Xiaosheng Li , Ruirui Wang , Zhiyang Shen , Malin Song
{"title":"Government environmental signals, government–Enterprise collusion and corporate pollution transfer","authors":"Xiaosheng Li , Ruirui Wang , Zhiyang Shen , Malin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To optimize the implementation of environmental policies and foster green development in China's economy, it is crucial to be vigilant about corporate pollution transfer behaviors and regulate collusive relationships between local governments and enterprises. This study introduces a theoretical four-way game model to explore the impact of corporate pollution transfer, considering environmental regulation by the central government and third-party oversight, as well as collusion between local governments and firms. Using data from China's A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2021, this study examines whether polluting firms engage in pollution transfer in response to environmental policies, with the Low-carbon City Pilot Policy (LCPP) serving as a proxy for government environmental signals. The findings reveal that the LCPP generally affects corporate pollution transfer. Mechanism analysis shows that the LCPP reduces pollution transfer through both formal and informal regulatory channels. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the pollution transfer effect is more pronounced in local state-owned enterprises, companies with a history of financial fraud, and highly polluting industries. Additionally, the study highlights that collusion between the government and enterprises promotes corporate pollution transfer, while changes in local government personnel disrupt this collusion and reduce pollution transfer. The research also identifies the supply chain as a key transmission path for pollution transfer. This work not only advances theoretical and empirical understanding of corporate behavior under environmental policy influence but also enriches research on government-enterprise relations and the effectiveness of environmental policies. It offers theoretical support and policy recommendations for constructing a rational green economic development system in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 107935"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324006431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To optimize the implementation of environmental policies and foster green development in China's economy, it is crucial to be vigilant about corporate pollution transfer behaviors and regulate collusive relationships between local governments and enterprises. This study introduces a theoretical four-way game model to explore the impact of corporate pollution transfer, considering environmental regulation by the central government and third-party oversight, as well as collusion between local governments and firms. Using data from China's A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2021, this study examines whether polluting firms engage in pollution transfer in response to environmental policies, with the Low-carbon City Pilot Policy (LCPP) serving as a proxy for government environmental signals. The findings reveal that the LCPP generally affects corporate pollution transfer. Mechanism analysis shows that the LCPP reduces pollution transfer through both formal and informal regulatory channels. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the pollution transfer effect is more pronounced in local state-owned enterprises, companies with a history of financial fraud, and highly polluting industries. Additionally, the study highlights that collusion between the government and enterprises promotes corporate pollution transfer, while changes in local government personnel disrupt this collusion and reduce pollution transfer. The research also identifies the supply chain as a key transmission path for pollution transfer. This work not only advances theoretical and empirical understanding of corporate behavior under environmental policy influence but also enriches research on government-enterprise relations and the effectiveness of environmental policies. It offers theoretical support and policy recommendations for constructing a rational green economic development system in China.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.