Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Piyush Javiya, Kandra Rajakumari, Sravya Gorrepati, Donka Srilakshmi, Manawar Ahmad Mansoor, Hina Naim Abdul, Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig
{"title":"Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research.","authors":"Piyush Javiya, Kandra Rajakumari, Sravya Gorrepati, Donka Srilakshmi, Manawar Ahmad Mansoor, Hina Naim Abdul, Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_399_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this research was to compare the longstanding stability of single-piece implant systems to typical two-piece systems by analyzing patient records retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective examination of patient records from January 2010 to December 2020 was undertaken at the Department of Oral Implantology, University Hospital. The research included dental rehabilitation patients who got single- or two-piece implant systems. Patient demographics, implant features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results were extracted. Implant success rates, stability defined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) utilizing Osstell ISQ®, and peri-implant bone loss evaluated by standardized periapical radiographs at baseline and follow-up visits were the main outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research involved 320 patients (160 per cohort). The average patient age was 52.7 years, with 55% men. The mandibular region received 65% of implants, and the maxillary region the rest. Single-piece cohort A had 94.6% implant success, and two-piece cohort B 96.2%. Implant success rates were similar between cohorts (<i>P</i> = 0.412). The mean ISQ scores were 72.4 ± 4.8 in cohort A and 74.8 ± 5.1 in cohort B (<i>P</i> = 0.086). Peri-implant bone loss was 1.8 ± 0.7 mm in cohort A and 1.4 ± 0.6 mm in cohort B (<i>P</i> = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-piece implant systems provide a stable and successful alternative to classic two-piece systems. However, patient selection, surgical technique, and monitoring are essential to reduce peri-implant problems and improve clinical results. To improve implant dentistry patient care and evidence-based clinical practice, single-piece and two-piece implant systems' design, biomechanical features, and longstanding performance should be studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2649-S2651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_399_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this research was to compare the longstanding stability of single-piece implant systems to typical two-piece systems by analyzing patient records retrospectively.

Methods: A retrospective examination of patient records from January 2010 to December 2020 was undertaken at the Department of Oral Implantology, University Hospital. The research included dental rehabilitation patients who got single- or two-piece implant systems. Patient demographics, implant features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results were extracted. Implant success rates, stability defined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) utilizing Osstell ISQ®, and peri-implant bone loss evaluated by standardized periapical radiographs at baseline and follow-up visits were the main outcomes.

Results: The research involved 320 patients (160 per cohort). The average patient age was 52.7 years, with 55% men. The mandibular region received 65% of implants, and the maxillary region the rest. Single-piece cohort A had 94.6% implant success, and two-piece cohort B 96.2%. Implant success rates were similar between cohorts (P = 0.412). The mean ISQ scores were 72.4 ± 4.8 in cohort A and 74.8 ± 5.1 in cohort B (P = 0.086). Peri-implant bone loss was 1.8 ± 0.7 mm in cohort A and 1.4 ± 0.6 mm in cohort B (P = 0.031).

Conclusion: Single-piece implant systems provide a stable and successful alternative to classic two-piece systems. However, patient selection, surgical technique, and monitoring are essential to reduce peri-implant problems and improve clinical results. To improve implant dentistry patient care and evidence-based clinical practice, single-piece and two-piece implant systems' design, biomechanical features, and longstanding performance should be studied.

单片种植系统及其长期稳定性:评估研究。
研究目的本研究旨在通过回顾性分析患者记录,比较单件式种植体系统与典型的两件式种植体系统的长期稳定性:方法:对大学医院口腔种植科 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月的患者记录进行回顾性检查。研究对象包括使用单件式或两件式种植系统的牙科康复患者。研究提取了患者的人口统计学特征、种植体特征、手术过程和随访结果。研究的主要结果包括种植体成功率、利用 Osstell ISQ® 进行共振频率分析(RFA)确定的稳定性,以及基线和随访时通过标准化根尖周X光片评估的种植体周围骨质流失情况:研究涉及 320 名患者(每组 160 人)。患者平均年龄为 52.7 岁,55% 为男性。下颌区域接受了 65% 的种植体,其余为上颌区域。单件式 A 组群的种植成功率为 94.6%,双件式 B 组群的种植成功率为 96.2%。不同组群的种植成功率相似(P = 0.412)。A 组的平均 ISQ 评分为 72.4 ± 4.8,B 组为 74.8 ± 5.1(P = 0.086)。A 组种植体周围骨质流失为 1.8 ± 0.7 mm,B 组为 1.4 ± 0.6 mm(P = 0.031):结论:与传统的两件式种植体系统相比,单件式种植体系统是一种稳定、成功的替代方案。然而,患者选择、手术技术和监测对于减少种植体周围问题和改善临床效果至关重要。为了改善种植牙患者护理和循证临床实践,应该对单件式和两件式种植体系统的设计、生物力学特征和长期性能进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信