Clinical Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Flexible Ureteroscopy as an Outpatient Procedure: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Life-Basel Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.3390/life14091131
George F Mitroi, Petru Octavian Drăgoescu, Mihaela Roxana Mitroi, George G Mitroi, Iulia Bianca Dudan, Tudor Cristian Timotei Popescu, Cristian Mihai Nedelcuță, Andrei Ioan Drocaș
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Flexible Ureteroscopy as an Outpatient Procedure: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.","authors":"George F Mitroi, Petru Octavian Drăgoescu, Mihaela Roxana Mitroi, George G Mitroi, Iulia Bianca Dudan, Tudor Cristian Timotei Popescu, Cristian Mihai Nedelcuță, Andrei Ioan Drocaș","doi":"10.3390/life14091131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nephrolithiasis, or kidney stone disease, is a significant global health issue in urology, requiring effective management strategies. The management of nephrolithiasis through flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is increasingly gaining acceptance; however, it is associated with significant costs related to consumables, pharmacotherapy, specialized equipment, and general anesthesia (GA). Limited resources and the need to optimize the cost effectiveness ratio have driven the shift to day-case procedures, offering financial and operational benefits and improving patient satisfaction. This outpatient care approach addresses clinical and economic challenges. For same-day discharge, spinal anesthesia (SA) is essential for fURS, as GA does not permit safe immediate discharge. This retrospective study investigates the feasibility of same-day discharge following fURS procedures performed under SA. Analyzing data from 401 patients who underwent 414 fURS procedures between January 2020 and December 2023, this study aims to evaluate whether same-day discharge is a viable option compared to conventional fURS under GA. The primary objectives are to assess the outcomes, including efficacy, stone-free rate (SFR), pain management, and complication rates, in the context of same-day discharge. Additionally, this study seeks to identify patient and kidney stone characteristics that may influence the suitability of one-day fURS under SA. Outcomes will be measured using the Dindo-Clavien (D-C) classification and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores post-procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11433351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nephrolithiasis, or kidney stone disease, is a significant global health issue in urology, requiring effective management strategies. The management of nephrolithiasis through flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is increasingly gaining acceptance; however, it is associated with significant costs related to consumables, pharmacotherapy, specialized equipment, and general anesthesia (GA). Limited resources and the need to optimize the cost effectiveness ratio have driven the shift to day-case procedures, offering financial and operational benefits and improving patient satisfaction. This outpatient care approach addresses clinical and economic challenges. For same-day discharge, spinal anesthesia (SA) is essential for fURS, as GA does not permit safe immediate discharge. This retrospective study investigates the feasibility of same-day discharge following fURS procedures performed under SA. Analyzing data from 401 patients who underwent 414 fURS procedures between January 2020 and December 2023, this study aims to evaluate whether same-day discharge is a viable option compared to conventional fURS under GA. The primary objectives are to assess the outcomes, including efficacy, stone-free rate (SFR), pain management, and complication rates, in the context of same-day discharge. Additionally, this study seeks to identify patient and kidney stone characteristics that may influence the suitability of one-day fURS under SA. Outcomes will be measured using the Dindo-Clavien (D-C) classification and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores post-procedure.

作为门诊手术的柔性输尿管镜检查的临床结果和安全性评估:单中心回顾性研究
肾结石或肾石症是泌尿外科领域一个重要的全球性健康问题,需要有效的管理策略。通过柔性输尿管镜(fURS)治疗肾结石的方法正逐渐被接受;然而,这种方法与耗材、药物治疗、专业设备和全身麻醉(GA)相关的成本也很高。有限的资源和优化成本效益比的需求推动了向日间手术的转变,从而带来了经济和运营上的好处,并提高了患者的满意度。这种门诊护理方法可应对临床和经济方面的挑战。要想当天出院,脊髓麻醉(SA)对急诊手术至关重要,因为GA不允许立即安全出院。这项回顾性研究探讨了在 SA 下进行 fURS 手术后当天出院的可行性。本研究分析了在 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受 414 次 fURS 手术的 401 名患者的数据,旨在评估与在 GA 下进行的传统 fURS 相比,当天出院是否是一种可行的选择。主要目的是评估当天出院的疗效、无结石率(SFR)、疼痛控制和并发症发生率等结果。此外,本研究还试图找出可能影响在 SA 下进行一日 fURS 的适宜性的患者和肾结石特征。研究结果将使用 Dindo-Clavien (D-C) 分类和术后视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分来衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信