Transition From Graduate Medical Education to Independent Practice: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jillian Zavodnick, Abby Adamczyk, Gretchen Diemer, Timothy Kuchera, Nia Leonard, Rebecca Jaffe
{"title":"Transition From Graduate Medical Education to Independent Practice: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jillian Zavodnick, Abby Adamczyk, Gretchen Diemer, Timothy Kuchera, Nia Leonard, Rebecca Jaffe","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the gaps in early career physician readiness for independent practice after graduating from their final graduate medical education (GME) program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors conducted a literature search of 4 online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Health Business Elite, and Education Resources Information Center) using the following terms: population terms (GME, fellow, resident, and others), early career terms (onboarding, hiring, early career, ready, and others), readiness terms (readiness, preparedness, knowledge, skills, competence), and independence terms (attending, physician, independent practice). The databases were searched on March 12, 2024, for articles that explored GME graduate gaps in readiness for independent practice; assessment tools, curricula, or curricular need aimed at gaps in early career physician readiness; or an area where GME graduates need more knowledge and skills. They extracted specific gaps in preparedness and categorized them using existing competency frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search returned 116 articles addressing gaps in preparedness for independent practice among recent GME graduates. Surgery yielded more articles than any other specialty (43 [37%]). Overall, 192 individual gaps were extracted; the greatest number of gaps came from patient care (75 [39%]) followed by personal and professional development (44 [23%]). The most frequently identified gaps were procedural independence (10 occurrences), practice management (9 occurrences), and billing (7 occurrences).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite advances in GME, learners still struggle when transitioning to independent practice. Personal and professional development is a useful categorization for many gaps and should be considered for inclusion as a GME competency. Systematic assessment of new-to-practice attendings could help stakeholders better understand the true outcomes of GME programs. Concerted investment by specialty societies may drive greater understanding and innovative solutions. Additional study could help address the challenges in the GME-to-practice transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the gaps in early career physician readiness for independent practice after graduating from their final graduate medical education (GME) program.

Method: The authors conducted a literature search of 4 online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Health Business Elite, and Education Resources Information Center) using the following terms: population terms (GME, fellow, resident, and others), early career terms (onboarding, hiring, early career, ready, and others), readiness terms (readiness, preparedness, knowledge, skills, competence), and independence terms (attending, physician, independent practice). The databases were searched on March 12, 2024, for articles that explored GME graduate gaps in readiness for independent practice; assessment tools, curricula, or curricular need aimed at gaps in early career physician readiness; or an area where GME graduates need more knowledge and skills. They extracted specific gaps in preparedness and categorized them using existing competency frameworks.

Results: The search returned 116 articles addressing gaps in preparedness for independent practice among recent GME graduates. Surgery yielded more articles than any other specialty (43 [37%]). Overall, 192 individual gaps were extracted; the greatest number of gaps came from patient care (75 [39%]) followed by personal and professional development (44 [23%]). The most frequently identified gaps were procedural independence (10 occurrences), practice management (9 occurrences), and billing (7 occurrences).

Conclusions: Despite advances in GME, learners still struggle when transitioning to independent practice. Personal and professional development is a useful categorization for many gaps and should be considered for inclusion as a GME competency. Systematic assessment of new-to-practice attendings could help stakeholders better understand the true outcomes of GME programs. Concerted investment by specialty societies may drive greater understanding and innovative solutions. Additional study could help address the challenges in the GME-to-practice transition.

从医学研究生教育到独立执业的过渡:范围审查。
目的:本研究探讨了早期职业医师在毕业于最后一个研究生医学教育(GME)项目后为独立执业做好准备方面存在的差距:作者使用以下术语对 4 个在线数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Health Business Elite 和 Education Resources Information Center)进行了文献检索:人群术语(GME、研究员、住院医师及其他)、早期职业术语(入职、聘用、早期职业、准备及其他)、准备术语(准备、准备、知识、技能、能力)和独立术语(主治医师、医师、独立执业)。他们于 2024 年 3 月 12 日在数据库中搜索了以下方面的文章:探讨 GME 毕业生在独立执业准备方面的差距;针对早期职业医师准备差距的评估工具、课程或课程需求;或 GME 毕业生需要更多知识和技能的领域。他们提取了准备工作中的具体差距,并利用现有的能力框架对其进行了分类:结果:搜索结果显示,有 116 篇文章探讨了应届 GME 毕业生在独立执业准备方面存在的差距。外科的文章数量多于其他专业(43 篇 [37%])。总体而言,共提取了 192 个差距;最多的差距来自病人护理(75 [39%]),其次是个人和专业发展(44 [23%])。最常发现的差距是程序独立性(10 次)、实践管理(9 次)和计费(7 次):结论:尽管全球医学教育取得了进步,但学习者在过渡到独立实践时仍会遇到困难。个人和职业发展是对许多差距的有用分类,应考虑将其列为 GME 能力。对新执业的主治医师进行系统评估,有助于相关方更好地了解 GME 项目的真实成果。专科学会的协同投资可能会促进对问题的进一步了解和创新性解决方案。更多的研究可以帮助解决从 GME 到执业过渡过程中的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信