Stakeholder perceptions of factors contributing to effective implementation of exercise cardiac telerehabilitation in clinical practice.

Jonathan C Rawstorn, Narayan Subedi, Harriet Koorts, Luke Evans, Susie Cartledge, Matthew P Wallen, Fergal M Grace, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam, Ralph Maddison
{"title":"Stakeholder perceptions of factors contributing to effective implementation of exercise cardiac telerehabilitation in clinical practice.","authors":"Jonathan C Rawstorn, Narayan Subedi, Harriet Koorts, Luke Evans, Susie Cartledge, Matthew P Wallen, Fergal M Grace, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam, Ralph Maddison","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvae127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiac exercise telerehabilitation is effective and can be cost-effective for managing ischaemic heart disease, but implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice remains a challenge. We aimed to identify factors that cardiac rehabilitation stakeholders perceived could influence the effectiveness of implementing an evidence-based, real-time remotely monitored cardiac exercise telerehabilitation intervention (REMOTE-CR).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Online interviews and focus groups were conducted with cardiac rehabilitation consumers (n = 16, 5 female, 61.1 ± 10.0 years), practitioners (n = 20, 14 female; 36.6 ± 11.8 years), and health service managers (n = 11, 7 female; 46.2 ± 9.2 years) recruited from one metropolitan and three inner-regional healthcare services in Western Victoria, Australia. Discussions were guided by two theoretical frameworks (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research), and analysed thematically. Factors perceived to influence effective implementation of REMOTE-CR spanned all domains of the theoretical frameworks, related to six major themes (resources, change management, stakeholder targeting, knowledge, intervention design, security) and were largely consistent across study sites; however, the relative importance of each factor may vary between sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective implementation of exercise telerehabilitation interventions like REMOTE-CR will require a coordinated context-specific approach that considers factors across all levels of the healthcare system and implementation science frameworks. Key requirements include prioritizing resources, managing change, selecting target stakeholders, developing digital health capabilities, and selecting fit-for-purpose technologies that enable programme delivery objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":"116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac exercise telerehabilitation is effective and can be cost-effective for managing ischaemic heart disease, but implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice remains a challenge. We aimed to identify factors that cardiac rehabilitation stakeholders perceived could influence the effectiveness of implementing an evidence-based, real-time remotely monitored cardiac exercise telerehabilitation intervention (REMOTE-CR).

Methods and results: Online interviews and focus groups were conducted with cardiac rehabilitation consumers (n = 16, 5 female, 61.1 ± 10.0 years), practitioners (n = 20, 14 female; 36.6 ± 11.8 years), and health service managers (n = 11, 7 female; 46.2 ± 9.2 years) recruited from one metropolitan and three inner-regional healthcare services in Western Victoria, Australia. Discussions were guided by two theoretical frameworks (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research), and analysed thematically. Factors perceived to influence effective implementation of REMOTE-CR spanned all domains of the theoretical frameworks, related to six major themes (resources, change management, stakeholder targeting, knowledge, intervention design, security) and were largely consistent across study sites; however, the relative importance of each factor may vary between sites.

Conclusion: Effective implementation of exercise telerehabilitation interventions like REMOTE-CR will require a coordinated context-specific approach that considers factors across all levels of the healthcare system and implementation science frameworks. Key requirements include prioritizing resources, managing change, selecting target stakeholders, developing digital health capabilities, and selecting fit-for-purpose technologies that enable programme delivery objectives.

利益相关者对有助于在临床实践中有效实施运动性心脏远程康复的因素的看法。
目的:心脏运动远程康复对缺血性心脏病的治疗是有效的,而且具有成本效益,但在临床实践中实施循证干预仍是一项挑战。我们旨在确定心脏康复相关人员认为哪些因素会影响循证、实时远程监控心脏运动远程康复干预(REMOTE-CR)的实施效果:对来自澳大利亚维多利亚州西部一个大都市和三个内陆地区医疗保健服务机构的心脏康复消费者(16 人,5 名女性;61.1 ± 10.0 岁)、从业人员(20 人,14 名女性;36.6 ± 11.8 岁)和医疗服务管理人员(11 人,7 名女性;46.2 ± 9.2 岁)进行了在线访谈和焦点小组讨论。讨论以两个理论框架(不采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播和可持续性;实施研究综合框架)为指导,并按主题进行分析。被认为影响远程康复中心有效实施的因素横跨理论框架的所有领域,涉及六大主题(资源、变革管理、利益相关者定位、知识、干预设计、安全),并且在不同研究地点基本一致;但是,每个因素的相对重要性在不同地点可能有所不同:结论:有效实施像 REMOTE-CR 这样的运动远程康复干预措施,需要采取针对具体情况的协调方法,考虑医疗保健系统各个层面的因素和实施科学框架。关键要求包括确定资源的优先级、管理变革、选择目标利益相关者、发展数字医疗能力以及选择能够实现计划交付目标的适用技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信