Shaping multilateral regional governance of climate and forests: Exploring the influence of Forest industry lobbying on state participation

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Fredy David Polo-Villanueva , Simon Schaub , Laura Rivadeneira , Jale Tosun , Lukas Giessen , Sarah Lilian Burns
{"title":"Shaping multilateral regional governance of climate and forests: Exploring the influence of Forest industry lobbying on state participation","authors":"Fredy David Polo-Villanueva ,&nbsp;Simon Schaub ,&nbsp;Laura Rivadeneira ,&nbsp;Jale Tosun ,&nbsp;Lukas Giessen ,&nbsp;Sarah Lilian Burns","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to characterise the institutional dynamics of Multilateral Regional Governance Arrangements at the Climate-Forest Interface (MRGA-CFI) and investigate the influence of the forest industry lobby groups on state participation in these arrangements. We use an original dataset to characterise the issue scope, spatial ambit, and governance functions of MRGA-CFI. State participation in these arrangements is modelled as a function of the strength of the forest industry lobby groups; measured as the proportion of forest that has been planted in a state, alongside various control variables. Our findings reveal that most MRGA-CFI focus on forests but are relevant for climate issues, have contiguous spatial ambit primarily in Asia and Africa, and focus on knowledge dissemination and capacity building. Quantitative analysis reveals a positive significant association between the strength of the forest industry lobby groups and state participation in MRGA-CFI. The analysis further suggests that states with stronger forest industry lobby groups are more likely to participate in non-centralised arrangements and those that focus on forest but not climate. Conversely, such states are also less likely to participate in governance arrangements that focus on both forest and climate issues. We conclude that while regional cooperation on climate and forests has been designed to capture funds from the climate regime and form negotiating coalitions, the forest industry lobbies governments to prevent such cooperation from overregulating their economic activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 103346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to characterise the institutional dynamics of Multilateral Regional Governance Arrangements at the Climate-Forest Interface (MRGA-CFI) and investigate the influence of the forest industry lobby groups on state participation in these arrangements. We use an original dataset to characterise the issue scope, spatial ambit, and governance functions of MRGA-CFI. State participation in these arrangements is modelled as a function of the strength of the forest industry lobby groups; measured as the proportion of forest that has been planted in a state, alongside various control variables. Our findings reveal that most MRGA-CFI focus on forests but are relevant for climate issues, have contiguous spatial ambit primarily in Asia and Africa, and focus on knowledge dissemination and capacity building. Quantitative analysis reveals a positive significant association between the strength of the forest industry lobby groups and state participation in MRGA-CFI. The analysis further suggests that states with stronger forest industry lobby groups are more likely to participate in non-centralised arrangements and those that focus on forest but not climate. Conversely, such states are also less likely to participate in governance arrangements that focus on both forest and climate issues. We conclude that while regional cooperation on climate and forests has been designed to capture funds from the climate regime and form negotiating coalitions, the forest industry lobbies governments to prevent such cooperation from overregulating their economic activities.
塑造气候与森林的多边区域治理:探索林业游说对国家参与的影响
本研究旨在描述气候-森林界面多边区域治理安排(MRGA-CFI)的制度动态,并调查林业游说团体对国家参与这些安排的影响。我们使用原始数据集来描述气候-森林界面多边区域治理安排的问题范围、空间范围和治理功能。国家在这些安排中的参与度被模拟为林业游说团体实力的函数;林业游说团体的实力是以一个州的森林种植比例以及各种控制变量来衡量的。我们的研究结果表明,大多数 MRGA-CFI 以森林为重点,但也与气候问题相关,主要在亚洲和非洲有毗连的空间范围,并以知识传播和能力建设为重点。定量分析显示,森林产业游说团体的实力与国家对 MRGA-CFI 的参与之间存在正相关关系。分析进一步表明,林业游说团体实力较强的国家更有可能参与非集中化安排,以及那些关注森林而非气候的安排。相反,这些国家参与同时关注森林和气候问题的治理安排的可能性也较小。我们的结论是,虽然气候和森林方面的区域合作旨在从气候机制中获取资金并形成谈判联盟,但林业游说政府阻止此类合作对其经济活动进行过度监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信