Asma Akter , Margaret S. Cooper , Afnan M.F. Darwesh , Robert C. Hider , Philip J. Blower , Nicholas M. Price , Oliver Lyons , Silke Schelenz , Varun Mehra , Vincenzo Abbate
{"title":"Radiotracers for in situ infection imaging: Experimental considerations for in vitro microbial uptake of gallium-68-labeled siderophores","authors":"Asma Akter , Margaret S. Cooper , Afnan M.F. Darwesh , Robert C. Hider , Philip J. Blower , Nicholas M. Price , Oliver Lyons , Silke Schelenz , Varun Mehra , Vincenzo Abbate","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>In vitro</em> screening of gallium-68(<sup>68</sup>Ga)-siderophores in pathogens relevant to infections is valuable for determining species specificity, their effect on cell viability, and potential clinical applications. As the recognition and internalization of siderophores relies on the presence of receptor- and/or siderophore-binding proteins, the level of uptake can vary between species. Here, we report <em>in vitro</em> uptake validation in <em>Escherichia coli</em> with its native siderophore, enterobactin (ENT) ([<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-ENT), considering different experimental factors. Compared with other reporting methods of uptake, ‘% Added dose/10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL (% AD/10<sup>9</sup> CFU/mL),’ considering the total viable count, showed a better comparison among microbial species. Later, <em>in vitro</em> screening with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-desferrioxamine B (DFO-B) showed high uptake by <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and <em>S. epidermidis</em>; moderate uptake by <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>; poor uptake by <em>E. coli, Candida albicans</em>, and <em>Aspergillus fumigatus</em>; and no uptake by <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> and <em>C. glabrata</em>. Except for <em>S. epidermidis</em>, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DFO-B did not reduce the cell viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"110 4","pages":"Article 116522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889324003481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In vitro screening of gallium-68(68Ga)-siderophores in pathogens relevant to infections is valuable for determining species specificity, their effect on cell viability, and potential clinical applications. As the recognition and internalization of siderophores relies on the presence of receptor- and/or siderophore-binding proteins, the level of uptake can vary between species. Here, we report in vitro uptake validation in Escherichia coli with its native siderophore, enterobactin (ENT) ([68Ga]Ga-ENT), considering different experimental factors. Compared with other reporting methods of uptake, ‘% Added dose/109 CFU/mL (% AD/109 CFU/mL),’ considering the total viable count, showed a better comparison among microbial species. Later, in vitro screening with [68Ga]Ga-desferrioxamine B (DFO-B) showed high uptake by Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis; moderate uptake by Pseudomonas aeruginosa; poor uptake by E. coli, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus fumigatus; and no uptake by Enterococcus faecalis and C. glabrata. Except for S. epidermidis, [68Ga]Ga-DFO-B did not reduce the cell viability.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.