Herbivore regulation of savanna vegetation: Structural complexity, diversity, and the complexity–diversity relationship

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Tyler C. Coverdale, Peter B. Boucher, Jenia Singh, Todd M. Palmer, Jacob R. Goheen, Robert M. Pringle, Andrew B. Davies
{"title":"Herbivore regulation of savanna vegetation: Structural complexity, diversity, and the complexity–diversity relationship","authors":"Tyler C. Coverdale,&nbsp;Peter B. Boucher,&nbsp;Jenia Singh,&nbsp;Todd M. Palmer,&nbsp;Jacob R. Goheen,&nbsp;Robert M. Pringle,&nbsp;Andrew B. Davies","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large mammalian herbivores exert strong top-down control on plants, which in turn influence most ecological processes. Accordingly, the decline, displacement, or extinction of wild large herbivores in African savannas is expected to alter the physical structure of vegetation, the diversity of plant communities, and downstream ecosystem functions. However, herbivore impacts on vegetation comprise both direct and indirect effects and often depend on herbivore body size and plant type. Understanding how herbivores affect savanna vegetation requires disaggregating the effects of different herbivores and the responses of different plants, as well as accounting for both the structural complexity and composition of plant assemblages. We combined high-resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) with field measurements from size-selective herbivore exclosures in Kenya to determine how herbivores affect the diversity and physical structure of vegetation, how these impacts vary with body size and plant type, and whether there are predictable associations between plant diversity and structural complexity. Herbivores generally reduced the diversity and abundance of both overstory and understory plants, though the magnitude of these impacts varied substantially as a function of body size and plant type: only megaherbivores (elephants and giraffes) affected tree cover, whereas medium- and small-bodied herbivores had stronger effects on herbaceous diversity and abundance. We also found evidence that herbivores altered the strength and direction of interactions between trees and herbaceous plants, with signatures of facilitation in the presence of herbivores and of competition in their absence. While megaherbivores uniquely affected tree structure, medium- and small-bodied species had stronger (and complementary) effects on metrics of herbaceous vegetation structure. Plant structural responses to herbivore exclusion were species-specific: of five dominant tree species, just three exhibited significant individual morphological variation across exclosure treatments, and the size class of herbivores responsible for these effects varied across species. Irrespective of exclosure treatment, more species-rich plant communities were more structurally complex. We conclude that the diversity and architecture of savanna vegetation depend on consumptive and nonconsumptive plant–herbivore interactions; the roles of herbivore diversity, body size, and plant traits in mediating those interactions; and a positive feedback between plant diversity and structural complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1624","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large mammalian herbivores exert strong top-down control on plants, which in turn influence most ecological processes. Accordingly, the decline, displacement, or extinction of wild large herbivores in African savannas is expected to alter the physical structure of vegetation, the diversity of plant communities, and downstream ecosystem functions. However, herbivore impacts on vegetation comprise both direct and indirect effects and often depend on herbivore body size and plant type. Understanding how herbivores affect savanna vegetation requires disaggregating the effects of different herbivores and the responses of different plants, as well as accounting for both the structural complexity and composition of plant assemblages. We combined high-resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) with field measurements from size-selective herbivore exclosures in Kenya to determine how herbivores affect the diversity and physical structure of vegetation, how these impacts vary with body size and plant type, and whether there are predictable associations between plant diversity and structural complexity. Herbivores generally reduced the diversity and abundance of both overstory and understory plants, though the magnitude of these impacts varied substantially as a function of body size and plant type: only megaherbivores (elephants and giraffes) affected tree cover, whereas medium- and small-bodied herbivores had stronger effects on herbaceous diversity and abundance. We also found evidence that herbivores altered the strength and direction of interactions between trees and herbaceous plants, with signatures of facilitation in the presence of herbivores and of competition in their absence. While megaherbivores uniquely affected tree structure, medium- and small-bodied species had stronger (and complementary) effects on metrics of herbaceous vegetation structure. Plant structural responses to herbivore exclusion were species-specific: of five dominant tree species, just three exhibited significant individual morphological variation across exclosure treatments, and the size class of herbivores responsible for these effects varied across species. Irrespective of exclosure treatment, more species-rich plant communities were more structurally complex. We conclude that the diversity and architecture of savanna vegetation depend on consumptive and nonconsumptive plant–herbivore interactions; the roles of herbivore diversity, body size, and plant traits in mediating those interactions; and a positive feedback between plant diversity and structural complexity.

食草动物对热带稀树草原植被的调节:结构复杂性、多样性以及复杂性与多样性之间的关系
大型哺乳类食草动物对植物施加强大的自上而下的控制,进而影响大多数生态过程。因此,非洲热带草原上野生大型食草动物的减少、迁移或灭绝预计会改变植被的物理结构、植物群落的多样性以及下游生态系统的功能。然而,食草动物对植被的影响包括直接影响和间接影响,通常取决于食草动物的体型和植物类型。要了解食草动物对热带稀树草原植被的影响,需要分解不同食草动物的影响和不同植物的反应,并考虑植物群落的结构复杂性和组成。我们将高分辨率光探测与测距仪(LiDAR)与肯尼亚食草动物体型选择性围栏的实地测量相结合,以确定食草动物如何影响植被的多样性和物理结构,这些影响如何随体型和植物类型而变化,以及植物多样性和结构复杂性之间是否存在可预测的关联。食草动物普遍降低了上层植物和下层植物的多样性和丰度,但这些影响的程度因体型和植物类型的不同而有很大差异:只有巨型食草动物(大象和长颈鹿)会影响树木覆盖率,而中型和小型食草动物对草本植物多样性和丰度的影响更大。我们还发现有证据表明,食草动物改变了树木与草本植物之间相互作用的强度和方向,在有食草动物的情况下表现为促进作用,而在没有食草动物的情况下则表现为竞争作用。虽然巨型食草动物对树木结构有独特的影响,但中型和小型食草动物对草本植被结构指标的影响更强(而且是互补的)。植物结构对食草动物排斥的反应具有物种特异性:在五个优势树种中,仅有三个树种在不同的围封处理中表现出显著的个体形态差异,而造成这些影响的食草动物的大小等级也因物种而异。无论采用哪种围封处理,物种越丰富的植物群落结构越复杂。我们的结论是:热带稀树草原植被的多样性和结构取决于消耗性和非消耗性植物-食草动物之间的相互作用;食草动物的多样性、体型和植物性状在这些相互作用中的中介作用;以及植物多样性和结构复杂性之间的正反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信