{"title":"Low N2O emissions induced by root-derived residues compared to aboveground residues of red clover or grass mixed into soil","authors":"Marina Azzaroli Bleken , Tatiana Francischinelli Rittl , Shahid Nadeem","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The default The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines assume a constant N<sub>2</sub>O emission factor (EF<sub>N2O</sub>) for both belowground crop residues (BGR) and aboveground residues (AGR), and that ∼70 % of total N<sub>2</sub>O emissions following renewal of temporary grasslands come from BGR. However, empirical evidence is lacking, which motivated this study. BGR-free and BGR-rich clay loam collected in grass or red clover leys were incubated alone or mixed with AGR and different doses of nitrate over 107 days. The average EF<sub>N2O</sub> of BGR was around 18 % of that of AGR, and remained low even when soil nitrate concentration was very high, whereas EF<sub>N2O</sub> of AGR varied largely and rocketed even with a small increase in soil nitrate. The decomposition of the carbon present in crop residues was critical for N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Lower EF<sub>N2O</sub> of BGR relative to AGR were related to slower C decomposition, which was not predicted by the biochemical characteristics. It is also likely that BGR were less conducive than AGR to develop into hotspots for N<sub>2</sub>O emission because of the roots’ finer distribution and closer contact with soil particles. Differences in EF<sub>N2O</sub> among AGR were mostly linked to the availability of N, either derived from residue mineralization or present in the soil. In conclusion, N<sub>2</sub>O accountings based on present IPCC default methodology likely overestimate the contribution by crops’ BGR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 106309"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The default The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines assume a constant N2O emission factor (EFN2O) for both belowground crop residues (BGR) and aboveground residues (AGR), and that ∼70 % of total N2O emissions following renewal of temporary grasslands come from BGR. However, empirical evidence is lacking, which motivated this study. BGR-free and BGR-rich clay loam collected in grass or red clover leys were incubated alone or mixed with AGR and different doses of nitrate over 107 days. The average EFN2O of BGR was around 18 % of that of AGR, and remained low even when soil nitrate concentration was very high, whereas EFN2O of AGR varied largely and rocketed even with a small increase in soil nitrate. The decomposition of the carbon present in crop residues was critical for N2O emissions. Lower EFN2O of BGR relative to AGR were related to slower C decomposition, which was not predicted by the biochemical characteristics. It is also likely that BGR were less conducive than AGR to develop into hotspots for N2O emission because of the roots’ finer distribution and closer contact with soil particles. Differences in EFN2O among AGR were mostly linked to the availability of N, either derived from residue mineralization or present in the soil. In conclusion, N2O accountings based on present IPCC default methodology likely overestimate the contribution by crops’ BGR.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.