Dynamic Contrast Ultrasound Diagnostics (CEUS) of Liver Lesions and Post-treatment Control with A New High-resolution Examination Technique (HiFR) and Perfusion.

Ernst Michael Jung, Lukas Pleyer, Ivor Dropco, Ulrich Kaiser, Dong Yi, Christian Stroszczynski, Friedrich Jung
{"title":"Dynamic Contrast Ultrasound Diagnostics (CEUS) of Liver Lesions and Post-treatment Control with A New High-resolution Examination Technique (HiFR) and Perfusion.","authors":"Ernst Michael Jung, Lukas Pleyer, Ivor Dropco, Ulrich Kaiser, Dong Yi, Christian Stroszczynski, Friedrich Jung","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>To evaluate, if high frame rate (HiFR) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and external perfusion analysis (VueBox®)can give answers on liver tumour diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multifrequency probe (C1-6 /Resona R9) and 1-2.4 ml ultrasound contrast medium were used for CEUS up to 5-6 min. Independent analysis of DICOM-CINE files was performed, correlated to follow-up, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 110 patients the difference between marginal peak enhancement (PE) of malignant and benign leasions was significant. In the peripheral area, the AUCs were lower in malignant lesions (144.8±139.3) than in benign lesions (123.6±119.8). The mean transit time (mTT) was shorter in malignant lesions in the center. In the liver parenchyma, however, the mTT was significantly longer in malignant lesions (141.6±107.9s) than in benign lesions (128.8±138.6 s). The rise time (RT) was significantly shorter central (66.5±30.9s) and peripheral (72.8±35.1s) in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (114.33±159.58s). The wash in rate (WiR) in benign lesions was 848.3±2,563.7 rU in the center. Wash-out rate (WoR) in the center, peripheral and in the liver parenchyma showed a significantly lower wash-out in the malignant lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HiFR CEUS with perfusion analysis enables the assessment of focal, diffuse and post-interventional liver changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"33 3","pages":"362-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: To evaluate, if high frame rate (HiFR) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and external perfusion analysis (VueBox®)can give answers on liver tumour diagnostics.

Methods: A multifrequency probe (C1-6 /Resona R9) and 1-2.4 ml ultrasound contrast medium were used for CEUS up to 5-6 min. Independent analysis of DICOM-CINE files was performed, correlated to follow-up, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or histopathology.

Results: In 110 patients the difference between marginal peak enhancement (PE) of malignant and benign leasions was significant. In the peripheral area, the AUCs were lower in malignant lesions (144.8±139.3) than in benign lesions (123.6±119.8). The mean transit time (mTT) was shorter in malignant lesions in the center. In the liver parenchyma, however, the mTT was significantly longer in malignant lesions (141.6±107.9s) than in benign lesions (128.8±138.6 s). The rise time (RT) was significantly shorter central (66.5±30.9s) and peripheral (72.8±35.1s) in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (114.33±159.58s). The wash in rate (WiR) in benign lesions was 848.3±2,563.7 rU in the center. Wash-out rate (WoR) in the center, peripheral and in the liver parenchyma showed a significantly lower wash-out in the malignant lesions.

Conclusions: HiFR CEUS with perfusion analysis enables the assessment of focal, diffuse and post-interventional liver changes.

利用新型高分辨率检查技术(HiFR)和灌注对肝脏病变进行动态对比超声诊断(CEUS)和治疗后控制。
背景与目的评估高帧率(HiFR)对比增强超声波(CEUS)和外部灌注分析(VueBox®)能否为肝脏肿瘤诊断提供答案:方法:使用多频探头(C1-6 /Resona R9)和 1-2.4 毫升超声造影剂进行长达 5-6 分钟的 CEUS。对 DICOM-CINE 文件进行独立分析,并与随访、计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像或组织病理学相关联:在 110 例患者中,恶性和良性浸润的边缘峰值增强(PE)差异显著。在周边区域,恶性病变的 AUC(144.8±139.3)低于良性病变(123.6±119.8)。恶性病变中心的平均转运时间(mTT)较短。但在肝实质中,恶性病变的 mTT(141.6±107.9 秒)明显长于良性病变(128.8±138.6 秒)。恶性病变的上升时间(RT)中央(66.5±30.9s)和外周(72.8±35.1s)明显短于良性病变(114.33±159.58s)。良性病变的中心洗入率(WiR)为 848.3±2 563.7 rU。中心、外周和肝实质的洗出率(WoR)显示,恶性病变的洗出率明显较低:结论:带灌注分析的高频CEUS可评估局灶性、弥漫性和介入后肝脏病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信