Manual wheelchair training approaches and intended training outcomes for adults who are new to wheelchair use: A scoping review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Kimberly Charlton, Carolyn Murray, Natasha Layton, Emilee Ong, Lucy Farrar, Trish Serocki, Stacie Attrill
{"title":"Manual wheelchair training approaches and intended training outcomes for adults who are new to wheelchair use: A scoping review","authors":"Kimberly Charlton,&nbsp;Carolyn Murray,&nbsp;Natasha Layton,&nbsp;Emilee Ong,&nbsp;Lucy Farrar,&nbsp;Trish Serocki,&nbsp;Stacie Attrill","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Wheelchair training is pivotal for safety, independence, and occupational engagement in the community, yet adults coming into wheelchair use often receive insufficient or untailored training. This research aimed to understand the range and type of manual wheelchair training approaches that exist for adults commencing wheelchair use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic scoping review involved searching eight electronic databases and grey literature up to September 2023. Papers relating to manual wheelchair training for adults and their caregivers were included for data extraction. Eighty-seven articles were included in this review. The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) was used to organise and analyse data related to intended training outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>Consumer consultation was not included in this review; however, the outcomes suggest that involving consumers in future wheelchair training research is critical to assure community participation outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data were extracted from 87 papers. Manual wheelchair training was delivered across diverse contexts encompassing varied support structures, trainer backgrounds, and technology and was commonly directed towards wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Intended training outcomes most frequently mapped to the activity and participation component of the ICF (<i>n</i> = 39), followed by personal factors (<i>n</i> = 27), body structures and functions (<i>n</i> = 18), and environmental factors (<i>n</i> = 3), with limited focus on longer term occupational engagement outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Most existing manual wheelchair training focussed on the acquisition of individual wheelchair skill and may not facilitate generalised and long-term occupational participation outcomes. Further exploration into the contexts that support occupational engagement, particularly for older adults with progressive conditions, is required to support service provision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>We looked at what manual wheelchair training approaches exist for adults who need to use a manual wheelchair and what training helps people to do/achieve. We did a scoping review that looked at literature about manual wheelchair training programs for adult wheelchair users. We found 87 research papers and training programs that we included in our review. We recorded and analysed information from all the papers about the wheelchair training programs and outcomes for people who do these programs. We found that manual wheelchair training can be done in structured or ad hoc ways, can have different amounts of training, can be provided face-to-face or online, and can be given by different allied health professionals and other wheelchair users. Most training programs had short-term outcomes like learning manual wheelchair skills, being able to use the wheelchair properly, and feeling confident about using a wheelchair. Some had longer term outcomes about being able to use the manual wheelchair in everyday activities. Most people who did the training programs that we looked at in this review were manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Because not many wheelchair programs have been tried with people who do not have a spinal cord injury, it is hard for occupational therapists to make recommendations about training for other people who use a manual wheelchair. Manual wheelchair training that is done in the community and made to meet the needs of individuals may help people with using their wheelchair for their everyday activities and participate in their community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12992","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Wheelchair training is pivotal for safety, independence, and occupational engagement in the community, yet adults coming into wheelchair use often receive insufficient or untailored training. This research aimed to understand the range and type of manual wheelchair training approaches that exist for adults commencing wheelchair use.

Method

A systematic scoping review involved searching eight electronic databases and grey literature up to September 2023. Papers relating to manual wheelchair training for adults and their caregivers were included for data extraction. Eighty-seven articles were included in this review. The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) was used to organise and analyse data related to intended training outcomes.

Consumer and Community Involvement

Consumer consultation was not included in this review; however, the outcomes suggest that involving consumers in future wheelchair training research is critical to assure community participation outcomes.

Results

Data were extracted from 87 papers. Manual wheelchair training was delivered across diverse contexts encompassing varied support structures, trainer backgrounds, and technology and was commonly directed towards wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Intended training outcomes most frequently mapped to the activity and participation component of the ICF (n = 39), followed by personal factors (n = 27), body structures and functions (n = 18), and environmental factors (n = 3), with limited focus on longer term occupational engagement outcomes.

