The impact of threat of shock on memory for threat-irrelevant information: Evidence for a role of reduced semantic organization

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Felicia M. Chaisson , Christopher R. Cox , Amber M. Alford , Lauryn M. Burleigh , Steven G. Greening , Heather D. Lucas
{"title":"The impact of threat of shock on memory for threat-irrelevant information: Evidence for a role of reduced semantic organization","authors":"Felicia M. Chaisson ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Cox ,&nbsp;Amber M. Alford ,&nbsp;Lauryn M. Burleigh ,&nbsp;Steven G. Greening ,&nbsp;Heather D. Lucas","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research into the effects of acute anxiety on episodic memory has produced inconsistent findings, particularly for threat-neutral information. In two experiments, we tested the hypothesis that anxiety induced by threat of shock can interfere with the use of semantic-organizational processes that benefit memory. In Experiment 1, participants viewed and freely recalled two lists of semantically unrelated neutral words, one encoded in a threatening context (threat blocks) and one encoded without threat (safe blocks). As predicted, significantly fewer words were recalled during threat than safe blocks. Moreover, free recall patterns following threat blocks showed lower levels of semantic organization as assessed using a “path length” measurement that considers the semantic distance between pairs of consecutively recalled words. Both effects unexpectedly interacted with block order, such that they primarily reflected improved recall and increased semantic organization from the first to the second block in participants who received the threat block first. Experiment 2 used semantically related word lists to reduce potential impacts of task experience on semantic organization. Free recall was again less accurate and showed longer (less organized) path lengths for threat than safe blocks, and the path length effect no longer interacted with block order. Moreover, threat-induced changes to path lengths emerged as a mediator of the relation between physiological effects of threat (increased skin conductance) and reduced subsequent memory. These data point to semantic control processes as an understudied determinant of when and how acute anxiety impacts episodic memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 108877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124001364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research into the effects of acute anxiety on episodic memory has produced inconsistent findings, particularly for threat-neutral information. In two experiments, we tested the hypothesis that anxiety induced by threat of shock can interfere with the use of semantic-organizational processes that benefit memory. In Experiment 1, participants viewed and freely recalled two lists of semantically unrelated neutral words, one encoded in a threatening context (threat blocks) and one encoded without threat (safe blocks). As predicted, significantly fewer words were recalled during threat than safe blocks. Moreover, free recall patterns following threat blocks showed lower levels of semantic organization as assessed using a “path length” measurement that considers the semantic distance between pairs of consecutively recalled words. Both effects unexpectedly interacted with block order, such that they primarily reflected improved recall and increased semantic organization from the first to the second block in participants who received the threat block first. Experiment 2 used semantically related word lists to reduce potential impacts of task experience on semantic organization. Free recall was again less accurate and showed longer (less organized) path lengths for threat than safe blocks, and the path length effect no longer interacted with block order. Moreover, threat-induced changes to path lengths emerged as a mediator of the relation between physiological effects of threat (increased skin conductance) and reduced subsequent memory. These data point to semantic control processes as an understudied determinant of when and how acute anxiety impacts episodic memory.
休克威胁对威胁无关信息记忆的影响:证明语义组织减少的作用
关于急性焦虑对外显记忆影响的研究结果并不一致,尤其是对威胁中性信息的影响。在两个实验中,我们检验了这样一个假设:由惊吓威胁引起的焦虑会干扰有利于记忆的语义组织过程的使用。在实验一中,受试者观看并自由回忆两个语义无关的中性词列表,一个是在有威胁的语境中编码的(威胁区块),另一个是在没有威胁的语境中编码的(安全区块)。正如预测的那样,在威胁区块中回忆的词语明显少于安全区块。此外,威胁区块后的自由回忆模式显示出较低的语义组织水平,这是用 "路径长度 "测量法评估的,该测量法考虑了连续回忆的词对之间的语义距离。这两种效应出乎意料地与区块顺序相互影响,因此它们主要反映了先接受威胁区块的参与者从第一个区块到第二个区块的回忆能力提高和语义组织能力增强。实验 2 使用了语义相关的单词表,以减少任务经验对语义组织的潜在影响。与安全区块相比,威胁区块的自由回忆的准确性再次降低,并且显示出更长(组织性更差)的路径长度,而且路径长度效应不再与区块顺序相互影响。此外,威胁引起的路径长度变化成为威胁生理效应(皮肤电导增加)与后续记忆减少之间关系的中介。这些数据表明,语义控制过程是急性焦虑何时以及如何影响外显记忆的一个未被充分研究的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信