"We're Checking a Box and, You Know, Covering Our Own": Health Professionals' Descriptions of Hospital-Policy Making Regarding Child Welfare Reporting Related to Birthing People's Drug Use.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1177/29767342241273416
Karen Alexander, Mishka Terplan, Sarah C M Roberts
{"title":"\"We're Checking a Box and, You Know, Covering Our Own\": Health Professionals' Descriptions of Hospital-Policy Making Regarding Child Welfare Reporting Related to Birthing People's Drug Use.","authors":"Karen Alexander, Mishka Terplan, Sarah C M Roberts","doi":"10.1177/29767342241273416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital policies play a role in healthcare providers' decision-making about reporting birthing people who use drugs to child welfare. This study sought to understand how these specific hospital policies are made.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals involved in developing or revising hospital policies related to child welfare reporting for birthing people who use drugs. The interview guide was informed by an implementation science framework and focused on participants' experiences developing or revising these policies. We coded transcripts inductively, focusing on themes that emerged in the interviews themselves, and deductively, focusing on pre-determined aspects of the policy development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 16) were physicians (69%), registered nurses (19%), and social workers (12%). The sample was drawn from all regions of the United States. Two themes emerged in data analysis. The first theme was that urine drug testing policies for pregnant and birthing individuals are seen as part of hospital child welfare reporting policies. Specifically, participants often described child welfare reporting policies as including criteria for urine drug testing and explained that the connection between urine drug testing and child welfare reporting policies was by design. The second theme was that the content of hospital child welfare reporting policies is a result of hospital politics and a focus on legal compliance. They described the legal compliance aspects of the hospital policies as serving to protect the institution and, occasionally, individual employees from legal consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The content of hospital policies regarding birthing people who use drugs appears influenced by political and legal considerations more than considerations of patient or public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241273416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital policies play a role in healthcare providers' decision-making about reporting birthing people who use drugs to child welfare. This study sought to understand how these specific hospital policies are made.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals involved in developing or revising hospital policies related to child welfare reporting for birthing people who use drugs. The interview guide was informed by an implementation science framework and focused on participants' experiences developing or revising these policies. We coded transcripts inductively, focusing on themes that emerged in the interviews themselves, and deductively, focusing on pre-determined aspects of the policy development process.

Results: Participants (N = 16) were physicians (69%), registered nurses (19%), and social workers (12%). The sample was drawn from all regions of the United States. Two themes emerged in data analysis. The first theme was that urine drug testing policies for pregnant and birthing individuals are seen as part of hospital child welfare reporting policies. Specifically, participants often described child welfare reporting policies as including criteria for urine drug testing and explained that the connection between urine drug testing and child welfare reporting policies was by design. The second theme was that the content of hospital child welfare reporting policies is a result of hospital politics and a focus on legal compliance. They described the legal compliance aspects of the hospital policies as serving to protect the institution and, occasionally, individual employees from legal consequences.

Conclusion: The content of hospital policies regarding birthing people who use drugs appears influenced by political and legal considerations more than considerations of patient or public health.

"我们在检查一个箱子,你知道,也是在保护我们自己":医护人员对医院制定与分娩者吸毒有关的儿童福利报告政策的描述》(Health Professionals' Descriptions of Hospital-Policy Making Regarding Child Welfare Reporting Related to Birthing People's Drug Use)。
背景:医院政策在医疗服务提供者决定是否向儿童福利机构报告分娩时吸毒者的情况中起着一定的作用。本研究试图了解这些具体的医院政策是如何制定的:我们对参与制定或修订医院政策的医护人员进行了半结构化访谈,这些政策与向儿童福利机构报告吸毒的分娩者有关。访谈指南以实施科学框架为基础,重点关注参与者制定或修订这些政策的经验。我们对访谈记录进行了归纳和演绎编码,归纳的重点是访谈中出现的主题,演绎的重点是政策制定过程中预先确定的方面:参与者(N = 16)包括医生(69%)、注册护士(19%)和社会工作者(12%)。样本来自美国各个地区。数据分析中出现了两个主题。第一个主题是,针对孕妇和产妇的尿液药物检测政策被视为医院儿童福利报告政策的一部分。具体来说,参与者经常描述儿童福利报告政策包括尿液药物检测的标准,并解释说尿液药物检测和儿童福利报告政策之间的联系是设计好的。第二个主题是,医院儿童福利报告政策的内容是医院政治和关注法律合规性的结果。他们将医院政策的法律合规性描述为保护机构,偶尔也保护员工个人免受法律后果的影响:结论:医院关于吸毒者分娩的政策内容似乎受到政治和法律因素的影响,而不是病人或公众健康方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信