Review of Local Homeless Mortality Efforts: A Call for Standardized Data and Reporting.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ashley A Meehan, Ben T King, Rachel Biggs, Alaina P Boyer, Lauryn Berner-Davis, Barbara DiPietro
{"title":"Review of Local Homeless Mortality Efforts: A Call for Standardized Data and Reporting.","authors":"Ashley A Meehan, Ben T King, Rachel Biggs, Alaina P Boyer, Lauryn Berner-Davis, Barbara DiPietro","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There are currently no national estimates of how many people die while unhoused in the US. Local jurisdictions have developed their own approaches for estimating homeless mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to examine these local approaches, document what is known about homeless mortality, and summarize local methodologies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We reviewed 17 publicly available homeless mortality reports (ie, gray literature).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Reports were sought from government, Health Care for the Homeless, coalition to end homelessness, and other advocacy and social service websites.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>From each report, we extracted the number of homeless deaths, dates of observation, data source(s) used, determination of homeless status, manners and causes of death, and decedent demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data collection and reporting on homeless mortality varied greatly across reports. This variation limits aggregation across reports. Medical examiner data was the most used data source. Manner of death was the most consistently collected field, with accidental deaths reported as the most prevalent manner of homeless deaths. Not all reports listed specific causes of death, but those that did reported toxicity (eg, overdose) and cardiovascular causes as most prevalent. The most granular age category of most homeless decedents was 40 to 60 years. On average, 80% of decedents were of male sex. While over half of reports included race and ethnicity information, disparities could not be estimated without suitable denominators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized data collection and reporting guidance is needed for homeless mortality. Health departments can work with local Health Care for the Homeless programs and Continuums of Care to establish data sharing processes. Matching vital statistics with homeless service utilization records may be one opportunity to improve these efforts. Until there is federal or national guidance on these standards, localities can consider adding housing or homelessness variables as optional or mandatory fields in electronic death reporting systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: There are currently no national estimates of how many people die while unhoused in the US. Local jurisdictions have developed their own approaches for estimating homeless mortality.

Objective: We aimed to examine these local approaches, document what is known about homeless mortality, and summarize local methodologies.

Design: We reviewed 17 publicly available homeless mortality reports (ie, gray literature).

Setting: Reports were sought from government, Health Care for the Homeless, coalition to end homelessness, and other advocacy and social service websites.

Main outcome: From each report, we extracted the number of homeless deaths, dates of observation, data source(s) used, determination of homeless status, manners and causes of death, and decedent demographics.

Results: Data collection and reporting on homeless mortality varied greatly across reports. This variation limits aggregation across reports. Medical examiner data was the most used data source. Manner of death was the most consistently collected field, with accidental deaths reported as the most prevalent manner of homeless deaths. Not all reports listed specific causes of death, but those that did reported toxicity (eg, overdose) and cardiovascular causes as most prevalent. The most granular age category of most homeless decedents was 40 to 60 years. On average, 80% of decedents were of male sex. While over half of reports included race and ethnicity information, disparities could not be estimated without suitable denominators.

Conclusions: Standardized data collection and reporting guidance is needed for homeless mortality. Health departments can work with local Health Care for the Homeless programs and Continuums of Care to establish data sharing processes. Matching vital statistics with homeless service utilization records may be one opportunity to improve these efforts. Until there is federal or national guidance on these standards, localities can consider adding housing or homelessness variables as optional or mandatory fields in electronic death reporting systems.

地方无家可归者死亡率工作回顾:呼吁标准化数据和报告。
背景:目前,美国还没有关于无家可归者死亡人数的全国性估计。地方辖区已制定了自己的方法来估算无家可归者的死亡率:我们旨在研究这些地方方法,记录有关无家可归者死亡率的已知信息,并总结地方方法:我们审查了 17 份公开发表的无家可归者死亡率报告(即灰色文献):报告来自政府、无家可归者医疗保健组织、结束无家可归者联盟以及其他宣传和社会服务网站:我们从每份报告中提取了无家可归者的死亡人数、观察日期、使用的数据源、无家可归者身份的确定、死亡方式和原因以及死者的人口统计学特征:不同报告在无家可归者死亡率的数据收集和报告方面存在很大差异。这种差异限制了各报告之间的汇总。法医数据是使用最多的数据来源。死亡方式是收集最一致的领域,据报告,意外死亡是无家可归者最常见的死亡方式。并非所有报告都列出了具体死因,但列出具体死因的报告称,毒性(如用药过量)和心血管疾病是最常见的死因。大多数无家可归者死者的最细分年龄段为 40 至 60 岁。平均而言,80%的死者为男性。虽然半数以上的报告包含种族和民族信息,但如果没有合适的分母,就无法估计差异:结论:需要针对无家可归者死亡率制定标准化的数据收集和报告指南。卫生部门可以与当地的无家可归者医疗保健计划和持续护理计划合作,建立数据共享流程。将生命统计数据与无家可归者服务使用记录相匹配可能是改进这些工作的一个机会。在联邦或国家就这些标准提供指导之前,地方可以考虑在电子死亡报告系统中添加住房或无家可归变量,作为可选或必选字段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信