Incorporating Microbial Stimuli for Osteogenesis in a Rabbit Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Model.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Nada Ristya Rahmani, Anneli Duits, Michiel Croes, Olivia Lock, Debby Gawlitta, Harrie Weinans, Moyo C Kruyt
{"title":"Incorporating Microbial Stimuli for Osteogenesis in a Rabbit Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Model.","authors":"Nada Ristya Rahmani, Anneli Duits, Michiel Croes, Olivia Lock, Debby Gawlitta, Harrie Weinans, Moyo C Kruyt","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autologous bone grafts are commonly used to repair defects in skeletal tissue, however, due to their limited supply there is a clinical need for alternatives. Synthetic ceramics present a promising option but currently lack biological activity to stimulate bone regeneration. One potential approach to address this limitation is the incorporation of immunomodulatory agents. In this study, we investigate the application of microbial stimuli to stimulate bone formation. Three different microbial stimuli were incorporated in a biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) ceramic: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), gamma-irradiated <i>Staphylococcus aureus (</i>γi-<i>S. aureus)</i>, or γi<i>-Candida albicans</i> (γi<i>-C. Albicans</i>). The constructs were then implanted in both a rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion (PLF) and an intramuscular implant model for 10 weeks and compared to a nonstimulated control construct. For the PLF model, the formation of a bony bridge was evaluated by manual palpation, micro computed tomography, and histology. While complete fusion was not observed, the BCG condition was most promising with higher manual stiffness and almost twice as much bone volume in the central fusion mass compared to the control (9 ± 4.4% bone area vs. 4.6 ± 2.3%, respectively). Conversely, the γi-<i>S. aureus</i> or <i>γi-C. albicans</i> appeared to inhibit bone formation (1.4 ± 1.4% and 1.2 ± 0.6% bone area). Bone induction was not observed in any of the intramuscular implants. This study indicates that incorporating immunomodulatory agents in ceramic bone substitutes can affect bone formation, which can be positive when selected carefully. The readily available and clinically approved BCG showed promising results, which warrants further research for clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56375,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering Part A","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2024.0064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autologous bone grafts are commonly used to repair defects in skeletal tissue, however, due to their limited supply there is a clinical need for alternatives. Synthetic ceramics present a promising option but currently lack biological activity to stimulate bone regeneration. One potential approach to address this limitation is the incorporation of immunomodulatory agents. In this study, we investigate the application of microbial stimuli to stimulate bone formation. Three different microbial stimuli were incorporated in a biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) ceramic: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), gamma-irradiated Staphylococcus aureus (γi-S. aureus), or γi-Candida albicans (γi-C. Albicans). The constructs were then implanted in both a rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion (PLF) and an intramuscular implant model for 10 weeks and compared to a nonstimulated control construct. For the PLF model, the formation of a bony bridge was evaluated by manual palpation, micro computed tomography, and histology. While complete fusion was not observed, the BCG condition was most promising with higher manual stiffness and almost twice as much bone volume in the central fusion mass compared to the control (9 ± 4.4% bone area vs. 4.6 ± 2.3%, respectively). Conversely, the γi-S. aureus or γi-C. albicans appeared to inhibit bone formation (1.4 ± 1.4% and 1.2 ± 0.6% bone area). Bone induction was not observed in any of the intramuscular implants. This study indicates that incorporating immunomodulatory agents in ceramic bone substitutes can affect bone formation, which can be positive when selected carefully. The readily available and clinically approved BCG showed promising results, which warrants further research for clinical translation.

在兔脊柱后外侧融合模型中结合微生物刺激促进骨质生成
自体骨移植通常用于修复骨骼组织的缺损,但由于其供应有限,临床上需要替代品。合成陶瓷是一种很有前景的选择,但目前缺乏刺激骨再生的生物活性。解决这一局限性的潜在方法之一是加入免疫调节剂。在这项研究中,我们探讨了应用微生物刺激物刺激骨形成的问题。我们在双相磷酸钙(BCP)陶瓷中加入了三种不同的微生物刺激物:卡介苗(BCG)、经伽马射线照射的金黄色葡萄球菌(γi-S. aureus)或白色念珠菌(γi-C. Albicans)。然后将构建物植入兔脊柱后外侧融合(PLF)模型和肌肉内植入模型中 10 周,并与未受刺激的对照构建物进行比较。在 PLF 模型中,通过人工触诊、显微 CT 和组织学检查来评估骨桥的形成情况。虽然没有观察到完全融合,但 BCG 条件最有希望,与对照组相比,其手动硬度更高,中心融合块的骨量几乎是对照组的两倍(分别为 9±4.4% 骨面积 vs 4.6±2.3%)。相反,γi-金黄色葡萄球菌或γi-白色念珠菌似乎会抑制骨形成(骨面积分别为 1.4±1.4% 和 1.2±0.6%)。肌肉内植入物均未观察到骨诱导作用。这项研究表明,在陶瓷骨替代物中加入免疫调节剂可能会影响骨形成,如果仔细选择,这种影响可能是积极的。现成的、已获临床批准的卡介苗显示出良好的效果,值得进一步研究以实现临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering Part A
Tissue Engineering Part A Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering is the preeminent, biomedical journal advancing the field with cutting-edge research and applications that repair or regenerate portions or whole tissues. This multidisciplinary journal brings together the principles of engineering and life sciences in the creation of artificial tissues and regenerative medicine. Tissue Engineering is divided into three parts, providing a central forum for groundbreaking scientific research and developments of clinical applications from leading experts in the field that will enable the functional replacement of tissues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信