Evaluation of masticatory muscles in patients with different sagittal direction skeletal anomalies by ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography.

IF 1.6 3区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s11282-024-00774-2

Cansu Tüfekçi, Esra Bolat Gümüş, Sevcihan Günen Yılmaz

{"title":"Evaluation of masticatory muscles in patients with different sagittal direction skeletal anomalies by ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography.","authors":"Cansu Tüfekçi, Esra Bolat Gümüş, Sevcihan Günen Yılmaz","doi":"10.1007/s11282-024-00774-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluated the masseter, anterior digastric and geniohyoid muscles of individuals with similar growth and developmental periods but different sagittal skeletal malocclusions using ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography and to make interclass assessments.Methods: In this study, ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography records of 30 Class I individuals (17 females, 13 males), 30 Class II individuals (14 females, 16 males), and 27 Class III individuals (12 females, 15 males) in the normodivergent and growth development period were used. The masseter, anterior digastric, and geniohyoid muscles of individuals were examined using ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography, and comparisons were made between the classes. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Mann Whitney U, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis H tests.Results: Interclass differences were found in ultrasonography and elastography measurements of the masseter muscle. However, no differences were observed in ultrasonography measurements of the auxiliary masticatory muscles, whereas differences were seen only in the geniohyoid muscle in elastography measurements among the classes (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Individuals with different sagittal skeletal malocclusions during growth and development exhibited similar muscle sizes and elasticities, approximately close to each other.","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-024-00774-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluated the masseter, anterior digastric and geniohyoid muscles of individuals with similar growth and developmental periods but different sagittal skeletal malocclusions using ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography and to make interclass assessments.

Methods: In this study, ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography records of 30 Class I individuals (17 females, 13 males), 30 Class II individuals (14 females, 16 males), and 27 Class III individuals (12 females, 15 males) in the normodivergent and growth development period were used. The masseter, anterior digastric, and geniohyoid muscles of individuals were examined using ultrasonography and ultrasonographic elastography, and comparisons were made between the classes. Statistical analysis was accomplished by Mann Whitney U, One-way ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis H tests.

Results: Interclass differences were found in ultrasonography and elastography measurements of the masseter muscle. However, no differences were observed in ultrasonography measurements of the auxiliary masticatory muscles, whereas differences were seen only in the geniohyoid muscle in elastography measurements among the classes (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Individuals with different sagittal skeletal malocclusions during growth and development exhibited similar muscle sizes and elasticities, approximately close to each other.

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过超声波和超声波弹性成像评估不同矢状向骨骼异常患者的咀嚼肌。

研究目的本研究旨在使用超声波和超声波弹性成像技术，对生长发育时期相似但矢状骨骼畸形程度不同的个体的颌间肌、前地包天肌和舌根肌进行评估，并进行类间评估：本研究使用了正常发育期和生长发育期的 30 名 I 类个体（17 名女性，13 名男性）、30 名 II 类个体（14 名女性，16 名男性）和 27 名 III 类个体（12 名女性，15 名男性）的超声波和超声波弹性成像记录。使用超声波和超声波弹性成像技术对个体的颌间肌、前地包肌和舌根肌进行了检查，并对不同等级的个体进行了比较。统计分析采用 Mann Whitney U、单因素方差分析和 Kruskal Wallis H 检验：结果：在对颌下肌进行超声波和弹性成像测量时发现了班级间的差异。然而，在咀嚼辅助肌的超声波成像测量中未观察到差异，而在弹性成像测量中，仅在舌骨后肌的测量中发现了类间差异（p 结论：咀嚼辅助肌的超声波成像测量结果与类间差异无关：在生长发育过程中存在不同矢状骨骼畸形的个体表现出相似的肌肉大小和弹性，大致接近。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

13.60%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.