Testing the predictions of reinforcement: long-term empirical data from a damselfly mottled hybrid zone.

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Luis Rodrigo Arce-Valdés, Andrea Viviana Ballén-Guapacha, Anais Rivas-Torres, Jesús Ramsés Chávez-Ríos, Maren Wellenreuther, Bengt Hansson, Rosa Ana Sánchez Guillén
{"title":"Testing the predictions of reinforcement: long-term empirical data from a damselfly mottled hybrid zone.","authors":"Luis Rodrigo Arce-Valdés, Andrea Viviana Ballén-Guapacha, Anais Rivas-Torres, Jesús Ramsés Chávez-Ríos, Maren Wellenreuther, Bengt Hansson, Rosa Ana Sánchez Guillén","doi":"10.1093/jeb/voae124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theoretical work suggests that reinforcement can cause the strengthening of prezygotic isolation in sympatry by mitigating the costs of maladaptive hybridization. However, only a handful of studies have simultaneously tested multiple predictions of this theory in natural populations. We investigated reinforcement in a mottled hybrid zone between the damselflies Ischnura elegans and I. graellsii, which are characterized by incomplete and asymmetric reproductive isolation and exhibit reproductive character displacement in mating-related structures. We tested the conditions for reinforcement by quantifying whether hybridization was costly and prezygotic isolation stronger in sympatry compared with allopatry. Additionally, we investigated two specific predictions of reinforcement: i) greater premating asymmetries in sympatry; and ii) weaker postzygotic isolation in sympatry than in allopatry. Our findings indicate the presence of maladaptive hybrids, which suggests Bateson-Dobzhansky-Müller incompatibilities in allopatry. We also found that reinforcement has strengthened mechanical isolation, at least in one direction in sympatry. We observed evidence for greater premating asymmetries in sympatry than in allopatry, which is consistent with reinforcement. However, fully testing the prediction of weaker postzygotic isolation in sympatry compared to allopatry was hindered by the highly asymmetrical levels of reproductive isolation between the two reciprocal cross directions. Our study highlights a case where reinforcement and heterospecific gene flow exert opposite effects on reproductive isolation between reciprocal crosses, where reinforcement increases reproductive isolation in one direction while gene flow weakens it in the opposite direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theoretical work suggests that reinforcement can cause the strengthening of prezygotic isolation in sympatry by mitigating the costs of maladaptive hybridization. However, only a handful of studies have simultaneously tested multiple predictions of this theory in natural populations. We investigated reinforcement in a mottled hybrid zone between the damselflies Ischnura elegans and I. graellsii, which are characterized by incomplete and asymmetric reproductive isolation and exhibit reproductive character displacement in mating-related structures. We tested the conditions for reinforcement by quantifying whether hybridization was costly and prezygotic isolation stronger in sympatry compared with allopatry. Additionally, we investigated two specific predictions of reinforcement: i) greater premating asymmetries in sympatry; and ii) weaker postzygotic isolation in sympatry than in allopatry. Our findings indicate the presence of maladaptive hybrids, which suggests Bateson-Dobzhansky-Müller incompatibilities in allopatry. We also found that reinforcement has strengthened mechanical isolation, at least in one direction in sympatry. We observed evidence for greater premating asymmetries in sympatry than in allopatry, which is consistent with reinforcement. However, fully testing the prediction of weaker postzygotic isolation in sympatry compared to allopatry was hindered by the highly asymmetrical levels of reproductive isolation between the two reciprocal cross directions. Our study highlights a case where reinforcement and heterospecific gene flow exert opposite effects on reproductive isolation between reciprocal crosses, where reinforcement increases reproductive isolation in one direction while gene flow weakens it in the opposite direction.

测试强化预测:来自豆娘斑驳杂交区的长期经验数据。
理论研究表明,强化可以通过降低不适应性杂交的成本来加强同源繁殖中的祖先隔离。然而,只有少数研究在自然种群中同时检验了这一理论的多种预测。我们研究了豆娘Ischnura elegans和I. graellsii之间斑驳杂交区的强化,它们具有不完全和不对称的生殖隔离特征,并在交配相关结构中表现出生殖特征位移。我们通过量化交配与异配相比,杂交是否代价高昂以及杂交前隔离是否更强,来检验强化的条件。此外,我们还研究了强化的两个具体预测:i)交配前的不对称在交配中更严重;ii)交配后的同卵隔离在交配中比异卵隔离更弱。我们的研究结果表明,异配中存在适应不良的杂交种,这表明贝特森-多布占斯基-米勒(Bateson-Dobzhansky-Müller)不相容。我们还发现,强化加强了机械隔离,至少在交配的一个方向上是这样。我们观察到交配前不对称现象在合子中比异子中更严重,这与强化作用是一致的。然而,由于两个互交方向的生殖隔离水平高度不对称,因此无法充分检验交配后生殖隔离弱于异交后生殖隔离的预测。我们的研究强调了强化和异种基因流对互交间生殖隔离产生相反影响的情况,即强化增加了一个方向的生殖隔离,而基因流则削弱了相反方向的生殖隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It covers both micro- and macro-evolution of all types of organisms. The aim of the Journal is to integrate perspectives across molecular and microbial evolution, behaviour, genetics, ecology, life histories, development, palaeontology, systematics and morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信