Conclusion

Most existing manual wheelchair training focussed on the acquisition of individual wheelchair skill and may not facilitate generalised and long-term occupational participation outcomes. Further exploration into the contexts that support occupational engagement, particularly for older adults with progressive conditions, is required to support service provision.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

We looked at what manual wheelchair training approaches exist for adults who need to use a manual wheelchair and what training helps people to do/achieve. We did a scoping review that looked at literature about manual wheelchair training programs for adult wheelchair users. We found 87 research papers and training programs that we included in our review. We recorded and analysed information from all the papers about the wheelchair training programs and outcomes for people who do these programs. We found that manual wheelchair training can be done in structured or ad hoc ways, can have different amounts of training, can be provided face-to-face or online, and can be given by different allied health professionals and other wheelchair users. Most training programs had short-term outcomes like learning manual wheelchair skills, being able to use the wheelchair properly, and feeling confident about using a wheelchair. Some had longer term outcomes about being able to use the manual wheelchair in everyday activities. Most people who did the training programs that we looked at in this review were manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Because not many wheelchair programs have been tried with people who do not have a spinal cord injury, it is hard for occupational therapists to make recommendations about training for other people who use a manual wheelchair. Manual wheelchair training that is done in the community and made to meet the needs of individuals may help people with using their wheelchair for their everyday activities and participate in their community.

Abstract Image

针对初次使用轮椅的成年人的手动轮椅训练方法和预期训练效果:范围综述。
导言:轮椅训练对于轮椅的安全性、独立性以及在社区中的职业参与至关重要,然而,刚开始使用轮椅的成年人往往得不到足够的训练,或者得不到量身定制的训练。本研究旨在了解针对开始使用轮椅的成年人的手动轮椅训练方法的范围和类型:系统性的范围界定审查包括搜索八个电子数据库和截至 2023 年 9 月的灰色文献。与成人及其护理人员手动轮椅训练相关的论文被纳入数据提取范围。本次综述共纳入 87 篇文章。国际功能分类(ICF)用于组织和分析与预期训练结果相关的数据:本综述未纳入消费者咨询;但研究结果表明,让消费者参与未来的轮椅训练研究对于确保社区参与成果至关重要:从 87 篇论文中提取了数据。手动轮椅训练在不同的环境中进行,包括不同的支持结构、训练者背景和技术,通常针对脊髓损伤的轮椅使用者。预期的培训结果最常与 ICF 的活动和参与部分相对应(39 例),其次是个人因素(27 例)、身体结构和功能(18 例)以及环境因素(3 例),对长期职业参与结果的关注有限:结论:现有的手动轮椅训练大多侧重于个人轮椅技能的掌握,可能无法促进普遍和长期的职业参与效果。需要进一步探索支持职业参与的环境,特别是对于患有渐进性疾病的老年人,以支持服务的提供。原文摘要:我们研究了针对需要使用手动轮椅的成年人有哪些手动轮椅培训方法,以及培训能帮助人们做什么/实现什么。我们对有关成人轮椅使用者手动轮椅训练计划的文献进行了范围界定审查。我们发现了 87 篇研究论文和培训计划,并将其纳入了我们的综述。我们记录并分析了所有论文中有关轮椅训练计划和参加这些计划的人的结果的信息。我们发现,手动轮椅训练可以采用结构化或临时性的方式,可以有不同的训练量,可以面对面或在线提供,也可以由不同的专职医疗人员和其他轮椅使用者提供。大多数培训项目都有短期效果,如学习手动轮椅技能、能够正确使用轮椅以及对使用轮椅充满信心。有些培训项目的长期目标是能够在日常活动中使用手动轮椅。我们在本综述中研究的大多数参加训练项目的人都是脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者。由于没有多少轮椅训练项目是针对没有脊髓损伤的人进行的,因此职业治疗师很难为其他使用手动轮椅的人提供训练建议。在社区中进行的手动轮椅训练如果能满足个人需求,将有助于他们使用轮椅进行日常活动和参与社区活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信