The Effect of Exercise Training on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Neil A. Smart, David Downes, Tom van der Touw, Swastika Hada, Gudrun Dieberg, Melissa J. Pearson, Mitchell Wolden, Nicola King, Stephen P. J. Goodman
{"title":"The Effect of Exercise Training on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Neil A. Smart, David Downes, Tom van der Touw, Swastika Hada, Gudrun Dieberg, Melissa J. Pearson, Mitchell Wolden, Nicola King, Stephen P. J. Goodman","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02115-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Dyslipidemia is a primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exercise training (EXTr) improves some lipid markers but not others; the literature is dated and analyses may be underpowered.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>To clarify which lipid markers are altered with ExTr and establish if information size had yet reached futility.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis, with meta-regression, to establish expected effect size in lipid profile with aerobic (AT), resistance (RT) and combined (CT = AT + RT) ExTr. We conducted trial sequence analysis (TSA) to control for type I and II error and establish if information size had reached futility.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We included 148 relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ExTr, with 227 intervention groups, total 8673 participants; exercise 5273, sedentary control 3400. Total cholesterol (TC) MD – 5.90 mg/dL (95% confidence interval (CI) – 8.14, – 3.65), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) 2.11 (95% CI 1.43, 2.79), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) – 7.22 (95% CI – 9.08, – 5.35), triglycerides – 8.01 (95% CI – 10.45, – 5.58) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL) – 3.85 (95% CI – 5.49, – 2.22) all showed significant but modest 3.5–11.7%, improvements following ExTr. TSA indicated all analyses exceeded minimum information size to reach futility. CT was optimal for dyslipidemia management. Meta-regression showed every extra weekly aerobic session reduced TC – 7.68 mg/dL and for every extra week of training by – 0.5 mg/dL. Each minute of session time produced an additional 2.11 mg/dL HDL increase.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>TSA analysis revealed sufficient data exist to confirm ExTr will improve all five lipid outcomes. CT is optimal for lipid management. The modest effect observed may moderate dyslipidemia medication for primary prevention. Prediction intervals suggest TC, HDL, LDL and TGD are only improved in one-quarter of studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02115-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dyslipidemia is a primary risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exercise training (EXTr) improves some lipid markers but not others; the literature is dated and analyses may be underpowered.

Objectives

To clarify which lipid markers are altered with ExTr and establish if information size had yet reached futility.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis, with meta-regression, to establish expected effect size in lipid profile with aerobic (AT), resistance (RT) and combined (CT = AT + RT) ExTr. We conducted trial sequence analysis (TSA) to control for type I and II error and establish if information size had reached futility.

Results

We included 148 relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ExTr, with 227 intervention groups, total 8673 participants; exercise 5273, sedentary control 3400. Total cholesterol (TC) MD – 5.90 mg/dL (95% confidence interval (CI) – 8.14, – 3.65), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) 2.11 (95% CI 1.43, 2.79), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) – 7.22 (95% CI – 9.08, – 5.35), triglycerides – 8.01 (95% CI – 10.45, – 5.58) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL) – 3.85 (95% CI – 5.49, – 2.22) all showed significant but modest 3.5–11.7%, improvements following ExTr. TSA indicated all analyses exceeded minimum information size to reach futility. CT was optimal for dyslipidemia management. Meta-regression showed every extra weekly aerobic session reduced TC – 7.68 mg/dL and for every extra week of training by – 0.5 mg/dL. Each minute of session time produced an additional 2.11 mg/dL HDL increase.

Conclusion

TSA analysis revealed sufficient data exist to confirm ExTr will improve all five lipid outcomes. CT is optimal for lipid management. The modest effect observed may moderate dyslipidemia medication for primary prevention. Prediction intervals suggest TC, HDL, LDL and TGD are only improved in one-quarter of studies.

Abstract Image

运动训练对血脂的影响:系统回顾与元分析
背景血脂异常是心血管疾病(CVD)的主要风险因素。方法我们进行了一项系统综述/元分析,并进行了元回归,以确定有氧(AT)、阻力(RT)和联合(CT = AT + RT)运动训练对血脂谱的预期效应大小。我们进行了试验序列分析(TSA),以控制 I 型和 II 型误差,并确定信息量是否达到无用程度。结果我们纳入了 148 项相关的 ExTr 随机对照试验(RCT),其中有 227 个干预组,共有 8673 名参与者;运动组 5273 人,静坐对照组 3400 人。总胆固醇 (TC) MD - 5.90 mg/dL (95% 置信区间 (CI) - 8.14, - 3.65),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (HDL) 2.11 (95% CI 1.43, 2.79),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 (LDL) - 7.22 (95% CI - 9.08, - 5.35),甘油三酯 - 8.TSA表明所有分析都超过了最小信息量,达到了无用的程度。CT 是治疗血脂异常的最佳方法。元回归显示,每周每多进行一次有氧训练,血脂浓度就会降低 7.68 毫克/分升,每多进行一周训练,血脂浓度就会降低 0.5 毫克/分升。结论TSA 分析显示,有足够的数据证实 ExTr 可以改善所有五种血脂结果。CT 是血脂管理的最佳方法。观察到的适度效果可能会缓和用于一级预防的血脂异常药物治疗。预测区间表明,只有四分之一的研究能改善 TC、HDL、LDL 和 TGD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信