Evolution of treatment options for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Tao Ren, Jia-Hui Guan, Yu Li, Nan-Nan Li, Zheng Li
{"title":"Evolution of treatment options for juvenile idiopathic arthritis.","authors":"Tao Ren, Jia-Hui Guan, Yu Li, Nan-Nan Li, Zheng Li","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i9.831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent study published in <i>World J Clin Cases</i> addressed the optimal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Herein, we outline the progress in drug therapy of JIA. NSAIDs have traditionally been the primary treatment for all forms of JIA. NSAIDs are symptom-relief medications, and well tolerated by patients. Additionally, the availability of selective NSAIDs further lower the gastrointestinal adverse reactions compared with traditional NSAIDs. Glucocorticoid is another kind of symptom-relief medications with potent anti-inflammatory effect. However, the frequent adverse events limit the clinical use. Both NSAIDs and glucocorticoid fail to ease or prevent joint damage, and the breakthrough comes along with the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). DMARDs can prevent disease progression and reduce joint destruction. Particularly, the emergence of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) has truly revolutionized the therapeutics of JIA, compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs. As a newly developed class of drugs, the places of most bDMARDs in the management of JIA remain to be well established. Nevertheless, the continuous evolution of bDMARDs raises hopes of improving long-term disease outcomes for JIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"15 9","pages":"831-835"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i9.831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent study published in World J Clin Cases addressed the optimal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Herein, we outline the progress in drug therapy of JIA. NSAIDs have traditionally been the primary treatment for all forms of JIA. NSAIDs are symptom-relief medications, and well tolerated by patients. Additionally, the availability of selective NSAIDs further lower the gastrointestinal adverse reactions compared with traditional NSAIDs. Glucocorticoid is another kind of symptom-relief medications with potent anti-inflammatory effect. However, the frequent adverse events limit the clinical use. Both NSAIDs and glucocorticoid fail to ease or prevent joint damage, and the breakthrough comes along with the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). DMARDs can prevent disease progression and reduce joint destruction. Particularly, the emergence of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) has truly revolutionized the therapeutics of JIA, compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs. As a newly developed class of drugs, the places of most bDMARDs in the management of JIA remain to be well established. Nevertheless, the continuous evolution of bDMARDs raises hopes of improving long-term disease outcomes for JIA.

幼年特发性关节炎治疗方案的演变。
最近发表在《世界临床病例杂志》(World J Clin Cases)上的一项研究探讨了治疗幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)的最佳非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。在此,我们概述了 JIA 药物治疗的进展。非甾体抗炎药历来是治疗各种类型 JIA 的主要药物。非甾体抗炎药是缓解症状的药物,患者耐受性良好。此外,与传统的非甾体抗炎药相比,选择性非甾体抗炎药的出现进一步降低了胃肠道不良反应。糖皮质激素是另一种具有强效抗炎作用的缓解症状药物。然而,频繁的不良反应限制了其临床应用。非甾体抗炎药和糖皮质激素都无法缓解或预防关节损伤,而改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)则是突破口。DMARDs可以预防疾病进展,减少关节破坏。特别是生物 DMARDs(bDMARDs)的出现,与传统的合成 DMARDs 相比,真正彻底改变了 JIA 的治疗方法。作为一类新开发的药物,大多数生物 DMARDs 在 JIA 治疗中的地位仍有待确立。然而,bDMARDs的不断发展为改善JIA的长期疾病治疗效果带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信