Telehealth in Home Visiting for New Mothers: Are Outcomes Different if the First Visits Are in Person?

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Margaret L Holland, Dorothy J Fitch, Drishtant Regmi, Lois S Sadler
{"title":"Telehealth in Home Visiting for New Mothers: Are Outcomes Different if the First Visits Are in Person?","authors":"Margaret L Holland, Dorothy J Fitch, Drishtant Regmi, Lois S Sadler","doi":"10.1007/s11121-024-01731-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Home visiting programs for new parents have a broad range of goals, including improvements in maternal and child health, reductions in child maltreatment, and improvements in child development. Before 2020, few home visits were conducted through phone or video encounters, i.e., telehealth home visiting (teleHV). However, rapid adoption of teleHV was required by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To understand how conducting initial visits via teleHV was associated with outcomes, we performed a secondary data analysis to make use of the natural experiment created by COVID-19. Utilizing data from the Nurse-Family Partnership, a US national evidence-based model, we compared outcomes for families whose initial home visits were in person (enrolled 10/2019 to 1/2020; n = 7066) to those whose first visits were through teleHV (enrolled 4/2020 to 12/2020; n = 14,587). TeleHV at intake was associated with a higher likelihood of elevated depressive symptoms at 12 months (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.07, 1.76), a lower likelihood of retention to child's age 12 months (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.58, 0.78), a higher likelihood of early drop from the program (OR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.48, 2.12), and fewer screening assessments completed (b =  - 0.06; 95% CI - 0.07, - 0.04). No differences were detected between groups for the likelihood of breastfeeding at child's age 6 months, elevated intimate partner violence (IPV) risk, 90% of attempted visits completed, or time to attrition. COVID-19 may have led families in different groups to have different experiences during key points of child development; however, as both groups' involvement in the program occurred primarily during the pandemic, they were both subject to comparable influences. These findings suggest that in-person visits have some advantages in the first months of program involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-024-01731-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Home visiting programs for new parents have a broad range of goals, including improvements in maternal and child health, reductions in child maltreatment, and improvements in child development. Before 2020, few home visits were conducted through phone or video encounters, i.e., telehealth home visiting (teleHV). However, rapid adoption of teleHV was required by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To understand how conducting initial visits via teleHV was associated with outcomes, we performed a secondary data analysis to make use of the natural experiment created by COVID-19. Utilizing data from the Nurse-Family Partnership, a US national evidence-based model, we compared outcomes for families whose initial home visits were in person (enrolled 10/2019 to 1/2020; n = 7066) to those whose first visits were through teleHV (enrolled 4/2020 to 12/2020; n = 14,587). TeleHV at intake was associated with a higher likelihood of elevated depressive symptoms at 12 months (OR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.07, 1.76), a lower likelihood of retention to child's age 12 months (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.58, 0.78), a higher likelihood of early drop from the program (OR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.48, 2.12), and fewer screening assessments completed (b =  - 0.06; 95% CI - 0.07, - 0.04). No differences were detected between groups for the likelihood of breastfeeding at child's age 6 months, elevated intimate partner violence (IPV) risk, 90% of attempted visits completed, or time to attrition. COVID-19 may have led families in different groups to have different experiences during key points of child development; however, as both groups' involvement in the program occurred primarily during the pandemic, they were both subject to comparable influences. These findings suggest that in-person visits have some advantages in the first months of program involvement.

远程医疗在新妈妈家访中的应用:如果首次探访是面对面的,结果会有不同吗?
针对新生儿父母的家访计划具有广泛的目标,包括改善母婴健康、减少虐待儿童现象以及改善儿童发展。在 2020 年之前,很少有家访是通过电话或视频会面进行的,即远程健康家访(teleHV)。然而,2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行要求迅速采用远程家访。为了了解通过远程医疗进行初次家访与结果之间的关系,我们利用 COVID-19 创造的自然实验进行了二次数据分析。利用美国国家循证模式 "护士-家庭伙伴关系"(Nurse-Family Partnership)的数据,我们比较了首次家访为亲自到访的家庭(注册时间为 2019 年 10 月 10 日至 2020 年 1 月 1 日;n = 7066)与首次家访为远程医疗的家庭(注册时间为 2020 年 4 月 4 日至 2020 年 12 月 12 日;n = 14587)的结果。入院时进行远程会诊与以下因素相关:12 个月时抑郁症状升高的可能性较高(OR = 1.37;95% CI 1.07,1.76),保留至儿童 12 个月大的可能性较低(OR = 0.67;95% CI 0.58,0.78),提前退出计划的可能性较高(OR = 1.77;95% CI 1.48,2.12),以及完成的筛查评估较少(b = - 0.06;95% CI - 0.07,- 0.04)。在儿童 6 个月大时母乳喂养的可能性、亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 风险升高、完成 90% 的尝试性访视或流失时间方面,未发现组间存在差异。COVID-19 可能导致不同组别的家庭在儿童成长的关键时期有不同的经历;但是,由于两组家庭参与该计划的时间主要是在大流行期间,因此他们受到的影响不相上下。这些研究结果表明,在参与计划的最初几个月,面对面访问具有一定的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信