Validation of Saliva as the Clinical Specimen Type for a University-Wide COVID-19 Surveillance Program.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Viruses-Basel Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.3390/v16091494
Michael L Farrell, Anton V Bryksin, Emily Ryan, Jessica Lin, Naima Djeddar, German Khunteev, Benjamin Holton, Miles Paca, Nicholas Speller, James T Merrill, Ted M Ross, Robert J Hogan, Greg Gibson, Andrés J García, Michael P Shannon
{"title":"Validation of Saliva as the Clinical Specimen Type for a University-Wide COVID-19 Surveillance Program.","authors":"Michael L Farrell, Anton V Bryksin, Emily Ryan, Jessica Lin, Naima Djeddar, German Khunteev, Benjamin Holton, Miles Paca, Nicholas Speller, James T Merrill, Ted M Ross, Robert J Hogan, Greg Gibson, Andrés J García, Michael P Shannon","doi":"10.3390/v16091494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Georgia Institute of Technology made the decision to keep the university doors open for on-campus attendance. To manage COVID-19 infection rates, internal resources were applied to develop and implement a mass asymptomatic surveillance program. The objective was to identify infections early for proper follow-on verification testing, contact tracing, and quarantine/isolation as needed. Program success depended on frequent and voluntary sample collection from over 40,000 students, faculty, and staff personnel. At that time, the nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, not saliva, was the main accepted sample type for COVID-19 testing. However, due to collection discomfort and the inability to be self-collected, the NP swab was not feasible for voluntary and frequent self-collection. Therefore, saliva was selected as the clinical sample type and validated. A saliva collection kit and a sample processing and analysis workflow were developed. The results of a clinical sample-type comparison study between co-collected and matched NP swabs and saliva samples showed 96.7% positive agreement and 100% negative agreement. During the Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 semesters, 319,988 samples were collected and tested. The program resulted in maintaining a low overall mean positivity rate of 0.78% and 0.54% for the Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 semesters, respectively. For this high-throughput asymptomatic COVID-19 screening application, saliva was an exceptionally good sample type.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Georgia Institute of Technology made the decision to keep the university doors open for on-campus attendance. To manage COVID-19 infection rates, internal resources were applied to develop and implement a mass asymptomatic surveillance program. The objective was to identify infections early for proper follow-on verification testing, contact tracing, and quarantine/isolation as needed. Program success depended on frequent and voluntary sample collection from over 40,000 students, faculty, and staff personnel. At that time, the nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, not saliva, was the main accepted sample type for COVID-19 testing. However, due to collection discomfort and the inability to be self-collected, the NP swab was not feasible for voluntary and frequent self-collection. Therefore, saliva was selected as the clinical sample type and validated. A saliva collection kit and a sample processing and analysis workflow were developed. The results of a clinical sample-type comparison study between co-collected and matched NP swabs and saliva samples showed 96.7% positive agreement and 100% negative agreement. During the Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 semesters, 319,988 samples were collected and tested. The program resulted in maintaining a low overall mean positivity rate of 0.78% and 0.54% for the Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 semesters, respectively. For this high-throughput asymptomatic COVID-19 screening application, saliva was an exceptionally good sample type.

验证将唾液作为全校 COVID-19 监测计划的临床样本类型。
在 COVID-19 大流行之初,佐治亚理工学院决定继续对校内学生开放。为了控制 COVID-19 的感染率,学校利用内部资源制定并实施了大规模无症状监测计划。其目的是及早发现感染病例,以便进行适当的后续验证测试、接触者追踪以及必要的隔离/隔离。该计划的成功有赖于对 40,000 多名学生、教职员工进行频繁和自愿的样本采集。当时,鼻咽(NP)拭子(而非唾液)是 COVID-19 检测所接受的主要样本类型。然而,由于采集不适和无法自行采集,鼻咽拭子无法用于自愿和频繁的自行采集。因此,唾液被选为临床样本类型并得到验证。我们开发了唾液采集试剂盒和样本处理与分析工作流程。在共同采集和匹配的 NP 拭子和唾液样本之间进行的临床样本类型比较研究结果显示,阳性一致率为 96.7%,阴性一致率为 100%。在 2020 年秋季学期和 2021 年春季学期,共采集和检测了 319,988 份样本。在 2020 年秋季学期和 2021 年春季学期,该计划分别保持了 0.78% 和 0.54% 的低总体平均阳性率。对于这种高通量无症状 COVID-19 筛查应用来说,唾液是一种特别好的样本类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Viruses-Basel
Viruses-Basel VIROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信