Clinical practices related to liberation from mechanical ventilation in Latin American pediatric intensive care units: survey of the Sociedad Latino-Americana de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos Mechanical Ventilation Liberation Group.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240066-en
Alejandra Retta, Analía Fernández, Ezequiel Monteverde, Cintia Johnston, Andrés Castillo-Moya, Silvio Torres, Jesus Dominguez-Rojas, Matias G Herrera, Vlademir Aguilera-Avendaño, Yúrika López-Alarcón, Davi Pascual Rojas Flores, Manuel Eduardo Munaico-Abanto, Júlia Acuña, Rosa León, Carla Ferreira, Gabriela Sequeira, Cristina Camilo, Mauricio Yunge, Yolanda López Fernández
{"title":"Clinical practices related to liberation from mechanical ventilation in Latin American pediatric intensive care units: survey of the Sociedad Latino-Americana de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos Mechanical Ventilation Liberation Group.","authors":"Alejandra Retta, Analía Fernández, Ezequiel Monteverde, Cintia Johnston, Andrés Castillo-Moya, Silvio Torres, Jesus Dominguez-Rojas, Matias G Herrera, Vlademir Aguilera-Avendaño, Yúrika López-Alarcón, Davi Pascual Rojas Flores, Manuel Eduardo Munaico-Abanto, Júlia Acuña, Rosa León, Carla Ferreira, Gabriela Sequeira, Cristina Camilo, Mauricio Yunge, Yolanda López Fernández","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240066-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address the current practice of liberating patients from invasive mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units, with a focus on the use of standardized protocols, criteria, parameters, and indications for noninvasive respiratory support postextubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic research was carried out from November 2021 to May 2022 in Ibero-American pediatric intensive care units. Physicians and respiratory therapists participated, with a single representative for each pediatric intensive care unit included. There were no interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 48.9% (138/282), representing 10 Ibero-American countries. Written invasive mechanical ventilation liberation protocols were available in only 34.1% (47/138) of the pediatric intensive care units, and their use was associated with the presence of respiratory therapists (OR 3.85; 95%CI 1.79 - 8.33; p = 0.0008). The most common method of liberation involved a gradual reduction in ventilatory support plus a spontaneous breathing trial (47.1%). The mean spontaneous breathing trial duration was 60 - 120 minutes in 64.8% of the responses. The presence of a respiratory therapist in the pediatric intensive care unit was the only variable associated with the use of a spontaneous breathing trial as the primary method of liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 5.1; 95%CI 2.1 - 12.5). Noninvasive respiratory support protocols were not frequently used postextubation (40.4%). Nearly half of the respondents (43.5%) reported a preference for using bilevel positive airway pressure as the mode of noninvasive ventilation postextubation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high proportion of Ibero-American pediatric intensive care units lack liberation protocols. Our study highlights substantial variability in extubation readiness practices, underscoring the need for standardization in this process. However, the presence of a respiratory therapist was associated with increased adherence to guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240066en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240066-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To address the current practice of liberating patients from invasive mechanical ventilation in pediatric intensive care units, with a focus on the use of standardized protocols, criteria, parameters, and indications for noninvasive respiratory support postextubation.

Methods: Electronic research was carried out from November 2021 to May 2022 in Ibero-American pediatric intensive care units. Physicians and respiratory therapists participated, with a single representative for each pediatric intensive care unit included. There were no interventions.

Results: The response rate was 48.9% (138/282), representing 10 Ibero-American countries. Written invasive mechanical ventilation liberation protocols were available in only 34.1% (47/138) of the pediatric intensive care units, and their use was associated with the presence of respiratory therapists (OR 3.85; 95%CI 1.79 - 8.33; p = 0.0008). The most common method of liberation involved a gradual reduction in ventilatory support plus a spontaneous breathing trial (47.1%). The mean spontaneous breathing trial duration was 60 - 120 minutes in 64.8% of the responses. The presence of a respiratory therapist in the pediatric intensive care unit was the only variable associated with the use of a spontaneous breathing trial as the primary method of liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 5.1; 95%CI 2.1 - 12.5). Noninvasive respiratory support protocols were not frequently used postextubation (40.4%). Nearly half of the respondents (43.5%) reported a preference for using bilevel positive airway pressure as the mode of noninvasive ventilation postextubation.

Conclusion: A high proportion of Ibero-American pediatric intensive care units lack liberation protocols. Our study highlights substantial variability in extubation readiness practices, underscoring the need for standardization in this process. However, the presence of a respiratory therapist was associated with increased adherence to guidelines.

拉丁美洲儿科重症监护病房机械通气解放相关临床实践:拉丁美洲儿科重症监护协会机械通气解放小组调查。
目的探讨目前儿科重症监护病房将患者从有创机械通气中解放出来的做法,重点关注拔管后无创呼吸支持的标准化方案、标准、参数和适应症的使用:从 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 5 月,在伊比利亚-美洲儿科重症监护室开展了电子研究。医生和呼吸治疗师参与其中,每个儿科重症监护室都有一名代表。没有干预措施:响应率为 48.9%(138/282),代表了 10 个伊比利亚-美洲国家。只有 34.1%(47/138)的儿科重症监护病房有书面的有创机械通气解放方案,其使用与呼吸治疗师的存在有关(OR 3.85;95%CI 1.79 - 8.33;P = 0.0008)。最常见的解脱方法是逐渐减少通气支持并进行自主呼吸试验(47.1%)。64.8%的患者的平均自主呼吸试验时间为 60 - 120 分钟。儿科重症监护病房是否有呼吸治疗师是唯一一个与使用自主呼吸试验作为从有创机械通气中解脱出来的主要方法相关的变量(OR 5.1;95%CI 2.1 - 12.5)。无创呼吸支持方案在拔管后并不常用(40.4%)。近一半的受访者(43.5%)表示倾向于在拔管后使用双水平气道正压作为无创通气模式:结论:伊比利亚-美洲的儿科重症监护病房中有很大一部分缺乏拔管方案。我们的研究强调了拔管准备工作中存在的巨大差异,突出了这一过程标准化的必要性。不过,呼吸治疗师的存在与更严格遵守指南有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信