Work-Related Factors Associated With Psychological Distress Among Grocery Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic

{"title":"Work-Related Factors Associated With Psychological Distress Among Grocery Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, grocery workers experienced new (in addition to existing) work-related stressors that put them at risk for psychological distress. This study uses the job demands-resources theory to identify and describe the job demands and resources associated with grocery worker distress.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study analyzed data from 75 90-minute interviews focusing on grocery workers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the interviews, participants also answered questions associated with the Patient Health Questionnaire 4, a validated measure of psychological distress.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the study found that 36% of study participants exhibited mild to severe psychological distress at the time of their interviews, and a greater proportion of young, female, and White participants reported mild to severe psychological distress than did participants in other subgroups. Qualitative data suggest that the prevalence of psychological distress among participants was likely higher at the beginning of the pandemic and resulted from fear of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, conflict with customers, workplace discrimination, increased workload, and designation as an essential worker. Although about half of the participants in the sample said that their employers provided support to improve workers’ mental health, the interviews suggest that more could be done.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings may lead to opportunities to improve worker well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and to prepare for future public health emergencies. Proposed strategies include implementing public health measures as advised by infectious disease experts; offering information and training; providing sick leave, long-term hazard pay, higher wages, and mental health benefits; and better distribution of workloads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

During the COVID-19 pandemic, grocery workers experienced new (in addition to existing) work-related stressors that put them at risk for psychological distress. This study uses the job demands-resources theory to identify and describe the job demands and resources associated with grocery worker distress.

Methods

This study analyzed data from 75 90-minute interviews focusing on grocery workers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the interviews, participants also answered questions associated with the Patient Health Questionnaire 4, a validated measure of psychological distress.

Results

Overall, the study found that 36% of study participants exhibited mild to severe psychological distress at the time of their interviews, and a greater proportion of young, female, and White participants reported mild to severe psychological distress than did participants in other subgroups. Qualitative data suggest that the prevalence of psychological distress among participants was likely higher at the beginning of the pandemic and resulted from fear of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, conflict with customers, workplace discrimination, increased workload, and designation as an essential worker. Although about half of the participants in the sample said that their employers provided support to improve workers’ mental health, the interviews suggest that more could be done.

Conclusions

These findings may lead to opportunities to improve worker well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and to prepare for future public health emergencies. Proposed strategies include implementing public health measures as advised by infectious disease experts; offering information and training; providing sick leave, long-term hazard pay, higher wages, and mental health benefits; and better distribution of workloads.
与 COVID-19 大流行期间杂货店员工心理压力有关的工作相关因素
导言在 COVID-19 大流行期间,杂货店员工经历了与工作相关的新压力(除了已有的压力),这些压力使他们面临心理困扰的风险。本研究采用工作需求-资源理论来识别和描述与杂货店员工心理困扰相关的工作需求和资源。研究方法本研究分析了 75 个 90 分钟访谈中的数据,访谈的重点是杂货店员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。在访谈过程中,参与者还回答了与患者健康问卷 4 相关的问题,患者健康问卷 4 是一种有效的心理压力测量方法。结果总体而言,研究发现,36% 的研究参与者在访谈时表现出轻度至重度心理压力,与其他亚群的参与者相比,更多的年轻女性和白人参与者报告了轻度至重度心理压力。定性数据表明,在大流行初期,参与者的心理压力可能会更大,其原因可能是害怕接触 SARS-CoV-2、与客户发生冲突、工作场所受到歧视、工作量增加以及被指定为重要工作者。尽管样本中约有一半的参与者说他们的雇主为改善工人的心理健康提供了支持,但访谈表明还可以做得更多。建议的策略包括按照传染病专家的建议实施公共卫生措施;提供信息和培训;提供病假、长期危险津贴、更高的工资和心理健康福利;以及更好地分配工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信