The self-efficacy for regular meditation practice scale (SERMS): Development and psychometric validation.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Carly A Hunt, Janelle E Letzen, Dana Direnzo, Neda F Gould, Erica Ms Sibinga, Maria Vetter, Caroline Webb, Patrick H Finan, Chung Jung Mun
{"title":"The self-efficacy for regular meditation practice scale (SERMS): Development and psychometric validation.","authors":"Carly A Hunt, Janelle E Letzen, Dana Direnzo, Neda F Gould, Erica Ms Sibinga, Maria Vetter, Caroline Webb, Patrick H Finan, Chung Jung Mun","doi":"10.1177/13591053241274462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health benefits of meditation are well-documented, yet people struggle to practice regularly. Domain-specific self-efficacy is an important modifiable driver of health behavior change that is poorly understood in the meditation context. As such, the present study developed the Self-Efficacy for Regular Meditation Practice Scale (SERMS) assessing confidence in one's capacity to meditate frequently and in a way that favorably impacts well-being, including securing the psychological, social, and structural supports needed for ongoing practice. Participants provided online survey data at baseline and 1-week follow-up. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted (<i>n</i> = 249) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (<i>n</i> = 249). A three-factor structure best fit the data, with subscales measuring self-efficacy to benefit from meditation, persist in meditation, and obtain teacher and community support. Validity and test-retest reliability coefficients supported the SERMS as a promising measure of self-efficacy for meditation that may further research on meditation behavior adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053241274462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241274462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The health benefits of meditation are well-documented, yet people struggle to practice regularly. Domain-specific self-efficacy is an important modifiable driver of health behavior change that is poorly understood in the meditation context. As such, the present study developed the Self-Efficacy for Regular Meditation Practice Scale (SERMS) assessing confidence in one's capacity to meditate frequently and in a way that favorably impacts well-being, including securing the psychological, social, and structural supports needed for ongoing practice. Participants provided online survey data at baseline and 1-week follow-up. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted (n = 249) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (n = 249). A three-factor structure best fit the data, with subscales measuring self-efficacy to benefit from meditation, persist in meditation, and obtain teacher and community support. Validity and test-retest reliability coefficients supported the SERMS as a promising measure of self-efficacy for meditation that may further research on meditation behavior adoption.

定期冥想练习的自我效能感量表(SERMS):开发与心理测量验证。
冥想对健康的益处是有据可查的,但人们却很难定期练习。特定领域的自我效能感是改变健康行为的一个重要驱动因素,但在冥想方面却鲜为人知。因此,本研究开发了 "定期冥想练习自我效能感量表"(SERMS),以评估一个人是否有能力经常冥想,并以一种对幸福产生有利影响的方式冥想,包括确保持续练习所需的心理、社会和结构支持。参与者在基线和一周随访时提供了在线调查数据。在进行了探索性因子分析(n = 249)后,又进行了确认性因子分析(n = 249)。三因素结构最适合数据,其子量表分别测量从冥想中获益的自我效能感、坚持冥想的自我效能感以及获得教师和社区支持的自我效能感。SERMS的效度和测试-重复信度系数支持SERMS作为冥想自我效能感的一种有前途的测量方法,可进一步促进对冥想行为采用的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信