The impact of hospital-specific guidelines on carbapenem use and patient outcomes in a setting for high endemicity with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli.

Cemre Boşnak, Şeyda Betül Fındık, Muhammed Atay, Ward Fakhouri, Sada Babazade, Eda Karadoğan, Gökhan Metan, Ömrüm Uzun
{"title":"The impact of hospital-specific guidelines on carbapenem use and patient outcomes in a setting for high endemicity with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli.","authors":"Cemre Boşnak, Şeyda Betül Fındık, Muhammed Atay, Ward Fakhouri, Sada Babazade, Eda Karadoğan, Gökhan Metan, Ömrüm Uzun","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of hospital-specific guidelines on the optimal utilization of carbapenems and to examine their effects on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care hospital in Turkey where infectious diseases (IDs) consultation and antibiotic approval are mandatory for carbapenem use.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All inpatients ≥18 years of age who received a carbapenem for at least 24 hours during the study periods were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Hospital-specific treatment guidelines were introduced in April 2019. The control group was the year 2018, when there were no guidelines (pre-GP). The year 2020 was analyzed as the intervention period (post-GP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 678 patients were analyzed, 326 in the pre-GP period and 352 in the post-GP period. Following guideline implementation, there was a significant increase in appropriate carbapenem use (49.1% in pre-GP vs 71.9% in post-GP, <i>P</i> < .001). The duration of carbapenem use decreased significantly (<i>P</i> = .019). However, there was no significant change in the incidence of new infection episodes within the subsequent 30 days (27.6% in pre-GP vs 28.3% in post-GP), or in the length of hospitalization [median (25%-75%) = 28 (16-46) in pre-GP, 28 (15-47.5) in post-GP, <i>P</i> = .678]. Mortality rates were similar at day 7 post-GP (1.7%) compared to pre-GP (0.03%) (<i>P</i> = .125).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of guidelines increased the appropriate utilization of carbapenems, without resulting in extended hospital stays or recurrent episodes. Despite an increased number of patients admitted to the ICU during the latter period, infection-related mortality rates remained comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of hospital-specific guidelines on the optimal utilization of carbapenems and to examine their effects on patient outcomes.

Design: Quasi-experimental study.

Setting: Tertiary care hospital in Turkey where infectious diseases (IDs) consultation and antibiotic approval are mandatory for carbapenem use.

Participants: All inpatients ≥18 years of age who received a carbapenem for at least 24 hours during the study periods were enrolled.

Intervention: Hospital-specific treatment guidelines were introduced in April 2019. The control group was the year 2018, when there were no guidelines (pre-GP). The year 2020 was analyzed as the intervention period (post-GP).

Results: A total of 678 patients were analyzed, 326 in the pre-GP period and 352 in the post-GP period. Following guideline implementation, there was a significant increase in appropriate carbapenem use (49.1% in pre-GP vs 71.9% in post-GP, P < .001). The duration of carbapenem use decreased significantly (P = .019). However, there was no significant change in the incidence of new infection episodes within the subsequent 30 days (27.6% in pre-GP vs 28.3% in post-GP), or in the length of hospitalization [median (25%-75%) = 28 (16-46) in pre-GP, 28 (15-47.5) in post-GP, P = .678]. Mortality rates were similar at day 7 post-GP (1.7%) compared to pre-GP (0.03%) (P = .125).

Conclusions: The implementation of guidelines increased the appropriate utilization of carbapenems, without resulting in extended hospital stays or recurrent episodes. Despite an increased number of patients admitted to the ICU during the latter period, infection-related mortality rates remained comparable.

在耐多药革兰氏阴性杆菌高度流行的环境中,医院特定指南对碳青霉烯类药物使用和患者预后的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在评估医院特定指南对最佳使用碳青霉烯类药物的影响,并研究其对患者预后的影响:准实验研究:背景:土耳其的三级医院,该医院在使用碳青霉烯类时必须进行传染病(IDs)会诊和抗生素审批:所有在研究期间接受碳青霉烯类治疗至少 24 小时且年龄≥18 岁的住院患者均被纳入研究范围:医院特定治疗指南于2019年4月出台。对照组为没有指南的 2018 年(指南出台前)。2020年作为干预期(后指南)进行分析:结果:共分析了 678 名患者,其中 326 人在指南实施前,352 人在指南实施后。指南实施后,适当使用碳青霉烯类药物的比例显著增加(指南实施前为 49.1%,指南实施后为 71.9%,P < .001)。使用碳青霉烯类药物的时间明显缩短(P = .019)。然而,在随后的 30 天内,新感染病例的发生率(GP 前为 27.6% vs GP 后为 28.3%)和住院时间(GP 前的中位数(25%-75%)= 28 (16-46),GP 后的中位数为 28 (15-47.5),P = .678)均无明显变化。实施指南后第 7 天的死亡率(1.7%)与实施指南前(0.03%)相似(P = .125):结论:指南的实施提高了碳青霉烯类药物的合理使用率,但并未导致住院时间延长或病情反复。尽管后期入住重症监护室的患者人数有所增加,但与感染相关的死亡率仍然相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信