Fondaparinux versus Enoxaparin in the Treatment of Obese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36660/abc.20230793
Beatriz Rocha Darzé, Carolina Costa da Silva Souza, Queila Borges de Oliveira, João Victor Santos Pereira Ramos, Mateus S Viana, Eduardo Sahade Darzé, Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt
{"title":"Fondaparinux versus Enoxaparin in the Treatment of Obese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Beatriz Rocha Darzé, Carolina Costa da Silva Souza, Queila Borges de Oliveira, João Victor Santos Pereira Ramos, Mateus S Viana, Eduardo Sahade Darzé, Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt","doi":"10.36660/abc.20230793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fondaparinux is an effective and safe anticoagulant in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, due to the low representation of obese individuals in clinical trials, the effects of applying the results of this drug to this population remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare Fondaparinux to Enoxaparin in the treatment of obese patients with ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study, including obese individuals (BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m2) admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA) and treated with Fondaparinux or Enoxaparin between 2010 and 2020. The Fondaparinux and Enoxaparin groups were compared for their clinical and laboratory characteristics using chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, as appropriate. The incidence of primary outcomes (death, reinfarction, stroke, major bleeding) was compared between groups. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 367 obese patients with NSTEMI or UA were included, of whom 258 used Fondaparinux and 109 used Enoxaparin. Mean age was 64 ± 12 years, and 52.9% were male. The prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior coronary artery disease, prior stroke, and implementation of invasive strategy was similar between groups. The incidence of the primary outcome was 4.7% in the Fondaparinux group and 5.5% in the Enoxaparin group (p = 0.729). There was no difference between groups when analyzing the components of the primary outcome separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a sample of obese patients with NSTEMI or UA, there was no difference in the occurrence of the composite outcome (death, stroke, reinfarction, major bleeding) between patients who used Fondaparinux or Enoxaparin.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"121 8","pages":"e20230793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fondaparinux is an effective and safe anticoagulant in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, due to the low representation of obese individuals in clinical trials, the effects of applying the results of this drug to this population remain uncertain.

Objectives: To compare Fondaparinux to Enoxaparin in the treatment of obese patients with ACS.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, including obese individuals (BMI ≥ 30 Kg/m2) admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA) and treated with Fondaparinux or Enoxaparin between 2010 and 2020. The Fondaparinux and Enoxaparin groups were compared for their clinical and laboratory characteristics using chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, as appropriate. The incidence of primary outcomes (death, reinfarction, stroke, major bleeding) was compared between groups. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.

Results: A total of 367 obese patients with NSTEMI or UA were included, of whom 258 used Fondaparinux and 109 used Enoxaparin. Mean age was 64 ± 12 years, and 52.9% were male. The prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior coronary artery disease, prior stroke, and implementation of invasive strategy was similar between groups. The incidence of the primary outcome was 4.7% in the Fondaparinux group and 5.5% in the Enoxaparin group (p = 0.729). There was no difference between groups when analyzing the components of the primary outcome separately.

Conclusion: In a sample of obese patients with NSTEMI or UA, there was no difference in the occurrence of the composite outcome (death, stroke, reinfarction, major bleeding) between patients who used Fondaparinux or Enoxaparin.

丰达肝癸与依诺肝素在急性冠状动脉综合征肥胖患者治疗中的对比。
背景:磺达肝癸是治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的一种有效而安全的抗凝剂。然而,由于肥胖者在临床试验中的比例较低,将这种药物的结果应用于肥胖者的效果仍不确定:方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括2010年至2020年间因非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或不稳定型心绞痛(UA)入院并接受磺达肝癸或依诺肝素治疗的肥胖患者(体重指数≥30 Kg/m2)。采用卡方检验(chi-square)和曼惠特尼检验(Mann-Whitney)对丰达肝癸和依诺肝素组的临床和实验室特征进行比较。比较了两组间主要结局(死亡、再梗死、中风、大出血)的发生率。所有分析均以 P 值小于 0.05 为显著:共纳入367名NSTEMI或UA肥胖患者,其中258人使用磺达肝癸,109人使用依诺肝素。平均年龄为 64 ± 12 岁,52.9% 为男性。两组患者的糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常、既往冠心病、既往中风和实施侵入性策略的发生率相似。方达肝素组的主要结果发生率为 4.7%,依诺肝素组为 5.5%(P = 0.729)。在分别分析主要结果的各个组成部分时,组间没有差异:结论:在NSTEMI或UA的肥胖患者样本中,使用磺达肝癸或依诺肝素的患者在综合结果(死亡、卒中、再梗死、大出血)的发生率上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信