Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Two Different Drill Designs on Insertion Torque and Primary Stability during Osteotomy - An In Vivo Animal Study.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_221_24
Sudhakar Arpudaswamy, S Syed Asaraf Ali, Suma Karthigeyan, A Ponnanna, Yamini Nadhini, R Eazhil
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Two Different Drill Designs on Insertion Torque and Primary Stability during Osteotomy - An <i>In Vivo</i> Animal Study.","authors":"Sudhakar Arpudaswamy, S Syed Asaraf Ali, Suma Karthigeyan, A Ponnanna, Yamini Nadhini, R Eazhil","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_221_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effects of two drill designs on insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) during osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This <i>in vivo</i> animal study involved eight female New Zealand white rabbits divided into two groups: Group A underwent osteotomy using standard drills from the Zimmer surgical kit, and Group B used Densah drills. IT values and ISQ were taken during and after implant placement. Rabbits received premedication, and postoperative care was provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in peak IT were observed between the two groups, with Group B demonstrating a statistically significant advantage. However, no significant differences were found in ISQ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential benefits of osseodensification in enhancing primary stability during osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2288-S2290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_221_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effects of two drill designs on insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) during osteotomy.

Methodology: This in vivo animal study involved eight female New Zealand white rabbits divided into two groups: Group A underwent osteotomy using standard drills from the Zimmer surgical kit, and Group B used Densah drills. IT values and ISQ were taken during and after implant placement. Rabbits received premedication, and postoperative care was provided.

Results: Significant differences in peak IT were observed between the two groups, with Group B demonstrating a statistically significant advantage. However, no significant differences were found in ISQ between the groups.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential benefits of osseodensification in enhancing primary stability during osteotomy.

两种不同钻头设计对截骨术中插入扭矩和主稳定性影响的比较分析--一项体内动物研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估两种钻头设计对截骨过程中插入扭矩(IT)和种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的影响:本研究旨在评估两种钻头设计对截骨过程中插入扭矩(IT)和植入稳定性商数(ISQ)的影响:这项体内动物研究将八只雌性新西兰白兔分为两组:A 组使用 Zimmer 手术套件中的标准钻头进行截骨术,B 组使用 Densah 钻头。在植入过程中和植入后测量 IT 值和 ISQ。兔子接受了术前用药和术后护理:结果:两组之间的 IT 峰值存在显著差异,B 组在统计学上具有明显优势。然而,两组之间的 ISQ 没有明显差异:结论:本研究强调了骨增生在增强截骨术初期稳定性方面的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信