MRSA nasal screening predictive values assessment in patients with osteomyelitis.

Stefanie Stramel, Valerie Buckley, MaiCuc Tran, Todd Price
{"title":"MRSA nasal screening predictive values assessment in patients with osteomyelitis.","authors":"Stefanie Stramel, Valerie Buckley, MaiCuc Tran, Todd Price","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective and design: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) nasal screening utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in patients with osteomyelitis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A multisite, retrospective adult chart review from March 2021 to June 2022 was conducted, with no interventions performed. Patients treated with anti-MRSA therapy for osteomyelitis, MRSA nares PCR collected within 48 hours of antibiotic initiation, and related cultures were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with associated cultures were assessed for concordance with MRSA nares PCR screening results. The primary outcome was the diagnostic value of MRSA nares PCR assay screening for predicting MRSA osteomyelitis. An assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was performed. Key secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and duration of anti-MRSA therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred seven patients with MRSA nares PCR sensitivities were included in this assessment. The PPV and NPV were determined to be 25% CI (10.08-49.79%) and 94.7% CI (91.29-96.87%), respectively. Median and interquartile range durations of anti-MRSA therapy were decreased in the MRSA PCR negative group at 5 (3-8) versus 6.5 (6-9.75) days (<i>p</i> = 0.03752).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research showed a high NPV (94.7%) and a low PPV (25%) that aligned with other studies evaluating MRSA nares PCR utilization in osteomyelitis. Additionally, despite no active intervention on the results, early de-escalation of inappropriate antibiotic therapy was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective and design: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in patients with osteomyelitis.

Setting: A multisite, retrospective adult chart review from March 2021 to June 2022 was conducted, with no interventions performed. Patients treated with anti-MRSA therapy for osteomyelitis, MRSA nares PCR collected within 48 hours of antibiotic initiation, and related cultures were evaluated.

Patients: Adults with associated cultures were assessed for concordance with MRSA nares PCR screening results. The primary outcome was the diagnostic value of MRSA nares PCR assay screening for predicting MRSA osteomyelitis. An assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was performed. Key secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and duration of anti-MRSA therapy.

Results: One hundred seven patients with MRSA nares PCR sensitivities were included in this assessment. The PPV and NPV were determined to be 25% CI (10.08-49.79%) and 94.7% CI (91.29-96.87%), respectively. Median and interquartile range durations of anti-MRSA therapy were decreased in the MRSA PCR negative group at 5 (3-8) versus 6.5 (6-9.75) days (p = 0.03752).

Conclusion: This research showed a high NPV (94.7%) and a low PPV (25%) that aligned with other studies evaluating MRSA nares PCR utilization in osteomyelitis. Additionally, despite no active intervention on the results, early de-escalation of inappropriate antibiotic therapy was observed.

骨髓炎患者的 MRSA 鼻腔筛查预测值评估。
目的和设计:本研究旨在评估利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)测定对骨髓炎患者进行耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔筛查的诊断价值:对 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 6 月期间的成人病历进行了多站点回顾性分析,未采取任何干预措施。对接受骨髓炎抗 MRSA 治疗的患者、在开始使用抗生素 48 小时内采集的 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 以及相关培养结果进行了评估:评估了相关培养结果与 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 筛查结果的一致性。主要结果是 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 检测筛查对预测 MRSA 骨髓炎的诊断价值。对敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV) 进行了评估。主要次要结果包括住院时间和抗 MRSA 治疗时间:本次评估共纳入了 177 名 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 敏感性患者。PPV 和 NPV 分别为 25% CI(10.08%-49.79%)和 94.7% CI(91.29%-96.87%)。MRSA PCR 阴性组抗 MRSA 治疗的中位数和四分位数范围持续时间分别为 5 天(3-8 天)和 6.5 天(6-9.75 天)(P = 0.03752):该研究显示,与其他评估骨髓炎中 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 使用情况的研究相比,该研究的 NPV 高(94.7%),PPV 低(25%)。此外,尽管没有对结果进行积极干预,但仍观察到不适当抗生素治疗的早期降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信