A Randomized, Split-Face, Comparative Study of a Combined Needle Radiofrequency/Intense Pulsed Light Device in Moderate-to-Severe Acne Patients.

Ki Yeon Kim, Seon Young Song, You Jin Jung, Mihn Sook Jue, Ji Yeon Hong, Beom Joon Kim, Joo Yeon Ko
{"title":"A Randomized, Split-Face, Comparative Study of a Combined Needle Radiofrequency/Intense Pulsed Light Device in Moderate-to-Severe Acne Patients.","authors":"Ki Yeon Kim, Seon Young Song, You Jin Jung, Mihn Sook Jue, Ji Yeon Hong, Beom Joon Kim, Joo Yeon Ko","doi":"10.5021/ad.23.083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency (RF) and intense pulsed light (IPL) have been reported as efficient adjuvant treatment modalities for acne vulgaris.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a combined needle RF and vacuum IPL device for acne treatment without the use of other conventional topical or oral agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, split-faced study was designed to include patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Comedone extraction was performed on both parts of the face prior to laser treatment. One side of the face was treated with RF and IPL in 2-week intervals, while the other side was left untreated as a control. Two independent blinded investigators evaluated the patients for improvement using clinical photographs. We also assessed for possible adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 44 patients with acne vulgaris (27 men and 17 women). Their ages ranged from 19-39 years (average, 23 years). At the final 12-week follow-up visit, the acne reduction rate was 34.80% (±33.45%; range, 30.92%-19.03%) on the treated side and 13.76% (±37.58%; range, 28.26%-23.27%) in the control group compared to baseline, constituting a significant difference. The difference in reduction rate between the treated and control sides was 21.03% (±25.09%), with the treated side experiencing more significant improvement (<i>p</i><0.05). In the assessment of adverse events, one patient experienced mild surrounding erythema that spontaneously improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined treatment of needle RF and IPL could improve acne lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94298,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dermatology","volume":"36 5","pages":"266-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.23.083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) and intense pulsed light (IPL) have been reported as efficient adjuvant treatment modalities for acne vulgaris.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a combined needle RF and vacuum IPL device for acne treatment without the use of other conventional topical or oral agents.

Methods: This randomized, split-faced study was designed to include patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Comedone extraction was performed on both parts of the face prior to laser treatment. One side of the face was treated with RF and IPL in 2-week intervals, while the other side was left untreated as a control. Two independent blinded investigators evaluated the patients for improvement using clinical photographs. We also assessed for possible adverse effects.

Results: The study included 44 patients with acne vulgaris (27 men and 17 women). Their ages ranged from 19-39 years (average, 23 years). At the final 12-week follow-up visit, the acne reduction rate was 34.80% (±33.45%; range, 30.92%-19.03%) on the treated side and 13.76% (±37.58%; range, 28.26%-23.27%) in the control group compared to baseline, constituting a significant difference. The difference in reduction rate between the treated and control sides was 21.03% (±25.09%), with the treated side experiencing more significant improvement (p<0.05). In the assessment of adverse events, one patient experienced mild surrounding erythema that spontaneously improved.

Conclusion: Combined treatment of needle RF and IPL could improve acne lesions.

针对中度至重度痤疮患者的针式射频/强脉冲光联合设备随机、分面比较研究。
背景:据报道,射频(RF)和强脉冲光(IPL)是治疗寻常型痤疮的有效辅助治疗方法:我们试图评估针式射频和真空强脉冲光联合设备在不使用其他常规外用或口服药物的情况下治疗痤疮的临床疗效和安全性:这项随机分面研究的对象是中度至重度寻常型痤疮患者。在激光治疗前,先在面部两侧进行粉刺去除。一侧脸部每两周接受一次射频和强脉冲光治疗,另一侧脸部不接受治疗作为对照。两名独立的盲人调查员通过临床照片对患者的改善情况进行评估。我们还评估了可能出现的不良反应:研究包括 44 名寻常型痤疮患者(27 名男性和 17 名女性)。他们的年龄在 19-39 岁之间(平均 23 岁)。在最后12周的随访中,与基线相比,治疗组的痤疮减少率为34.80%(±33.45%;范围为30.92%-19.03%),对照组为13.76%(±37.58%;范围为28.26%-23.27%),差异显著。治疗侧和对照组的减少率差异为 21.03% (±25.09%),治疗侧的改善更为显著(p 结论:针头射频和 IPL 联合治疗的效果非常明显:针式射频和强脉冲光联合治疗可改善痤疮皮损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信