Teaching and Assessing Pharmacy Students in Medication-Use Process Stewardship.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lisa Lebovitz, Amy L Ives, Seth P Brownlee
{"title":"Teaching and Assessing Pharmacy Students in Medication-Use Process Stewardship.","authors":"Lisa Lebovitz, Amy L Ives, Seth P Brownlee","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The medication use system is a complex process of medication prescribing, order processing, dispensing, administration, and effects monitoring. Objectives of this review are to describe the available literature and identify resources for educating and assessing pharmacy students in Medication-use Process Stewardship.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2013, the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) published educational outcomes (EOs) including Medication-use Systems Management (CAPE 2.2, Manager). In 2022, the EOs for pharmacy education were updated and integrated with Entrustable Practice Activities (EPAs) as Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities (COEPA). During this evolution the revised Medication-use Process Stewardship (COEPA 2.6, Steward) de-emphasized process management while focusing more on stewardship of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP), person-centered care and optimizing patient outcomes, and environmental impact of medication-use systems. A literature review identified 41 articles relevant to pharmacy education and assessment of medication-use concepts. Most available literature is aligned with CAPE 2013 domain 2.2 Manager, not COEPA 2.6 Steward. Many articles reported innovations in teaching and assessment, such as simulation in prescription verification and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). Few articles reported on prescription verification and dispensing in non-community settings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The change from management to stewardship in COEPA 2.6 has significant curricular implications with the emphasis moving from process- to person-centered care. However, continued integration of process-centered activities throughout the curriculum is essential to fully prepare graduates for entry level practice. Future research is needed to identify approaches for teaching and assessing stewardship and the environmental impact of medication use systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The medication use system is a complex process of medication prescribing, order processing, dispensing, administration, and effects monitoring. Objectives of this review are to describe the available literature and identify resources for educating and assessing pharmacy students in Medication-use Process Stewardship.

Findings: In 2013, the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) published educational outcomes (EOs) including Medication-use Systems Management (CAPE 2.2, Manager). In 2022, the EOs for pharmacy education were updated and integrated with Entrustable Practice Activities (EPAs) as Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities (COEPA). During this evolution the revised Medication-use Process Stewardship (COEPA 2.6, Steward) de-emphasized process management while focusing more on stewardship of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP), person-centered care and optimizing patient outcomes, and environmental impact of medication-use systems. A literature review identified 41 articles relevant to pharmacy education and assessment of medication-use concepts. Most available literature is aligned with CAPE 2013 domain 2.2 Manager, not COEPA 2.6 Steward. Many articles reported innovations in teaching and assessment, such as simulation in prescription verification and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). Few articles reported on prescription verification and dispensing in non-community settings.

Summary: The change from management to stewardship in COEPA 2.6 has significant curricular implications with the emphasis moving from process- to person-centered care. However, continued integration of process-centered activities throughout the curriculum is essential to fully prepare graduates for entry level practice. Future research is needed to identify approaches for teaching and assessing stewardship and the environmental impact of medication use systems.

对药学专业学生进行用药过程管理的教学和评估。
目的:药物使用系统是一个复杂的过程,包括药物处方、订单处理、配发、管理和效果监测。本综述旨在描述现有文献,并确定对药学专业学生进行用药过程管理教育和评估的资源:2013 年,药学教育促进中心 (CAPE) 发布了包括用药系统管理在内的教育成果 (EOs)(CAPE 2.2,经理)。2022 年,药学教育的教育成果(EOs)得到更新,并与可委托实践活动(EPAs)整合为课程成果和可委托实践活动(COEPA)。在这一演变过程中,修订后的 "用药过程监管"(COEPA 2.6,Steward)不再强调过程管理,而是更加关注药剂师患者护理过程(PPCP)的监管、以人为本的护理和优化患者疗效,以及用药系统对环境的影响。文献综述发现了 41 篇与药学教育和用药概念评估相关的文章。大多数现有文献与 CAPE 2013 领域 2.2 管理者相一致,而不是 COEPA 2.6 管理者。许多文章报道了教学和评估方面的创新,如处方验证模拟和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。总结:COEPA 2.6 中从管理到监管的转变对课程有重大影响,重点从以流程为中心的护理转变为以人为本的护理。然而,在整个课程中继续整合以过程为中心的活动,对于让毕业生为初级实践做好充分准备至关重要。今后还需要开展研究,以确定教学和评估监管以及用药系统对环境影响的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信