David J Disabato, Emily A Gawlik, Pallavi Aurora, Karin G Coifman
{"title":"Unpacking the components of positive affect variability: Implications for psychological health across contexts.","authors":"David J Disabato, Emily A Gawlik, Pallavi Aurora, Karin G Coifman","doi":"10.1037/emo0001416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research suggests variability of positive affect (PA), or the degree to which an individual's experience of PA is variable rather than stable, is associated with worse psychological health. However, it is unclear whether different aspects of PA variability serve different psychological functions. One possibility is that changes in PA in response to rewarding contexts, or PA reactivity, serve a healthy function, while general instability of PA from one moment to the next serves an unhealthy function. The current investigation separated out PA reactivity to pleasant activities from general PA instability. We tested associations in three experience-sampling studies collected between 2012 and 2020 (<i>N</i> = 323). An internal meta-analysis revealed a significant association between PA reactivity to pleasant activities and <i>less</i> well-being. Moderation by average levels of PA was present but inconsistent across studies. We discuss how PA reactions to rewarding contexts may <i>not</i> necessarily reflect healthy emotion regulation and consider that \"mood brightening\" effects in daily life may indicate ill-being rather than well-being. Caution is warranted when interpreting the primary findings, as the indirect effect of PA reactivity was significant in only one of the three individual studies, and the effect was only found for the outcome of well-being and not distress. Results can be most confidently generalized to White adults living in the Midwest region of the United States. Future research should test not only the intensity of PA reactivity to rewarding contexts but also how long a person can sustain elevated PA-in relation to psychological health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior research suggests variability of positive affect (PA), or the degree to which an individual's experience of PA is variable rather than stable, is associated with worse psychological health. However, it is unclear whether different aspects of PA variability serve different psychological functions. One possibility is that changes in PA in response to rewarding contexts, or PA reactivity, serve a healthy function, while general instability of PA from one moment to the next serves an unhealthy function. The current investigation separated out PA reactivity to pleasant activities from general PA instability. We tested associations in three experience-sampling studies collected between 2012 and 2020 (N = 323). An internal meta-analysis revealed a significant association between PA reactivity to pleasant activities and less well-being. Moderation by average levels of PA was present but inconsistent across studies. We discuss how PA reactions to rewarding contexts may not necessarily reflect healthy emotion regulation and consider that "mood brightening" effects in daily life may indicate ill-being rather than well-being. Caution is warranted when interpreting the primary findings, as the indirect effect of PA reactivity was significant in only one of the three individual studies, and the effect was only found for the outcome of well-being and not distress. Results can be most confidently generalized to White adults living in the Midwest region of the United States. Future research should test not only the intensity of PA reactivity to rewarding contexts but also how long a person can sustain elevated PA-in relation to psychological health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
先前的研究表明,积极情绪(PA)的可变性,或者说一个人的积极情绪体验可变而非稳定的程度,与心理健康状况的恶化有关。然而,目前还不清楚积极情感变化的不同方面是否具有不同的心理功能。一种可能的情况是,PA 对奖励情境的响应变化或 PA 反应性具有健康功能,而 PA 从一而终的普遍不稳定性则具有不健康功能。目前的调查将对愉快活动的反应性与一般的反应性不稳定性区分开来。我们在 2012 年至 2020 年间收集的三项经验取样研究中测试了两者之间的关联(N = 323)。一项内部荟萃分析显示,愉快活动的 PA 反应性与幸福感较低之间存在显著关联。平均 PA 水平的调节作用是存在的,但在不同研究中并不一致。我们讨论了对有益情境的 PA 反应不一定能反映健康的情绪调节,并认为日常生活中的 "情绪提振 "效应可能预示着不健康而非幸福。在解释主要研究结果时需要谨慎,因为在三项单独的研究中,只有一项研究的PA反应性的间接效应是显著的,而且该效应只对幸福感而非痛苦的结果有影响。研究结果最有信心推广到生活在美国中西部地区的白人成年人。未来的研究不仅要测试PA对奖励情境的反应强度,还要测试一个人能够维持多长时间的PA升高--这与心理健康有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。