Conservative management of spinal pathology with autologous conditioned serum: A systematic review of the literature.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Christian J Rajkovic, Matthew L Merckling, Alyssa W Lee, Galadu Subah, Aryan Malhotra, Zachary D Thomas, Sabrina L Zeller, John V Wainwright, Merritt D Kinon
{"title":"Conservative management of spinal pathology with autologous conditioned serum: A systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Christian J Rajkovic, Matthew L Merckling, Alyssa W Lee, Galadu Subah, Aryan Malhotra, Zachary D Thomas, Sabrina L Zeller, John V Wainwright, Merritt D Kinon","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i9.870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic inflammatory pain is associated with increased expression of interleukin (IL)-1, an inflammatory cytokine, and activity on its receptor (IL-1R). In response, the body produces IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra) to reduce this signaling. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) is the only biologic therapy for spinal pathologies that enhances the action of endogenous IL-1Ra reserves to improve symptoms. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of ACS in treating pain and disability caused by spinal pathologies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the use of ACS as a conservative management option for spinal pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of PubMed/Medline was performed to identify studies investigating administration of ACS for treatment of any spinal pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included, comprising 684 patients treated with epidural (<i>n</i> = 133) or transforaminal (<i>n</i> = 551) ACS injections. Patients had an average age of 54.0 years with slight female predominance (53.2%). The lumbar spine was most commonly treated, with 567 patients (82.9%) receiving injections for lumbar radiculopathy (<i>n</i> = 67), degenerative disc disease (DDD) (<i>n</i> = 372), or spinal stenosis (<i>n</i> = 128); cervical injections were performed in 109 patients (15.9%). Mean (SD) follow-up was 21.7 (4.8) weeks from first ACS injection. All studies investigating mechanical lumbar and lumbar or cervical radicular pain reported significant pain reduction at final follow-up compared to baseline. ACS achieved comparable or superior results to lumbar epidural steroid injections. Adverse events were reported in 21 patients (3.1%), with no serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACS injection is a safe and effective intervention for pain reduction in many spinal pathologies, including cervical and lumbar radiculopathies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"15 9","pages":"870-881"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i9.870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic inflammatory pain is associated with increased expression of interleukin (IL)-1, an inflammatory cytokine, and activity on its receptor (IL-1R). In response, the body produces IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra) to reduce this signaling. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) is the only biologic therapy for spinal pathologies that enhances the action of endogenous IL-1Ra reserves to improve symptoms. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of ACS in treating pain and disability caused by spinal pathologies.

Aim: To evaluate the use of ACS as a conservative management option for spinal pathology.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed/Medline was performed to identify studies investigating administration of ACS for treatment of any spinal pathology.

Results: Six articles were included, comprising 684 patients treated with epidural (n = 133) or transforaminal (n = 551) ACS injections. Patients had an average age of 54.0 years with slight female predominance (53.2%). The lumbar spine was most commonly treated, with 567 patients (82.9%) receiving injections for lumbar radiculopathy (n = 67), degenerative disc disease (DDD) (n = 372), or spinal stenosis (n = 128); cervical injections were performed in 109 patients (15.9%). Mean (SD) follow-up was 21.7 (4.8) weeks from first ACS injection. All studies investigating mechanical lumbar and lumbar or cervical radicular pain reported significant pain reduction at final follow-up compared to baseline. ACS achieved comparable or superior results to lumbar epidural steroid injections. Adverse events were reported in 21 patients (3.1%), with no serious adverse events.

Conclusion: ACS injection is a safe and effective intervention for pain reduction in many spinal pathologies, including cervical and lumbar radiculopathies.

使用自体调节血清对脊柱病变进行保守治疗:文献系统综述。
背景:慢性炎症性疼痛与白细胞介素(IL)-1(一种炎症细胞因子)的表达及其受体(IL-1R)的活性增加有关。对此,机体会产生 IL-1R 拮抗剂(IL-1Ra)来减少这种信号传导。自体调节血清(ACS)是治疗脊柱病变的唯一生物疗法,它能增强内源性 IL-1Ra 储备的作用,从而改善症状。本系统综述调查了 ACS 在治疗脊柱病变引起的疼痛和残疾方面的有效性。目的:评估 ACS 作为脊柱病变保守治疗方案的使用情况:方法:对PubMed/Medline进行系统回顾,以确定有关使用ACS治疗任何脊柱病变的研究:结果:共收录了6篇文章,其中包括684名接受硬膜外(n = 133)或经椎管(n = 551)ACS注射治疗的患者。患者平均年龄为 54.0 岁,女性略占多数(53.2%)。腰椎是最常见的治疗部位,567 名患者(82.9%)接受了腰椎病(67 人)、椎间盘退行性病变(372 人)或椎管狭窄(128 人)注射;109 名患者(15.9%)接受了颈椎注射。自首次注射 ACS 起,平均(标清)随访 21.7 (4.8) 周。所有对机械性腰痛和腰椎或颈椎根性疼痛进行调查的研究均报告称,与基线相比,最终随访时疼痛明显减轻。ACS 取得了与腰部硬膜外类固醇注射相当或更好的效果。有21名患者(3.1%)报告了不良事件,其中没有严重不良事件:ACS注射是一种安全有效的干预措施,可减轻包括颈椎和腰椎病在内的多种脊柱病变的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信