Development and validation of a prediction model for estimating 24-Hour Urinary Sodium Excretion using spot urine samples in adult patients.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Miriam Menacho-Roman, Martin Fabregate-Fuente, Laura Caja-Guayerbas, Sergio Jiménez-Sánchez, Javier Soto, Ignacio Arribas-Gómez
{"title":"Development and validation of a prediction model for estimating 24-Hour Urinary Sodium Excretion using spot urine samples in adult patients.","authors":"Miriam Menacho-Roman, Martin Fabregate-Fuente, Laura Caja-Guayerbas, Sergio Jiménez-Sánchez, Javier Soto, Ignacio Arribas-Gómez","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement of urinary sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating urinary sodium excretion.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Methods: A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cut-off value of 130 mmol/24h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model was well calibrated (slope [95%CI] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 p<0.0001), accuracy (P30): 56.8%, and AUC-ROC: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95%CI makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2024.09.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of urinary sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating urinary sodium excretion.

Objective: To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.

Design: Methods: A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cut-off value of 130 mmol/24h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.

Results: The model was well calibrated (slope [95%CI] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 p<0.0001), accuracy (P30): 56.8%, and AUC-ROC: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.

Conclusion: Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95%CI makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.

利用成年患者的定点尿样,开发并验证用于估算 24 小时尿钠排泄量的预测模型。
尿钠排泄量的测量可提供有关个人钠平衡的宝贵信息,并有助于各种疾病的治疗。然而,24 小时尿样的采集可能会出现误差。定点尿钠(uNa)测量是估算尿钠排泄量的可靠方法,可替代 24 小时尿样采集:目的:评估能否通过采集医院门诊成年患者的定点尿样来估算其 24 小时尿钠排泄量(24uNa):设计:方法:本医院开展了一项横断面研究,包括一个开发队列(284 名患者)和一个验证队列(229 名患者)。建立了一个多变量线性回归模型,并与以前的模型进行了比较。通过 C 统计量评估,对预设的 uNa 临界值 130 mmol/24h 进行了一致性分析,并比较了对每位患者进行正确分类的能力:结果:该模型校准良好(内部验证中的斜率[95%CI]为 0.965 [0.9960.965 [0.947-0.987]),显示出良好的区分度,在外部验证队列中也表现良好(斜率:0.811 [0.675-0.946])。通过 NaRYC 测量的 24uNa 与估计的 24uNa 之间的平均偏差为 24.85 mmol/24h [17.06-32.63]。NaRYC 的皮尔逊系数(0.613 pC)最高:虽然结果的平均偏差是可以接受的,但在 95%CI 中观察到的变异性并不建议在单个受试者的基础上普遍使用定点尿代替 24 小时尿来估算尿液中 Na 的总排泄量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Journal of Renal Nutrition 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Nutrition is devoted exclusively to renal nutrition science and renal dietetics. Its content is appropriate for nutritionists, physicians and researchers working in nephrology. Each issue contains a state-of-the-art review, original research, articles on the clinical management and education of patients, a current literature review, and nutritional analysis of food products that have clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信