 的解毒(抗氧化)酶 SOD1、CAT 和 LLDH-X2 都出现了显著的上调。然而,SOD2 的表达在这两个物种中都明显下调,表明线粒体可能受到损伤。这些研究结果表明,虽然蜜蜂会启动防御机制来抵御氧化损伤,但接触百草枯仍可能会损害线粒体功能。研究发现,百草枯对蜜蜂有中度毒性,但对蜜蜂有高度毒性,这表明在评估接触化学品的风险时,筛选多个蜜蜂物种非常重要。这项研究罕见地比较分析了化学胁迫对两个不同蜜蜂物种的发病率和基因表达的影响,为授粉昆虫的风险评估和除草剂风险监管建立了一个基础框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信