National Initiative Pivots Amid a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned From the InSideOut Initiative.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jeffrey J Milroy, Ann Kearns Davoren, Stephen Hebard, Pauline Grist, Samantha Kelly, GracieLee Weaver, David L Wyrick
{"title":"National Initiative Pivots Amid a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned From the InSideOut Initiative.","authors":"Jeffrey J Milroy, Ann Kearns Davoren, Stephen Hebard, Pauline Grist, Samantha Kelly, GracieLee Weaver, David L Wyrick","doi":"10.1177/15248399241285058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) caused disruptions and challenges across the globe, and many public health interventions focused on addressing immediate and emergent needs directly related to COVID-19. At the same time, other community health needs persisted, and intervention collaborators faced new challenges with reaching their communities. One such intervention was the InSideOut Initiative, a systems approach aimed at creating more supportive cultures for school-aged athletes by assisting school leaders, athletics administrators, and coaches with developing social and emotional competencies. Formerly, an initiative dependent on in-person trainings, as a result of COVID-19, InSideOut needed to pivot their approach. InSideOut executives and intervention collaborators were interviewed to better understand what adaptations were made and what lessons were learned to continue their mission. Findings point to three primary themes: prioritizing the community, implementation innovations, and being open to content additions and adaptations. Future public health interventions could benefit from incorporating community assessment, remaining open to social innovation, actively looking for new solutions, and integrating formative, process, and outcome evaluation processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241285058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241285058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) caused disruptions and challenges across the globe, and many public health interventions focused on addressing immediate and emergent needs directly related to COVID-19. At the same time, other community health needs persisted, and intervention collaborators faced new challenges with reaching their communities. One such intervention was the InSideOut Initiative, a systems approach aimed at creating more supportive cultures for school-aged athletes by assisting school leaders, athletics administrators, and coaches with developing social and emotional competencies. Formerly, an initiative dependent on in-person trainings, as a result of COVID-19, InSideOut needed to pivot their approach. InSideOut executives and intervention collaborators were interviewed to better understand what adaptations were made and what lessons were learned to continue their mission. Findings point to three primary themes: prioritizing the community, implementation innovations, and being open to content additions and adaptations. Future public health interventions could benefit from incorporating community assessment, remaining open to social innovation, actively looking for new solutions, and integrating formative, process, and outcome evaluation processes.

全球大流行中的国家行动支点:从 "InSideOut "计划中汲取的经验教训。
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) 在全球范围内造成了混乱和挑战,许多公共卫生干预措施都集中在解决与 COVID-19 直接相关的紧迫需求上。与此同时,其他社区的健康需求依然存在,干预合作者在深入社区方面面临着新的挑战。其中一项干预措施是 "InSideOut 倡议",这是一种系统方法,旨在通过协助学校领导、体育管理人员和教练培养社交和情感能力,为学龄运动员创造更具支持性的文化。以前,InSideOut 计划依赖于面对面的培训,但由于 COVID-19 的影响,InSideOut 需要调整他们的方法。我们对 InSideOut 的高管和干预合作者进行了访谈,以更好地了解他们做出了哪些调整,吸取了哪些经验教训,以继续完成他们的使命。调查结果显示了三个主要的主题:优先考虑社区、实施创新以及对内容添加和改编持开放态度。未来的公共卫生干预措施可以从纳入社区评估、对社会创新保持开放、积极寻找新的解决方案以及整合形成性评估、过程评估和结果评估过程中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信