Participation and Yield in Multiple Rounds of Colorectal Cancer Screening based on Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yueyang Zhou,Na Li,Jiahui Luo,Yuqing Chen,Yuelun Zhang,Min Dai,Hongda Chen
{"title":"Participation and Yield in Multiple Rounds of Colorectal Cancer Screening based on Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yueyang Zhou,Na Li,Jiahui Luo,Yuqing Chen,Yuelun Zhang,Min Dai,Hongda Chen","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIMS\r\nThe evidence on the cumulative participation and yield in multiple rounds of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on fecal immunochemical test is sparse. We aimed to assess the trends in participation and detection for advanced colorectal neoplasm under different screening intervals in multi-round FIT-based CRC screening by synthesizing the current available evidence.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were retrieved from January 1, 2002 to April 16, 2024 for potential eligible studies and then we synthesized participation and advanced colorectal neoplasm detection rates for each screening round, along with their respective 95% confidence intervals.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n19 studies involving a total of 2,296,071 individuals were included. As screening rounds increased, participation exhibited a gradual consistent increase, reaching 78.45% and 74.97% for annual and biennial screening strategies. For annual screening, the cumulative detection rates for 3 rounds were 1.38% (95% CI: 1.18-1.63%), 1.95% (95% CI: 1.72-2.21%), and 2.50% (95% CI: 2.29-2.72%), respectively. For biennial screening, the cumulative detection rates for 4 rounds were 2.22% (95% CI: 1.22-3.22%), 3.44% (95% CI: 2.06-4.82%), 4.26% (95% CI: 2.70-5.83%), and 5.10% (95% CI: 3.28-7.29%), respectively. Notably, the per-round detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasms declined yet as the screening progressed.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn population-based CRC screening programs, the participation exhibited a slow upward trend for both screening strategies, but the incremental benefits in CRC detection gradually diminished. Tailored strategies, such as extending intervals for individuals with multiple negative FIT results, might optimize effectiveness and cost-efficiency in population-based CRC screening.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The evidence on the cumulative participation and yield in multiple rounds of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on fecal immunochemical test is sparse. We aimed to assess the trends in participation and detection for advanced colorectal neoplasm under different screening intervals in multi-round FIT-based CRC screening by synthesizing the current available evidence. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were retrieved from January 1, 2002 to April 16, 2024 for potential eligible studies and then we synthesized participation and advanced colorectal neoplasm detection rates for each screening round, along with their respective 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS 19 studies involving a total of 2,296,071 individuals were included. As screening rounds increased, participation exhibited a gradual consistent increase, reaching 78.45% and 74.97% for annual and biennial screening strategies. For annual screening, the cumulative detection rates for 3 rounds were 1.38% (95% CI: 1.18-1.63%), 1.95% (95% CI: 1.72-2.21%), and 2.50% (95% CI: 2.29-2.72%), respectively. For biennial screening, the cumulative detection rates for 4 rounds were 2.22% (95% CI: 1.22-3.22%), 3.44% (95% CI: 2.06-4.82%), 4.26% (95% CI: 2.70-5.83%), and 5.10% (95% CI: 3.28-7.29%), respectively. Notably, the per-round detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasms declined yet as the screening progressed. CONCLUSION In population-based CRC screening programs, the participation exhibited a slow upward trend for both screening strategies, but the incremental benefits in CRC detection gradually diminished. Tailored strategies, such as extending intervals for individuals with multiple negative FIT results, might optimize effectiveness and cost-efficiency in population-based CRC screening.
基于粪便免疫化学检验的多轮结直肠癌筛查的参与度和收益率:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景和目的关于基于粪便免疫化学检验的多轮结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的累积参与率和检出率的证据很少。我们的目的是通过综合现有证据,评估基于 FIT 的多轮 CRC 筛查在不同筛查间隔下的参与率和晚期结直肠肿瘤检出率的趋势。方法检索了 2002 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 4 月 16 日期间的 SpubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 等网站上可能符合条件的研究,然后综合了每轮筛查的参与率和晚期结直肠肿瘤检出率,以及各自的 95% 置信区间。随着筛查轮次的增加,参与率呈现出逐步持续上升的趋势,年度筛查和两年一次筛查的参与率分别达到 78.45% 和 74.97%。就年度筛查而言,3 轮筛查的累计检出率分别为 1.38%(95% CI:1.18-1.63%)、1.95%(95% CI:1.72-2.21%)和 2.50%(95% CI:2.29-2.72%)。就两年一次的筛查而言,4 轮筛查的累计检出率分别为 2.22%(95% CI:1.22-3.22%)、3.44%(95% CI:2.06-4.82%)、4.26%(95% CI:2.70-5.83%)和 5.10%(95% CI:3.28-7.29%)。结论在以人群为基础的 CRC 筛查项目中,两种筛查策略的参与率都呈现出缓慢上升的趋势,但在 CRC 检测方面的增量效益逐渐减少。量身定制的策略,如延长 FIT 多次阴性结果患者的筛查间隔时间,可能会优化人群 CRC 筛查的有效性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信